Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
22 Feb 2022, 20:04
Kudos
Bookmarks
waytowharton
8. The passage is primarily concerned with
(A) comparing two research methods for determining a species' dietary habits
(B) describing and evaluating conjectures about a species' diet
(C) contrasting several explanations for a species' dietary habits
(D) discussing a new approach and advocating its use in particular situations
(E) arguing that a particular research methodology does not contribute useful data
Note what the passage says:
...research on the diets of contemporary primates suggests that micro-wear studies may have limited utility in determining the foods that are actually eaten...
Thus, Walker’s description of possible australopithecine diets may need to be expanded to include a much more diverse diet....
The author talks about limited utility and that the description may need to be expanded. He doesn't say that Walker's description is not useful. He says that utility may be limited. Hence (E) is not correct.
But he does describe the various conjectures and evaluates them (and concludes that Walker's description needs to be expanded) hence (B) is correct.
22 Feb 2022, 20:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
Para1
Walker’s hypothesis that
austra has micro-wear pattern on teeth like chimpanzee
-->chimpanzee are fruiter
-->austral are fruiter too
Para2
refute Walker’s in that micro-wear studies maybe too limited
1. insect-eating animal baboon --> also produce micro-wear pattern
-->there’re more animals produce micro-wear pattern but not fruiter
--> austral, which has micro-wear pattern, somewhat may not be fruiter and be insect-eating
2. if austra, which has micro-wear pattern on teeth, is omnivore
--> there will be lots of animals has micro-wear pattern on teeth
just logic in reverse way:
if austral not omnivore that only eat fruit as Walker suppose
--> there won’t be lots of animals like chimpanzee or orangutan has micro-wear pattern on teeth
--> thus prove the wrong view of Walker’s hypothesis and support the refutation that austral can
be omnivore not only eat fruit, as the conclusion given in the end of the paragraph
1. According to the passage, Walker and Szalay disagree on which of the following points?
(A) The structure and composition of australopithecine teeth
Neither two hypothese has mentioned these, Walker only talks about micro-wear pattern on teeth so its not related to structure of the teeth while Szalay says the bone-crunching behavior is too not related to the structure and composition of austra’s teeth
(B) The kinds of conclusions that can be drawn from the micro-wear patterns on australopithecine teeth
Only we could draw conclusion of micro-wear pattern teeth in Walker’s hypothesis, nowhere in Szalay’s could we find traces about this, thus nowhere to compare whether its their disagreement
(C) The idea that fruit was a part of the australopithecine diet
Same as (B)
(D) The extent to which seed cracking and bone crunching produce similar micro-wear patterns on teeth
Opposite to (B) and (C), this statement could only be found at Szalay’s hypothesis
(E) The function of the heavy enamel on australopithecine teeth
Walker: micro-wear pattern on teeth of austra --->evidence of their diet
Szalay: in fact, there’s no cause and effect concerning his hypothesis, its parallel among them
1. austra bone-crunching ---> lead to micro-wear pattern on austra’s tooth
2. its austra’s bone crunching ---> lead to the heavy enamel of austra’s teeth
here you could see clearly that both two agree on micro-wear pattern on teeth of austral, the dissension only appear in Szalay’s second view, so heavy enamel of austra’s teeth is the point where two disagree upon
2. The passage suggests that Walker’s research indicated which of the following about australopithecine teeth?
(A) They had micro-wear characteristics indicating that fruit constituted only a small part of their diet.
In Walker’s theory since there’s micro-wear pattern in austra’s teeth, it then concludes that austra’s only diet is fruit, thus statement in (A) is wrong
(B) They lacked micro-wear characteristics associated with seed eating and bone crunching.
Walker’s hypothesis propose that micro-wear pattern of austra’s teeth only associated with fruit eating, thus (B) correct
(C) They had micro-wear characteristics that differed in certain ways from the micro-wear patterns of chimpanzees and orangutans.
Walker’s hypothesis suggest the micro-wear pattern of austral is same as chimpanzee and organtun, wrong
(D) They had micro-wear characteristics suggesting that the diet of australopithecines varied from one region to another.
