Interesting debate but guys seriously...? Some incredibly insubstantial opinions getting thrown around here. There's plenty to choose from, but a few points that caught my eye.
- "...And why on earth was George W Bush ever admitted to HBS??"
How did you get on with the critical reasoning part of the GMAT with logic and reasoning like that?
And I suppose you had first hand experience of 'dubya' while he was interviewing or a current student. Besides, when dealing with the current topic, surely Bill Clinton going to HBS would have been more of a concern (or maybe Georgetown and Oxford have endemic problems too)? The GMAT can have that one for free.
(And leave it, I'm not a republican, I just thought it was quite a funny joke)
- "When I visited HBS, the people were not very friendly or helpful. In fact, they even seemed a little cold."
Maybe, one visit, at least there's some evidence here. But from my experience, when I was there last week I was touched at the number of current students who took time out of their days and incredibly busy schedules to spend time talking to me about the school. They had warmth, spoke with great enthusiasm, and mostly about how great their fellow classmates and professors were. One partner of an admitted student during the Admitted Students Weekend was almost in tears with the generous spirit and welcome she'd been extended. So again, only a few data points but worth mentioning as a different perspective.
- "The Dean at HBS this week apologized for the sexism at HBS."
This one is an interesting one. In the full text he has apologized for past problems, not a current issue (article:
https://management.fortune.cnn.com/2014/01/29/harvard-business-dean-apologizes/). The specific apology was also about a lack of women as the subject of case study material, most of which go back a number of years.
In an incredibly open and candid Q&A session a lady asked about this last week during the Admitted Students event with a question to Youngme Moon (Associate Dean and Head of the HBS FT MBA program). I paraphrase a little, as I listened to this in a long session but part of what was said went something like this:
"It's true Nithin Nohria apologized... we have accepted at HBS that to tackle what we felt has been a historical problem we will need to make changes... To do so we knew would attract attention, and bad publicity....We couldn't allow that to be a reason not to change something we felt was wrong..."If someone else was there and has a better memory than me I'd appreciate it!
Hopefully that adds some context to the apology. And again, HBS apologizing and no-one else doing so certainly does not show that this is the one school affected (pull out your Critical Reasoning books again). It does though show it is the only school to recognize it, the first step to correcting it. I also take some confidence in the strong passionate speaking from Youngme Moon and Dee Leopold [Director of Admissions] (surely two of the most influential staff at the school, and both women). This also is a stab in the dark but I find it hard to believe Dean Nithin Nohria is either sexist or chauvinistic either...
Anyway, of course HBS has had issues, much as I'm sure other schools did.
*Opinion warning* For my part, I met roughly half of the Class of '16 last week. I was stunned by how genuine they all were, and also met a very, very low percentage where I detected any lack of humility. It was the most amazing and kind group of people I've ever had the fortune to meet. I like to think I have at least a small insight of the future as they'll all be part of the culture next year...
I hope anyone who read some of the ridiculous unsubstantiated comments above didn't put anyone else off looking a bit closer at one of the best education institutions in the world and at least making their own conclusions. I met students from several prominent business schools along the way, both in the US and Europe, and detected arrogance on several occasions. But I was realistic to accept that maybe I had at best an isolated insight and didn't feel the need to flame the places where there would be few readers with any experience to counter a pretty flawed argument.