Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 21:08 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 21:08

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 655-705 Levelx   Sciencex   Short Passagex                           
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2016
Status:Persevere
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 3604 [202]
Given Kudos: 94
Location: Hong Kong
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.52
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63669 [50]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Posts: 755
Own Kudos [?]: 2224 [26]
Given Kudos: 139
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 2.77
WE:General Management (Other)
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Oct 2015
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [2]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Hi Can someone pls explain why answer to Q 104 is C?
Thanks
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 May 2016
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 48
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
1
Kudos
dsheth7 wrote:
Hi Can someone pls explain why answer to Q 104 is C?
Thanks


Walker's theory is that "a" (australopithecine) were fruit eaters because they had "indistinguishable" tooth micro-wear characteristics from orangutans, who "are commonly assumed to be [fruit eaters]."

His theory would be called into question if this correlation was somehow inaccurate or not conclusive. Hence the word "assumed to be" because they are not entirely certain that this is accurate.

A) There's no mention of the heaviness or density of the tooth. Out of Scoop
B) It would be interesting to see if other areas had the same results. If they did, then it would support his claim but if they didn't, then it wouldn't. It's not definite enough to answer this question.
C) If orangutans were found to be eating other things besides fruits, such as seeds or insects, then Walker's theory of "a" being only fruit eaters would be incorrect. Correct
D) A varied environment could or could not change the theory so like B, it's not definite enough to weaken his claim.
E) Even if there were soft-bodied bugs, it does not mean they ate it or maybe it does. Again, like B and C, it can go both ways so it's incorrect.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2016
Posts: 56
Own Kudos [?]: 26 [2]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Hi @Gmatninja, Experts,

Could you please explain why option E is incorrect for Question 5 ( Book Q# 99)

Option E says: The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

If we can not infer anything concrete from the studies of tooth micro wear patterns, THEN, WHY is it incorrect to INFER that results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the austraXYZ diet can or cannot be drawn.

IS there ANY ASSUMPTION or LEAP which i have taken to think that OPtion E is correct ?

Thanks
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63669 [17]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
11
Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Quote:
(Book Question: 99)
It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?
A. There would be enough abrasion to allow a determination of whether baboons are frugivorous or insectivorous.
B. The results would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of the baboons’ diet.
C. The results would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns from one regional baboon population to another.
D. The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.
E. The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

kunal1608 wrote:
Hi GMATNinja, Experts,

Could you please explain why option E is incorrect for Question 5 ( Book Q# 99)

Option E says: The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

If we can not infer anything concrete from the studies of tooth micro wear patterns, THEN, WHY is it incorrect to INFER that results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the austraXYZ diet can or cannot be drawn.

IS there ANY ASSUMPTION or LEAP which i have taken to think that OPtion E is correct ?

Thanks

Modern baboons eat insects (only soft-bodied). But if we study micro-wear patterns on their teeth, we would NOT find evidence that they eat insects (micro-wear studies would only provide evidence of eating insects if the baboons ate HARD-bodied insects). So, from a micro-wear study, we CANNOT conclude whether an animal eats insects.

Thus, the baboon micro-wear study would LIKELY provide evidence that information about insect consumption cannot be determined from micro-wear studies. In other words, the study would LIKELY provide an indication that you CANNOT draw insect-consumption inferences from micro-wear studies.

If choice (E) said "likely" instead of "unlikely", it would be correct. But, as is, (E) is incorrect (tricky!).

(D) is the best answer.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2016
Posts: 56
Own Kudos [?]: 26 [2]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
2
Kudos
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
(Book Question: 99)
It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?
A. There would be enough abrasion to allow a determination of whether baboons are frugivorous or insectivorous.
B. The results would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of the baboons’ diet.
C. The results would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns from one regional baboon population to another.
D. The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.
E. The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

kunal1608 wrote:
Hi GMATNinja, Experts,

Could you please explain why option E is incorrect for Question 5 ( Book Q# 99)

Option E says: The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

If we can not infer anything concrete from the studies of tooth micro wear patterns, THEN, WHY is it incorrect to INFER that results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the austraXYZ diet can or cannot be drawn.

IS there ANY ASSUMPTION or LEAP which i have taken to think that OPtion E is correct ?

Thanks

Modern baboons eat insects (only soft-bodied). But if we study micro-wear patterns on their teeth, we would NOT find evidence that they eat insects (micro-wear studies would only provide evidence of eating insects if the baboons ate HARD-bodied insects). So, from a micro-wear study, we CANNOT conclude whether an animal eats insects.