The passage hasn’t mentioned anything about the diet of austra’s varied from one region to another
(E) They lacked the micro-wear characteristics distinctive of modern frugivores.
Wrong, Walker’s theory clearly states that austra’s teeth owns the micro-wear characteristics in frugivores such as chimpanzee or organtun
3. The passage suggests that which of the following would be true of studies of tooth micro-wear patterns conducted on modern baboons?
See second refutation: insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.
(A) They would inaccurately suggest that some baboons eat more soft-bodied than hard-bodied insects.
No, the passage accurately suggest these
(B) They would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of some baboons’ diets.
According to passage, insects are the only, not the “largest part of baboons’ diets
(C) They would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns among baboon populations.
The population variation in austra’s tooth micro-wear patterns only appear in the first refutation rather than the first one
(D) They would inadequately reflect the extent to which some baboons consume certain types of insects.
Correct, the statement clearly says that baboons eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects
(E) They would indicate that baboons in certain regions eat only soft-bodied insects, whereas baboons in other regions eat hard-bodied insects.
Baboon only eats soft-bodied insects, this is the clear statement in the first refutation, thus this choice is wrong
4. The passage suggests which of the following about the micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of omnivorous primates?
In addition, the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit; if australopithecines were omnivores too, we might expect to find considerable population variation in their tooth micro-wear patterns.
(A) The patterns provide information about what kinds of foods are not eaten by the particular species of primate, but not about the foods actually eaten.
The micro-wave pattern gives no implication about what foods are or aren’t eaten by particular species
(B) The patterns of various primate species living in the same environment resemble one another.
Nowhere mention the link between micro-wave patterns of species and environment
(C) The patterns may not provide information about the extent to which a particular species’ diet includes seeds.
From the passage, the wider variety of patterns is the effect to the cause of if austras were omnivore, thus whether or not the pattern provide information anout particular species’s diet we cannot for sure
(D) The patterns provide more information about these primates’ diet than do the tooth micro-wear patterns of primates who are frugivores.
Same as (C), these are nowhere to trace
(E) The patterns may differ among groups within a species depending on the environment within which a particular group lives.
Correct, clearly correspond to the passage with regard to second refutation convey
5. It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?
For example, insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.
(A) There would be enough abrasion to allow a determination of whether baboons are frugivorous or insectivorous.
the question want to know how could we infer from the micro-wave pattern on baboon which doesn’t limit to eating habit, while choice (A) subjectively conclude that abrasion(pattern) could determine the eating habits of baboon, thus narrow down the whole scope being ask
(B) The results would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of the baboons’ diet.
Its insects are the “only” rather than “largest part” of baboon’s diet
(C) The results would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns from one regional baboon population to another.
Region doesn’t discuss in the whole passage
(D) The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.
Correct, see “tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects…..”, thus it indeed have some kind s of insects missing out in baboon’s diet
(E) The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.
the second refutation indeed give us a reason why Walker’s hypothesis concerning austra’s diet is wrong, thus the result of the study on micro-wave pattern of baboon could offer inference about austra’s diet or micro-wave pattern in that austra’s diet doesn’t only limit to fruits
6. It can be inferred from the passage that Walker’s conclusion about the australopithecine diet would be called into question under which of the following circumstances?
(A) The tooth enamel of australopithecines is found to be much heavier than that of modern frugivorous primates.
See sentences in para1 “He also disputes Szalay’s suggestion that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaptation to bone crunching, since both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics on teeth…..”, Walker deny the hypothesis of the heavy enamel of austras, but his conclusion doesn’t call into question it’s much heavier than frugivorous primates, there’s no comparing betwwen these two primates
(B) The micro-wear patterns of australopithecine teeth from regions other than east Africa are analyzed.
Same as question5, though Walker study the primates in east Africa, other regions don’t ever discuss in the whole passage
(C) Orangutans are found to have a much broader diet than is currently recognized.
Correct, notice the end of the passage that concludes “possible australopithecine diets may need to be expanded to include a much more diverse diet…..”, and as orangutan is being regard as the same as austra to their similar micro-wear pattern in paragraph 1, thus it should have a wider range of diet than we know thought
(D) The environment of east Africa at the time australopithecines lived there is found to have been far more varied than is currently thought.
Nowhere to trace this
(E) The area in which the australopithecine specimens were found is discovered to have been very rich in soft-bodied insects during the period when australopithecines lived there.
We only know from sec refutation that baboon, which also has micro-wave pattern like austra, consume soft-bodied insects, however the area austral lived are rich in these insects is nowhere talks about in the passage
7. The author of the passage mentions the diets of baboons and other living primates most likely in order to
(A) provide evidence that refutes Walker’s conclusions about the foods making
up the diets of australopithecines
two examples mention in para2 can’t be defined as “evidence”, they’re just examples to illustrate why there’s doubt concerning Walker’s hypothesis
(B) suggest that studies of tooth micro-wear patterns are primarily useful for determining the diets of living primates
Only take tooth micro-wear patterns as a tool to study the diets of living primates, no subjectively determine whether these are useful or not
(C) suggest that australopithecines were probably omnivores rather than frugivores
No suggestion concern here, the author just want to use examples raised to verify the conclusion given
(D) illustrate some of the limitations of using tooth micro-wear patterns to draw definitive conclusions about a group’s diet
Correct, Walker’s hypothesis in para1 use patterns to conclude on the primate group’s diet, then in para2 two examples raise to show the limitation, the problem, concerning with this method of researching
(E) suggest that tooth micro-wear patterns are caused by persistent, as opposed to occasional, consumption of particular foods
How micro-wear patterns were formulated by certain foraging behavior doesn’t ever in the passage
Walker’s hypothesis that
austra has micro-wear pattern on teeth like chimpanzee
-->chimpanzee are fruiter
-->austral are fruiter too
Para2
refute Walker’s in that micro-wear studies maybe too limited
1. insect-eating animal baboon --> also produce micro-wear pattern
-->there’re more animals produce micro-wear pattern but not fruiter
--> austral, which has micro-wear pattern, somewhat may not be fruiter and be insect-eating
2. if austra, which has micro-wear pattern on teeth, is omnivore
--> there will be lots of animals has micro-wear pattern on teeth
just logic in reverse way:
if austral not omnivore that only eat fruit as Walker suppose
--> there won’t be lots of animals like chimpanzee or orangutan has micro-wear pattern on teeth
--> thus prove the wrong view of Walker’s hypothesis and support the refutation that austral can
be omnivore not only eat fruit, as the conclusion given in the end of the paragraph
1. According to the passage, Walker and Szalay disagree on which of the following points?
(A) The structure and composition of australopithecine teeth
Neither two hypothese has mentioned these, Walker only talks about micro-wear pattern on teeth so its not related to structure of the teeth while Szalay says the bone-crunching behavior is too not related to the structure and composition of austra’s teeth
(B) The kinds of conclusions that can be drawn from the micro-wear patterns on australopithecine teeth
Only we could draw conclusion of micro-wear pattern teeth in Walker’s hypothesis, nowhere in Szalay’s could we find traces about this, thus nowhere to compare whether its their disagreement
(C) The idea that fruit was a part of the australopithecine diet
Same as (B)
(D) The extent to which seed cracking and bone crunching produce similar micro-wear patterns on teeth
Opposite to (B) and (C), this statement could only be found at Szalay’s hypothesis
(E) The function of the heavy enamel on australopithecine teeth
Walker: micro-wear pattern on teeth of austra --->evidence of their diet
Szalay: in fact, there’s no cause and effect concerning his hypothesis, its parallel among them
1. austra bone-crunching ---> lead to micro-wear pattern on austra’s tooth
2. its austra’s bone crunching ---> lead to the heavy enamel of austra’s teeth
here you could see clearly that both two agree on micro-wear pattern on teeth of austral, the dissension only appear in Szalay’s second view, so heavy enamel of austra’s teeth is the point where two disagree upon
2. The passage suggests that Walker’s research indicated which of the following about australopithecine teeth?
(A) They had micro-wear characteristics indicating that fruit constituted only a small part of their diet.
