Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer a divided by positive integer d yields a reminder of r can always be expressed as a=qd+r, where q is called a quotient and r is called a remainder, note here that 0\leq{r}<d (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above k is divided by j yields a remainder of r can be expressed as: k=qj+r, where 0\leq{r}<j=divisor. Question: r=?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and r=5, as given equation is very similar to k=qj+r. But we don't know whether 5<j: remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If k=6 and j=1 then 6=1*1+5 and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If k=11 and j=6 then 11=1*6+5 and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) j > 5 --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) k = jm + 5 and j > 5 --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> r=5. Sufficient.

Or: k = jm + 5 --> first term jm is clearly divisible by j and 5 divided by j as (j>5) yields remainder of 5.

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer a divided by positive integer d yields a reminder of r can always be expressed as a=qd+r, where q is called a quotient and r is called a remainder, note here that 0\leq{r}<d (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above k is divided by j yields a remainder of r can be expressed as: k=qj+r, where 0\leq{r}<j=divisor. Question: r=?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and r=5, as given equation is very similar to k=qj+r. But we don't know whether 5<j: remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If k=6 and j=1 then 6=1*1+5 and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If k=11 and j=6 then 11=1*6+5 and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) j > 5 --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) k = jm + 5 and j > 5 --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> r=5. Sufficient.

Or: k = jm + 5 --> first term jm is clearly divisible by j and 5 divided by j as (j>5) yields remainder of 5.

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer a divided by positive integer d yields a reminder of r can always be expressed as a=qd+r, where q is called a quotient and r is called a remainder, note here that 0\leq{r}<d (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above k is divided by j yields a remainder of r can be expressed as: k=qj+r, where 0\leq{r}<j=divisor. Question: r=?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and r=5, as given equation is very similar to k=qj+r. But we don't know whether 5<j: remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If k=6 and j=1 then 6=1*1+5 and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If k=11 and j=6 then 11=1*6+5 and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) j > 5 --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) k = jm + 5 and j > 5 --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> r=5. Sufficient.

Or: k = jm + 5 --> first term jm is clearly divisible by j and 5 divided by j as (j>5) yields remainder of 5.

Answer: C.

I do not understand why the reminder is still 5....

If you have 25=20*2 + 5 than reminder is 5. But if K/J than the reminder is 5/10: 0.5 not 5. And indeed 25/10=2.5 and 2+0.5=2.5

Therefore, the value of the reminder when K is divided by J is correlated with the value of J.

This is why I answered E because we do not know the value of J.

Where did I get wrong?

Thanks!

The remainder when k=25 is divided by j=20 is 5. The remainder when k=5 is divided by j=10 is 5 too.

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer a divided by positive integer d yields a reminder of r can always be expressed as a=qd+r, where q is called a quotient and r is called a remainder, note here that 0\leq{r}<d (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above k is divided by j yields a remainder of r can be expressed as: k=qj+r, where 0\leq{r}<j=divisor. Question: r=?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and r=5, as given equation is very similar to k=qj+r. But we don't know whether 5<j: remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If k=6 and j=1 then 6=1*1+5 and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If k=11 and j=6 then 11=1*6+5 and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) j > 5 --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) k = jm + 5 and j > 5 --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> r=5. Sufficient.

Or: k = jm + 5 --> first term jm is clearly divisible by j and 5 divided by j as (j>5) yields remainder of 5.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

Could you please elaborate as to why A is not the right answer. Would really appreciate it. Thanks

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer a divided by positive integer d yields a reminder of r can always be expressed as a=qd+r, where q is called a quotient and r is called a remainder, note here that 0\leq{r}<d (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above k is divided by j yields a remainder of r can be expressed as: k=qj+r, where 0\leq{r}<j=divisor. Question: r=?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and r=5, as given equation is very similar to k=qj+r. But we don't know whether 5<j: remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If k=6 and j=1 then 6=1*1+5 and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If k=11 and j=6 then 11=1*6+5 and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) j > 5 --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) k = jm + 5 and j > 5 --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> r=5. Sufficient.

Or: k = jm + 5 --> first term jm is clearly divisible by j and 5 divided by j as (j>5) yields remainder of 5.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

Could you please elaborate as to why A is not the right answer. Would really appreciate it. Thanks

Consider the examples for the first statement given in my solution proving that this statement is not sufficient. _________________

If j and k are positive integers where k > j, what is the value of the remainder when k is divided by j?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5.

(2) j > 5

Got the answer as E , can someone testify ..whether the answer ..i am getting is right or wrong and also post the explanation.

Thanks

Positive integer a divided by positive integer d yields a reminder of r can always be expressed as a=qd+r, where q is called a quotient and r is called a remainder, note here that 0\leq{r}<d (remainder is non-negative integer and always less than divisor).

So according to above k is divided by j yields a remainder of r can be expressed as: k=qj+r, where 0\leq{r}<j=divisor. Question: r=?

(1) There exists a positive integer m such that k = jm + 5 --> it's tempting to say that this statement is sufficient and r=5, as given equation is very similar to k=qj+r. But we don't know whether 5<j: remainder must be less than divisor.

For example: If k=6 and j=1 then 6=1*1+5 and the remainder upon division 6 by 1 is zero; If k=11 and j=6 then 11=1*6+5 and the remainder upon division 11 by 6 is 5. Not sufficient.

(2) j > 5 --> clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) k = jm + 5 and j > 5 --> direct formula of remainder as defined above --> r=5. Sufficient.

Or: k = jm + 5 --> first term jm is clearly divisible by j and 5 divided by j as (j>5) yields remainder of 5.

Answer: C.

I do not understand why the reminder is still 5....

If you have 25=20*2 + 5 than reminder is 5. But if K/J than the reminder is 5/10: 0.5 not 5. And indeed 25/10=2.5 and 2+0.5=2.5

Therefore, the value of the reminder when K is divided by J is correlated with the value of J.

This is why I answered E because we do not know the value of J.