Thus, the baboon micro-wear study would LIKELY provide evidence that information about insect consumption cannot be determined from micro-wear studies. In other words, the study would LIKELY provide an indication that you CANNOT draw insect-consumption inferences from micro-wear studies.

If choice (E) said "likely" instead of "unlikely", it would be correct. But, as is, (E) is incorrect (tricky!).

(D) is the best answer.


Thanks a lot for the explanation

Its still quite hard to understand :( , Could you please help me break down Statement E further .

I understand this part :"we CANNOT conclude whether an animal eats insects."

Is What you mean to say that if option E was drafted as : "The results would be likely to provide SOME indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies" . THEN It would be correct ?

Please Explain !

Thanks
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 84 [2]
Given Kudos: 147
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Quote:
2. The passage suggests that Walker’s research indicated which of the following about australopithecine teeth?

(A) They had micro-wear characteristics indicating that fruit constituted only a small part of their diet.
(B) They lacked micro-wear characteristics associated with seed eating and bone crunching.
(C) They had micro-wear characteristics that differed in certain ways from the micro-wear patterns of chimpanzees and orangutans.
(D) They had micro-wear characteristics suggesting that the diet of australopithecines varied from one region to another.
(E) They lacked the micro-wear characteristics distinctive of modern frugivores.


Hi mikemcgarry, GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja, MagooshExpert Carolyn,
sayantanc2
VeritasPrepKarishma

I am curious about E,
Does "lack distinctive" mean indistinctive or similar?
That's why i picked up E,

Please clarify.

Thanks in advance
Have a lovely day.
>_~
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63669 [3]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
KGump wrote:
Quote:
(Book Question: 99)
It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?
A. There would be enough abrasion to allow a determination of whether baboons are frugivorous or insectivorous.
B. The results would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of the baboons’ diet.
C. The results would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns from one regional baboon population to another.
D. The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.
E. The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

GMATNinja wrote:
Modern baboons eat insects (only soft-bodied). But if we study micro-wear patterns on their teeth, we would NOT find evidence that they eat insects (micro-wear studies would only provide evidence of eating insects if the baboons ate HARD-bodied insects). So, from a micro-wear study, we CANNOT conclude whether an animal eats insects.

Thus, the baboon micro-wear study would LIKELY provide evidence that information about insect consumption cannot be determined from micro-wear studies. In other words, the study would LIKELY provide an indication that you CANNOT draw insect-consumption inferences from micro-wear studies.

If choice (E) said "likely" instead of "unlikely", it would be correct. But, as is, (E) is incorrect (tricky!).

(D) is the best answer.

Thanks a lot for the explanation

Its still quite hard to understand :( , Could you please help me break down Statement E further .

I understand this part :"we CANNOT conclude whether an animal eats insects."

Is What you mean to say that if option E was drafted as : "The results would be likely to provide SOME indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies" . THEN It would be correct ?

Please Explain !

Thanks

You're on the right track, and we don't need to change the wording that much. The following change would be sufficient to make (E) an attractive choice:

    The results would be likely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

As it stands, (E) claims that a baboon micro-wear study is unlikely to identify anything that can be inferred or cannot be inferred about australopithecine diet. This is incorrect because we know that modern baboons' consumption of (soft-bodied) insects cannot be inferred from a micro-wear study.

Therefore, a modern baboon micro-wear study on baboons actually is likely to identify anything (at least one thing) that cannot be inferred from a micro-wear study: whether or not australopithecines ate insects.

And yeah, it's a painfully constructed answer choice. :)

zoezhuyan wrote:
Quote:
2. The passage suggests that Walker’s research indicated which of the following about australopithecine teeth?

(A) They had micro-wear characteristics indicating that fruit constituted only a small part of their diet.
(B) They lacked micro-wear characteristics associated with seed eating and bone crunching.
(C) They had micro-wear characteristics that differed in certain ways from the micro-wear patterns of chimpanzees and orangutans.
(D) They had micro-wear characteristics suggesting that the diet of australopithecines varied from one region to another.
(E) They lacked the micro-wear characteristics distinctive of modern frugivores.

I am curious about E,
Does "lack distinctive" mean indistinctive or similar?
That's why i picked up E,

Please clarify.

"Distinctive of" is the same as "characteristic of" or "belonging to." (E) says that australopithecine teeth lacked the micro-wear characteristics characteristic of modern frugivores. In other words, australopithecine teeth didn't have the same micro-wear characteristics that the modern frugivore teeth have.

Walker said no such thing. In fact, Walker concluded that australopithecines were frugivores because he had observed that the tooth micro-wear characteristics of east African australopithecine specimens are indistinguishable from those of the primates that are commonly assumed to be frugivores. That's why we eliminate (E).
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1267
Own Kudos [?]: 5650 [4]
Given Kudos: 416
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
4
Kudos
P1 - a theory; disputed 2 claims; evidence given.
P2 - evidence that theory may not be correct.
Main point - a theory is given but disputed later one with evidence.