In Walker’s theory since there’s micro-wear pattern in austra’s teeth, it then concludes that austra’s only diet is fruit, thus statement in (A) is wrong
(B) They lacked micro-wear characteristics associated with seed eating and bone crunching.
Walker’s hypothesis propose that micro-wear pattern of austra’s teeth only associated with fruit eating, thus (B) correct
(C) They had micro-wear characteristics that differed in certain ways from the micro-wear patterns of chimpanzees and orangutans.
Walker’s hypothesis suggest the micro-wear pattern of austral is same as chimpanzee and organtun, wrong
(D) They had micro-wear characteristics suggesting that the diet of australopithecines varied from one region to another.
The passage hasn’t mentioned anything about the diet of austra’s varied from one region to another
(E) They lacked the micro-wear characteristics distinctive of modern frugivores.
Wrong, Walker’s theory clearly states that austra’s teeth owns the micro-wear characteristics in frugivores such as chimpanzee or organtun
3. The passage suggests that which of the following would be true of studies of tooth micro-wear patterns conducted on modern baboons?
See second refutation: insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.
(A) They would inaccurately suggest that some baboons eat more soft-bodied than hard-bodied insects.
No, the passage accurately suggest these
(B) They would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of some baboons’ diets.
According to passage, insects are the only, not the “largest part of baboons’ diets
(C) They would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns among baboon populations.
The population variation in austra’s tooth micro-wear patterns only appear in the first refutation rather than the first one
(D) They would inadequately reflect the extent to which some baboons consume certain types of insects.
Correct, the statement clearly says that baboons eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects
(E) They would indicate that baboons in certain regions eat only soft-bodied insects, whereas baboons in other regions eat hard-bodied insects.
Baboon only eats soft-bodied insects, this is the clear statement in the first refutation, thus this choice is wrong
4. The passage suggests which of the following about the micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of omnivorous primates?
In addition, the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit; if australopithecines were omnivores too, we might expect to find considerable population variation in their tooth micro-wear patterns.
(A) The patterns provide information about what kinds of foods are not eaten by the particular species of primate, but not about the foods actually eaten.
The micro-wave pattern gives no implication about what foods are or aren’t eaten by particular species
(B) The patterns of various primate species living in the same environment resemble one another.
Nowhere mention the link between micro-wave patterns of species and environment
(C) The patterns may not provide information about the extent to which a particular species’ diet includes seeds.
From the passage, the wider variety of patterns is the effect to the cause of if austras were omnivore, thus whether or not the pattern provide information anout particular species’s diet we cannot for sure
(D) The patterns provide more information about these primates’ diet than do the tooth micro-wear patterns of primates who are frugivores.
Same as (C), these are nowhere to trace
(E) The patterns may differ among groups within a species depending on the environment within which a particular group lives.
Correct, clearly correspond to the passage with regard to second refutation convey
5. It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?
For example, insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.
(A) There would be enough abrasion to allow a determination of whether baboons are frugivorous or insectivorous.
the question want to know how could we infer from the micro-wave pattern on baboon which doesn’t limit to eating habit, while choice (A) subjectively conclude that abrasion(pattern) could determine the eating habits of baboon, thus narrow down the whole scope being ask
(B) The results would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of the baboons’ diet.
Its insects are the “only” rather than “largest part” of baboon’s diet
(C) The results would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns from one regional baboon population to another.
Region doesn’t discuss in the whole passage
(D) The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.
Correct, see “tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects…..”, thus it indeed have some kind s of insects missing out in baboon’s diet
(E) The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.
the second refutation indeed give us a reason why Walker’s hypothesis concerning austra’s diet is wrong, thus the result of the study on micro-wave pattern of baboon could offer inference about austra’s diet or micro-wave pattern in that austra’s diet doesn’t only limit to fruits
6. It can be inferred from the passage that Walker’s conclusion about the australopithecine diet would be called into question under which of the following circumstances?
(A) The tooth enamel of australopithecines is found to be much heavier than that of modern frugivorous primates.
See sentences in para1 “He also disputes Szalay’s suggestion that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaptation to bone crunching, since both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics on teeth…..”, Walker deny the hypothesis of the heavy enamel of austras, but his conclusion doesn’t call into question it’s much heavier than frugivorous primates, there’s no comparing betwwen these two primates
(B) The micro-wear patterns of australopithecine teeth from regions other than east Africa are analyzed.
Same as question5, though Walker study the primates in east Africa, other regions don’t ever discuss in the whole passage
(C) Orangutans are found to have a much broader diet than is currently recognized.
Correct, notice the end of the passage that concludes “possible australopithecine diets may need to be expanded to include a much more diverse diet…..”, and as orangutan is being regard as the same as austra to their similar micro-wear pattern in paragraph 1, thus it should have a wider range of diet than we know thought
(D) The environment of east Africa at the time australopithecines lived there is found to have been far more varied than is currently thought.
Nowhere to trace this
(E) The area in which the australopithecine specimens were found is discovered to have been very rich in soft-bodied insects during the period when australopithecines lived there.
We only know from sec refutation that baboon, which also has micro-wave pattern like austra, consume soft-bodied insects, however the area austral lived are rich in these insects is nowhere talks about in the passage
7. The author of the passage mentions the diets of baboons and other living primates most likely in order to
(A) provide evidence that refutes Walker’s conclusions about the foods making
up the diets of australopithecines
two examples mention in para2 can’t be defined as “evidence”, they’re just examples to illustrate why there’s doubt concerning Walker’s hypothesis
(B) suggest that studies of tooth micro-wear patterns are primarily useful for determining the diets of living primates
Only take tooth micro-wear patterns as a tool to study the diets of living primates, no subjectively determine whether these are useful or not
(C) suggest that australopithecines were probably omnivores rather than frugivores
No suggestion concern here, the author just want to use examples raised to verify the conclusion given
(D) illustrate some of the limitations of using tooth micro-wear patterns to draw definitive conclusions about a group’s diet
Correct, Walker’s hypothesis in para1 use patterns to conclude on the primate group’s diet, then in para2 two examples raise to show the limitation, the problem, concerning with this method of researching
(E) suggest that tooth micro-wear patterns are caused by persistent, as opposed to occasional, consumption of particular foods
How micro-wear patterns were formulated by certain foraging behavior doesn’t ever in the passage
13 Apr 2022, 20:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello Sir GMATNinja and also tagging other legends @VeritasKarishma and AndrewN (Whoever can spare some time on this) -
I am confused with QN 1, Why C is wrong and E is correct?
Usually for disagree questions, I read the statement and decide whether there's a mismatch b/w both parties on an issue.
I eliminated E quickly because I thought Walker never went into the specifics of the function of the enamel.
Whereas in C it says "The idea that fruit was a part of the australopithecine diet"
Walker - He agrees that australopithecines were fruit eaters
Szalay - Enamel due to bone crunching, so not fruit eaters
So there's a agreement and disagreement, what am I missing? Is it because Walker thinks fruit formed the majority of the diet and Szalay did not discounted the possibility that fruit can be part of the diet with enamel evidence showing Bone/meat to also be part of the diet? Is this why this answer choice is wrong?
Even then, I am not convinced where Walker talked about the "Function" of enamel directly?
Thanks.
I am confused with QN 1, Why C is wrong and E is correct?
Usually for disagree questions, I read the statement and decide whether there's a mismatch b/w both parties on an issue.
I eliminated E quickly because I thought Walker never went into the specifics of the function of the enamel.
Whereas in C it says "The idea that fruit was a part of the australopithecine diet"
Walker - He agrees that australopithecines were fruit eaters
Szalay - Enamel due to bone crunching, so not fruit eaters
So there's a agreement and disagreement, what am I missing? Is it because Walker thinks fruit formed the majority of the diet and Szalay did not discounted the possibility that fruit can be part of the diet with enamel evidence showing Bone/meat to also be part of the diet? Is this why this answer choice is wrong?
Even then, I am not convinced where Walker talked about the "Function" of enamel directly?
Thanks.
GMATNinja
