Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 May 2013, 07:03
Customize  |  Hide

Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1108
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point [#permalink] New post 08 Feb 2008, 06:19
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point out that since 1987, revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees attended consultant-led seminars were lower than revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees did not attend such seminars. The critics charge that for vacuum cleaner companies, the sales seminars are ill conceived and a waste of money.
Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to the critics of sales seminars?
(A) Those vacuum cleaner companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 are the only companies that did not send employees to the seminars.
(B) Vacuum cleaner companies that have sent employees to sales seminars since 1987 experienced a greater drop in sales than they had prior to 1987.
(C) The cost of vacuum cleaner sales seminars run by outside consultants has risen dramatically since 1987.
(D) The poor design of vacuum cleaner sales seminars is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness.
(E) Since 1987, sales of vacuum cleaners have risen twenty percent.


explanations please
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3594
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 230

Kudos [?]: 1299 [0], given: 346

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: cr - 1000 test 1-18 [#permalink] New post 08 Feb 2008, 07:01
A

Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point out that since 1987, revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees attended consultant-led seminars were lower than revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees did not attend such seminars. The critics charge that for vacuum cleaner companies, the sales seminars are ill conceived and a waste of money.

[X] vacuum cleaner companies whose employees attended consultant-led seminars
[Y] vacuum cleaner companies whose employees did not attend such seminars.
The assumption: the group of [X] is equal the group of [Y].


Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to the critics of sales seminars?

(A) Those vacuum cleaner companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 are the only companies that did not send employees to the seminars. - the best. [X] have less revenue than [Y] regardless of seminars.
(B) Vacuum cleaner companies that have sent employees to sales seminars since 1987 experienced a greater drop in sales than they had prior to 1987. - nothing about [Y]
(C) The cost of vacuum cleaner sales seminars run by outside consultants has risen dramatically since 1987. - irrelevant
(D) The poor design of vacuum cleaner sales seminars is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness. - it states that seminars were really bad.
(E) Since 1987, sales of vacuum cleaners have risen twenty percent. - irrelevant
_________________

iOS/Android: GMAT ToolKit - The bestselling GMAT prep app | GMAT Club (free) | PrepGame | GRE ToolKit | LSAT ToolKit
PROMO: Are you an exiting GMAT ToolKit (iOS) user? Get GMAT ToolKit 2 (iOS) for free* (read more)
Math: GMAT Math Book ||| General: GMATTimer ||| Chicago Booth: Slide Presentation
The People Who Are Crazy Enough to Think They Can Change the World, Are the Ones Who Do.

Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: cr - 1000 test 1-18 [#permalink] New post 08 Feb 2008, 14:36
(A)

The passage is assuming that the two groups of companies are identical except for the use of consultant-led seminar, in which case a revenue comparison between the two will show the effectiveness of the seminar. (A) effectively challenged the claim by saying that the two groups of companies also differ in ways other than the use of the seminar.
Director
Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 635
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: cr - 1000 test 1-18 [#permalink] New post 08 Feb 2008, 15:51
I agree with A
VP
VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1108
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: cr - 1000 test 1-18 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2008, 23:20
maratikus wrote:
I agree with A


oa a
Re: cr - 1000 test 1-18   [#permalink] 10 Feb 2008, 23:20
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point myc2004 5 06 Apr 2006, 04:11
Popular new posts Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point sperinko 15 06 Aug 2006, 16:08
New posts Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point dwivedys 4 10 Aug 2006, 12:44
Popular new posts Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point arjsingh1976 10 26 Oct 2006, 23:38
New posts Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point rdg 7 20 Feb 2007, 13:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.