1. According to the passage, Walker and Szalay disagree on which of the following points?
p1- He also disputes Szalay’s suggestion that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaptation to bone crunching,
(E) The function of the heavy enamel on australopithecine teeth

-------------------------------------------
2. The passage suggests that Walker’s research indicated which of the following about australopithecine teeth?
p1
(B) They lacked micro-wear characteristics associated with seed eating and bone crunching. - no doubt about it.

-------------------------------------------
3. The passage suggests that which of the following would be true of studies of tooth micro-wear patterns conducted on modern baboons?
p2 - would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.

(D) They would inadequately reflect the extent to which some baboons consume certain types of insects. -
------------------------------------------
4. The passage suggests which of the following about the micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of omnivorous primates?

the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit; if australopithecines were omnivores too, we might expect to find considerable population variation in their tooth micro-wear patterns.

(E) The patterns may differ among groups within a species depending on the environment within which a particular group lives.

-------------------------------------------

5. It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?

p2 - For example, insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.
(D) The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.

-------------------------------------------

6. It can be inferred from the passage that Walker’s conclusion about the australopithecine diet would be called into question under which of the following circumstances?
P1 - His conclusion that australopithecines were frugivores (fruit eaters) is based upon his observation that the tooth micro-wear characteristics of east African australopithecine specimens are indistinguishable from those of chimpanzees and orangutans, which are commonly assumed to be frugivorous primates.

(C) Orangutans are found to have a much broader diet than is currently recognized. - if so, walker for sure wrong as both tooth tear are same then diet should also be same.

--------------------------------------------

7. The author of the passage mentions the diets of baboons and other living primates most likely in order to
p2 - mainly to describe the limitations of study in question.

(D) illustrate some of the limitations of using tooth micro-wear patterns to draw definitive conclusions about a group’s diet
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Posts: 96
Own Kudos [?]: 89 [0]
Given Kudos: 137
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44 (Online)
GPA: 3.98
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
Why is option b wrong in question 1?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63669 [3]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
aalakshaya wrote:
Why is option b wrong in question 1?

See this previous explanation of question #1, and then let's talk specifically about option (B):

GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
(Book Question: 95)
According to the passage, Walker and Szalay disagree on which of the following points?
A. The structure and composition of australopithecine teeth
B. The kinds of conclusions that can be drawn from the micro-wear patterns on australopithecine teeth
C. The idea that fruit was a part of the australopithecine diet
D. The extent to which seed cracking and bone crunching produce similar micro-wear patterns on teeth
E. The function of the heavy enamel on australopithecine teeth


The key to this question can be found in the following sentence: "He also disputes Szalay’s suggestion that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaptation to bone crunching, since both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics on teeth."

In other words, according to Walker, if those primates had in fact used their teeth for bone crunching, then the teeth should show distinctive micro-wear characteristics. We can infer that such micro-wear characteristics are NOT present on the teeth, so Walker disputes the theory that primates developed hard enamel as an adaptation to bone crunching.

Walker says that both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics, but he does NOT say that those characteristics are necessarily the same for both. Also, the passage tells us nothing about Szalay's opinion on the similarities between the patterns produced by seed cracking and those produced by bone crunching, so we have no idea whether the two agree or disagree. Thus, we can rule out (D)

Szalay apparently did not take the micro-wear evidence into account when developing his/her theory. Walker, on the other hand, does consider the micro-wear evidence and, as a result, disagrees with Szalay's theory regarding the function of the heavy enamel on the teeth.
(E) is the best answer.


Answer choice (B) states that Walker and Szalay disagree on "the kinds of conclusions that can be drawn from the micro-wear patterns on australopithecine teeth." We don't know whether or not this is true because the passage never reveals what Szalay thinks about micro-wear patterns. Szalay developed a theory for why australopithecone teeth had heavy enamel, but s/he never weighed in on the evidence of micro-wear patterns on those teeth. Answer (B) is out.

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Mar 2019
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
For question 6/100, It can be inferred from the passage that Walker’s conclusion about the australopithecine diet would be called into question under which of the following circumstances? Why the option E) is wrong?

My thought is that, soft-bodied insects are not leaving any micro-wear pattern. So if there were a lot of such insects around, there was no way to tell whether australopithecine ate those insects or not. It can be they eat fruit like orangutans as well as soft-bodied insects.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63669 [8]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
5
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
yunbao wrote:
For question 6/100, It can be inferred from the passage that Walker’s conclusion about the australopithecine diet would be called into question under which of the following circumstances? Why the option E) is wrong?

My thought is that, soft-bodied insects are not leaving any micro-wear pattern. So if there were a lot of such insects around, there was no way to tell whether australopithecine ate those insects or not. It can be they eat fruit like orangutans as well as soft-bodied insects.

Quote:
6. It can be inferred from the passage that Walker’s conclusion about the australopithecine diet would be called into question under which of the following circumstances?

(A) The tooth enamel of australopithecines is found to be much heavier than that of modern frugivorous primates.
(B) The micro-wear patterns of australopithecine teeth from regions other than east Africa are analyzed.
(C) Orangutans are found to have a much broader diet than is currently recognized.
(D) The environment of east Africa at the time australopithecines lived there is found to have been far more varied than is currently thought.
(E) The area in which the australopithecine specimens were found is discovered to have been very rich in soft-bodied insects during the period when australopithecines lived there.

First, let's discuss option (C). The passage specifically tells us that "[Walker's] conclusion that australopithecines were frugivores (fruit eaters) is based upon his observation that the tooth micro-wear characteristics of east African australopithecine specimens are indistinguishable from those of chimpanzees and orangutans, which are commonly assumed to be frugivorous primates."

Phew, that's a mouthful, but it breaks down Walker's logic:

  • East African australopithecine teeth have the same micro-wear patterns as chimp/orangutan teeth.
  • Chimps/orangutans are fruit eaters.
  • Therefore, australopithecines were also fruit eaters.

Choice (C) directly contradicts the second bullet. If orangutans ate much more than just fruit, then Walker's logic completely falls apart--the fact that australopithecine and orangutan teeth have similar patterns would NOT suggest that the australopithecines were fruit eaters. That makes (C) a solid answer.

Choice (E), on the other hand, while tempting, does not affect Walker's logic. Sure, there may have been a ton of soft-bodied insects around. There may have also been an abundance of seeds, wheat, small rodents, pizza trees (if only that were a real thing!), sushi bushes, etc., but that doesn't mean that the australopithecines actually ATE those things. Sure, if soft-bodied insects were NOT around, we would have solid evidence that the australopithecines did NOT eat them. However, the presence of soft-bodied insects, without any other evidence, does not call Walker's conclusion into question.

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2016
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 37
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
GMATNinja, aragonn

Why is option C of Qs 95 incorrect?
I understand that we can not deduce if there is regional variation in diets because we don't know if baboons are omnivores. However, even if there was regional variation, the diet must still be soft insects (but maybe different types) as it is mentioned diet consists of 'only' softbodied insects. We know that soft insects (any) don't produce much teeth abrasions.

Hence there should be no significant difference in tooth microwear patterns from region to region


Can you please help me understand where am I wrong in the analysis?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2016
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 37
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
Why is option C of Qs 95 incorrect?
I understand that we can not deduce if there is regional variation in diets because we don't know if baboons are omnivores. However, even if there was regional variation, the diet must still be soft insects (but maybe different types) as it is mentioned diet consists of 'only' softbodied insects. We know that soft insects (any) don't produce much teeth abrasions.

Hence there should be no significant difference in tooth microwear patterns from region to region


Can you please help me understand where am I wrong in the analysis?
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 778
Own Kudos [?]: 396 [1]
Given Kudos: 2198
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
this is a type of passage we should know. the passage is easy to understand but the questions are hard. quesions are hard because they require high level of inference. we need to infer the information needed from the information in one or two sentences in the passage. this inference can be difficult , making a hard question even if the passage is easy .

so, two thing needed to be done. ability to understand the passage and ability to infer. both need practice.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63669 [2]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Bhavyam wrote:
Why is option C of Qs 95 incorrect?
I understand that we can not deduce if there is regional variation in diets because we don't know if baboons are omnivores. However, even if there was regional variation, the diet must still be soft insects (but maybe different types) as it is mentioned diet consists of 'only' softbodied insects. We know that soft insects (any) don't produce much teeth abrasions.

Hence there should be no significant difference in tooth microwear patterns from region to region


Can you please help me understand where am I wrong in the analysis?

Just to clarify, are you asking about question #3/book question #97? If so, read below:

According to the passage, modern baboons eat "eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects." This does not mean that they eat exclusively soft-bodied insects -- it just means that they certainly do not eat hard-bodied insects. They could eat only soft-bodied insects, or they could eat soft-bodied insects and fruit, or soft-bodied insects and boney animals, etc.

So while the insects consumed by modern baboons would not cause tooth abrasion, other factors (e.g., bone-crunching), could do so. Perhaps certain populations of modern baboons are bone-crunchers, while others are not. This would result in "significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns among baboon populations," so (C) is out.

I hope that helps!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2019
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [0]
Given Kudos: 112
Send PM
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
GMATNinja wrote:
mynamegoeson wrote:
Question #1 why not D?
Question #3 How to chose D over C
Question #5 why C is incorrect


Quote:
(Book Question: 95)
According to the passage, Walker and Szalay disagree on which of the following points?
A. The structure and composition of australopithecine teeth
B. The kinds of conclusions that can be drawn from the micro-wear patterns on australopithecine teeth
C. The idea that fruit was a part of the australopithecine diet
D. The extent to which seed cracking and bone crunching produce similar micro-wear patterns on teeth
E. The function of the heavy enamel on australopithecine teeth

The key to this question can be found in the following sentence: "He also disputes Szalay’s suggestion that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaptation to bone crunching, since both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics on teeth."

In other words, according to Walker, if those primates had in fact used their teeth for bone crunching, then the teeth should show distinctive micro-wear characteristics. We can infer that such micro-wear characteristics are NOT present on the teeth, so Walker disputes the theory that primates developed hard enamel as an adaptation to bone crunching.

Walker says that both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics, but he does NOT say that those characteristics are necessarily the same for both. Also, the passage tells us nothing about Szalay's opinion on the similarities between the patterns produced by seed cracking and those produced by bone crunching, so we have no idea whether the two agree or disagree. Thus, we can rule out (D)

Szalay apparently did not take the micro-wear evidence into account when developing his/her theory. Walker, on the other hand, does consider the micro-wear evidence and, as a result, disagrees with Szalay's theory regarding the function of the heavy enamel on the teeth.

(E) is the best answer.

Quote:
(Book Question: 97)
The passage suggests that which of the following would be true of studies of tooth micro-wear patterns conducted on modern baboons?
A. They would inaccurately suggest that some baboons eat more soft-bodied than hard-bodied insects.
B. They would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of some baboons’ diets.
C. They would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns among baboon populations.
D. They would inadequately reflect the extent to which some baboons consume certain types of insects.
E. They would indicate that baboons in certain regions eat only soft-bodied insects, whereas baboons in other regions eat hard-bodied insects.


We are told that " the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit." If modern baboons are omnivorous, then their diets would vary considerably from group to group depending on environment. Thus, the groups would have different micro-wear patterns. The passage doesn't tell us whether baboons are omnivorous, but it does not give us information to conclude whether the micro-wear patterns of different baboon populations would be similar or varying. (C) can be eliminated.

We are also told that, "insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects." In other words, even eating tons and tons of soft-bodied insects would not cause any abrasion or micro-wear patterns on the teeth of modern baboons. Thus, based on the micro-wear patterns alone, we would not know whether those baboons ate tons of soft-bodied insects or ate no insects at all. The micro-wear patterns would not adequately reflect the extent to which the baboons consumed soft-bodied insects, so choice (D) is the best answer.

Quote:
(Book Question: 99)
It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?
A. There would be enough abrasion to allow a determination of whether baboons are frugivorous or insectivorous.
B. The results would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of the baboons’ diet.
C. The results would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns from one regional baboon population to another.
D. The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.
E. The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

As explained for the previous question, we do not know whether the micro-wear patterns of different baboon populations would be similar or varying, so (C) can be eliminated.

We do know that those baboons eat only soft-bodied insects and not hard-bodied insects. Their teeth would NOT show micro-wear patterns that would result from eating hard-bodied insects. Thus, the LACK of such micro-wear patterns would be an "accurate indication of the absence of some kind of insects (hard-bodied insects) from the baboons' diet." (D) is the best answer.

I hope this helps!


Dear GMATNinja,

I think the key to why I got Question 97 and 99 incorrectly was because I had a hard time thinking abrasion = microwear, since abrasion sounds very serious whereas microwear are just... micro. But apparently, from your explanation, they are the same thing.

The way I interpret this sentence is as followed:
Quote:
For example, insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns (which are mild although distinctive), would not cause much tooth abrasion (however, it would STILL cause mild, micro-wear patterns) in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.


I know now that my interpretation above is inaccurate. However, how can I tell in the future? Is it because of the use of "can" in "can cause distinct micro-wear" indicates that causing distinct micro-wear is a general thing, where as "would not" talks about this specific case?

I wish they said "which ALTHOUGH can cause distinct micro-wear patterns", making it easier to understand that micro-wear pattern is the same thing as tooth abrasion. :(
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of long-extinct specimens o [#permalink]
 1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne