anish777 wrote:
Hi
For the last question that is "primary purpose of the passage", why is option B correct and not option E ? I understand the fact that the author is talking about a species' diet for the most part. But he also pulls the example of baboon to show us that how the theory is not that useful and that it can lead to false conclusions.
Hi,
Im going to highlight a few points from the passage that will help you choose B over E.
Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens of the primate species australopithecine may provide evidence about their diets. - notice he says they may provide evidence. For example, on the basis of tooth micro-wear patterns, Walker dismisses Jolly’s hypothesis that australopithecines ate hard seeds. He also disputes Szalay’s suggestion that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaptation to bone crunching, since both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics on teeth. His conclusion that australopithecines were frugivores (fruit eaters) is based upon his observation that the tooth micro-wear characteristics of east African australopithecine specimens are indistinguishable from those of chimpanzees and orangutans, which are commonly assumed to be frugivorous primates.
However,
research on the diets of contemporary primates suggests that micro-wear studies may have limited utility in determining the foods that are actually eaten. - may have limited utility. Meaning that micro-wear studies do have some utility. For example, insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects. In addition, the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit; if australopithecines were omnivores too, we might expect to find considerable population variation in their tooth micro-wear patterns.
Thus, Walker’s description of possible australopithecine diets may need to be expanded to include a much more diverse diet. - may need to be expanded - this indicates that there is some use but he is qualifying the use and saying that Walkers description should be expanded.
Now read option E very carefully.
(E) arguing that a particular research methodology
does not contribute useful data
- This answer choice is extreme firstly. It is always better to avoid extreme answers. Next, as I have pointed out above the author always indicates that there is some use of the studies.
Also a research methodology means a way of doing or conducting research, the author nowhere mentions that a research methodology or anything about it not contributing useful data.
Also he is definitely not arguing about the research methodology.
Eliminate E.