Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 21:25 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 21:25

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Posts: 396
Own Kudos [?]: 16664 [0]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2012
Posts: 60
Own Kudos [?]: 60 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Status:MBA Aspirant
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 248 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92959
Own Kudos [?]: 619508 [1]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than s?

Either s=r+2 or r=s+2. We are asked whether we have the second case: r=s+2 --> r>s.

(1) r + 2 and s - 2 are consecutive even integers --> s>r, because if r>s then r+2 and s-2 won't be consecutive even integers. Sufficient.

Or another way: stem says that the distance between r and s is 2. Now, if r>s then the distance between r+2 and s-2 would be 6 and they won't be consecutive as (1) states. Thus it must be true that r<s.

(2) r - 1 is not equal to s + 1 --> subtract 1 from both sides in r=s+2 --> r-1=s+1. Now, we are told that this is not true, hence r=s+2 is not true, which means that r>s is not true. So, s>r. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Similar question to practice: og12-quant-2nd-ed-qn-86-consecutive-postives-126287.html

Hope it helps.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Status:Prep Mode
Posts: 138
Own Kudos [?]: 392 [0]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: India
Send PM
Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]
Bunuel,

Could you help with the below confusion regarding your explanation:

In the question, it says "consecutive even integers" so those could be positive or negative, but in the answer part you have only taken into consideration the positive even integers.My doubt is the consecutive even integers could be negative also, and could possible change the final answer as E.

Please help to clarify.

Thanks!
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92959
Own Kudos [?]: 619508 [0]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]
Expert Reply
gianprakash wrote:
Bunuel,

Could you help with the below confusion regarding your explanation:

In the question, it says "consecutive even integers" so those could be positive or negative, but in the answer part you have only taken into consideration the positive even integers.My doubt is the consecutive even integers could be negative also, and could possible change the final answer as E.

Please help to clarify.

Thanks!


In the solution above positive integers are not mentioned at all. Thus the reasoning holds true for any even r and s.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Status:Prep Mode
Posts: 138
Own Kudos [?]: 392 [0]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: India
Send PM
Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]
Thanks, got my mistake.

In general: we should plugin both positive & negative consecutive integers if not explicitly mentioned in question, as negative consecutive integers (odd or even) are very well accepted in GMAT.

Please see if I make sense here.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2014
Status:Always try to face your worst fear because nothing GOOD comes easy. You must be UNCOMFORTABLE to get to your COMFORT ZONE
Posts: 223
Own Kudos [?]: 548 [0]
Given Kudos: 471
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V25
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than s?

Either s=r+2 or r=s+2. We are asked whether we have the second case: r=s+2 --> r>s.

(1) r + 2 and s - 2 are consecutive even integers --> s>r, because if r>s then r+2 and s-2 won't be consecutive even integers. Sufficient.

Or another way: stem says that the distance between r and s is 2. Now, if r>s then the distance between r+2 and s-2 would be 6 and they won't be consecutive as (1) states. Thus it must be true that r<s.

(2) r - 1 is not equal to s + 1 --> subtract 1 from both sides in r=s+2 --> r-1=s+1. Now, we are told that this is not true, hence r=s+2 is not true, which means that r>s is not true. So, s>r. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Similar question to practice: og12-quant-2nd-ed-qn-86-consecutive-postives-126287.html

Hope it helps.


Can Someone explain Statement 1
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11183
Own Kudos [?]: 31995 [0]
Given Kudos: 291
Send PM
Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]
Expert Reply
smartguy595 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than s?

Either s=r+2 or r=s+2. We are asked whether we have the second case: r=s+2 --> r>s.

(1) r + 2 and s - 2 are consecutive even integers --> s>r, because if r>s then r+2 and s-2 won't be consecutive even integers. Sufficient.

Or another way: stem says that the distance between r and s is 2. Now, if r>s then the distance between r+2 and s-2 would be 6 and they won't be consecutive as (1) states. Thus it must be true that r<s.

(2) r - 1 is not equal to s + 1 --> subtract 1 from both sides in r=s+2 --> r-1=s+1. Now, we are told that this is not true, hence r=s+2 is not true, which means that r>s is not true. So, s>r. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Similar question to practice: og12-quant-2nd-ed-qn-86-consecutive-postives-126287.html

Hope it helps.


Can Someone explain Statement 1


Hi,
Since you ask about Stat 1, let me concentrate on that part only..
1) we know r and s are consecutive even integers..
Either r=s+2 or s=r+2..

2) from stat 1
r + 2 and s - 2 are consecutive even integers..

lets try two cases here..
a) r=s+2..
substitute in r+2= s+2+2= s+4..
NOW can s+4 and s-2 be consecutive even- NO
so s=r+2 so s>r..
b) we can try s=r+2 too..
s-2=r+2-2=r...
so s-2 and r+2 consecutive would mean r and r+2 consecutive even..
so yes s=r+2..

Hope it helps
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If r and s are consecutive even integers, is r greater than [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92959 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne