Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:32 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Science|   Short Passage|                           
User avatar
nalinnair
Joined: 09 Jan 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2024
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
4,389
 [284]
Given Kudos: 94
Status:Persevere
Location: Hong Kong
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.52
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Posts: 107
Kudos: 4,389
 [284]
36
Kudos
Add Kudos
246
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [53]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [53]
36
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Gmatsaiyan
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Last visit: 08 Aug 2022
Posts: 754
Own Kudos:
2,710
 [29]
Given Kudos: 139
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 2.77
WE:General Management (Other)
22
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [8]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [8]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 8


TANYADILBAGHI1509
Hi GMATNinja
I am having a hard time answering the question pertaining to the main point or the primary concern of the author (Q8)

8. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) comparing two research methods for determining a species' dietary habits
(B) describing and evaluating conjectures about a species' diet
(C) contrasting several explanations for a species' dietary habits
(D) discussing a new approach and advocating its use in particular situations
(E) arguing that a particular research methodology does not contribute useful data

I selected option C and I am not able to see why Bis the correct choice. If you could help me clear my doubts between B and C , that would be great.

Thanks in advance :)

Gauriii
GMATNinjaTwo - Dear Sir, Can you please explain wy the answer to below option is B and not E? I could not find this Q discussed above and hence am posting it-

8. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) comparing two research methods for determining a species' dietary habits>>>>> there are not two research methods, hence wrong
(B) describing and evaluating conjectures about a species' diet????
(C) contrasting several explanations for a species' dietary habits>>>>no explanations as such, hence wrong
(D) discussing a new approach and advocating its use in particular situations>>>>>no new approach discussed, hence wrong
(E) arguing that a particular research methodology does not contribute useful data?????

IMO option E can also be right since in the last statement the Author is saying that the data set needs to be more elaborative... hence implying that this particular research in the passage is not contributing useful data. Hence E.

Thanks in advance.
To answer broad questions like question 8, first breakdown the structure of the passage as a whole:

Paragraph 1:

  • First, the author introduces a new form of evidence (micro-wear patterns) that may shed light on an issue (the diets of australopithecines).
  • Then, the author discusses the findings of a scholar (Walker) who uses this new form of evidence

Paragraph 2:

  • The author argues that this new form of evidence may have "limited utility."
  • Based on this discussion, the author says that Walker's conclusion may not be totally accurate

Overall, the author is primarily concerned with evaluating Walker's findings about the diets of australopithecines. To justify this evaluation, the author discusses the validity of Walker's use of micro-wear patterns.

Let's see how the answer choices stack up to this analysis. The passage is primarily concerned with:
Quote:
(A) comparing two research methods for determining a species' dietary habits
The passage focuses heavily on one method for determining a species' dietary habits -- namely, micro-wear patterns. The passage doesn't compare this method to another method, so (A) can be eliminated.

Quote:
(B) describing and evaluating conjectures about a species' diet
The author describes Walker's conjectures in detail, and then says that these ideas may not be well-supported. The primary concern of the passage is this evaluation of Walker's findings, and the methods he used to reach those findings.

(B) is looking good, let's keep it for now.

Quote:
(C) contrasting several explanations for a species' dietary habits
The author never gives explanations for the dietary habits of australopithecines -- did they eat fruit because it's healthy? Did they eat bugs because they're delicious? Did they not crunch bones because they wanted to use those bones as tools?

We have no idea why they ate what they ate, because that is simply not the author's primary concern. Instead, he/she focuses on what they may have eaten or not eaten, and the strength of the evidence behind that determination.

Because the author doesn't delve into the reasons for the diet of a species, (C) is out.

Quote:
(D) discussing a new approach and advocating its use in particular situations
The author definitely discusses a new approach, but is not primarily concerned with advocating its use. Instead, the author really isn't too thrilled about the new approach -- he/she actually says that the approach has "limited utility," and questions the validity of Walker's findings that are based on the new approach.

Eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) arguing that a particular research methodology does not contribute useful data
The author certainly criticizes a particular research methodology -- but doesn't go so far as to say that it does not contribute useful data. Even if micro-wear patterns offer only "limited utility," they may have some value.

In addition, the reason that the author even discusses the validity of micro-wear patterns is, at the end of the day, to evaluate Walker's findings. So even if the author does cast doubt on the methodology, his/her primary concern is to assess the strength of Walker's argument.

We can eliminate (E) because it isn't fully supported by the passage, and doesn't capture the author's primary purpose anyway.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [4]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 6


willacethis
Why is option D wrong in question 6?

I understand that option D does not use the logic that Walter used to derive his conclusion. However, as in case of CR, isn't a new information eligible to weaken a conclusion?

In this question, the new information would be Option D (The environment of east Africa at the time australopithecines lived there is found to have been far more varied than is currently thought)
This question is NOT asking, "Which of the answer choices, if true, most weakens Walker's conclusion?"

The question asks us what can be inferred.

So when answering this question, we are not assuming each choice to be true and then asking if that choice would weaken the conclusion.
We are identifying which choice would call Walker's conclusion into question, based on information in the passage itself.

Walker's conclusion is that australopithecines were frugivores. Here's how Walker reaches the conclusion in paragraph one:

  • The tooth micro-wear characteristics of east African australopithecine specimens are indistinguishable from those of chimpanzees and orangutans.
  • Chimpanzees and orangutans are commonly assumed to be frugivorous primates.
  • Therefore, australopithecines were frugivores.

willacethis
Now, since the passage suggests that new environment can result in variation in tooth micro-wear patterns, why does option D not weaken Walker's conclusion that "australopithecines were frugivores (fruit eaters)" which is based upon his observation regarding the tooth micro-wear characteristics of east African australopithecine.

What if east African australopithecine not chosen by Walker for his observation have different micro-wear patterns, indicating to a different conclusion about their diets?
OjhaShishir

(ii) How the answer to #6 is C and not B? The passage says "the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit". So, if micro-wear patterns of australopithecine teeth from regions other than east Africa are analyzed, those micro-wear patterns are likely to be very different from the patterns that Walker found (in East Africa), thereby calling into question Walker's conclusions.
Here's choice (C):

Quote:
(C) Orangutans are found to have a much broader diet than is currently recognized.
We keep (C) because it directly undermines Walker's logic, as stated in the passage. If orangutans were, in fact, NOT solely frugivorous, but in fact ate a much broader range of foods, then Walker's basis for comparing micro-wear in orangutans to micro-wear in East African australopithecines would be harder to accept.

And here's choice (B):

Quote:
(B) The micro-wear patterns of australopithecine teeth from regions other than east Africa are analyzed.
(B) doesn't tell us anything about what these new micro-wear patterns would show us. Maybe they'd be different from patterns from within east Africa. Maybe they'd be exactly the same. The choice alone doesn't gives us this information, so it doesn't call into question Walker's conclusion about what australopithecines ate.

OjhaShishir claims that "if micro-wear patterns of australopithecine teeth from regions other than east Africa are analyzed, those micro-wear patterns are likely to be very different from the patterns that Walker found (in East Africa)." And both of you refer to this statement, later in the passage:

    "In addition, the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit"

The portion quoted only pertains to current omnivorous primates, NOT the long-extinct australopithecines.

Here's where the author actually describes australopithecines:

    "if australopithecines were omnivores too, we might expect to find considerable population variation in their tooth micro-wear patterns."

This entire statement is speculation ("IF australopithecines WERE OMNIVORES, we MIGHT EXPECT..."). Even within that speculation, there is no information about variation based on geographic location.

(B) does not directly address the argument that we're trying to call into question, while (C) does. That's why we keep (C) and eliminate (B).

I hope this helps!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 1


gmatassassin88
GMATNinja
aalakshaya
Why is option b wrong in question 1?
See this previous explanation of question #1, and then let's talk specifically about option (B):

GMATNinja

Quote:
(Book Question: 95)
According to the passage, Walker and Szalay disagree on which of the following points?
A. The structure and composition of australopithecine teeth
B. The kinds of conclusions that can be drawn from the micro-wear patterns on australopithecine teeth
C. The idea that fruit was a part of the australopithecine diet
D. The extent to which seed cracking and bone crunching produce similar micro-wear patterns on teeth
E. The function of the heavy enamel on australopithecine teeth

The key to this question can be found in the following sentence: "He also disputes Szalay’s suggestion that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaptation to bone crunching, since both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics on teeth."

In other words, according to Walker, if those primates had in fact used their teeth for bone crunching, then the teeth should show distinctive micro-wear characteristics. We can infer that such micro-wear characteristics are NOT present on the teeth, so Walker disputes the theory that primates developed hard enamel as an adaptation to bone crunching.

Walker says that both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics, but he does NOT say that those characteristics are necessarily the same for both. Also, the passage tells us nothing about Szalay's opinion on the similarities between the patterns produced by seed cracking and those produced by bone crunching, so we have no idea whether the two agree or disagree. Thus, we can rule out (D)

Szalay apparently did not take the micro-wear evidence into account when developing his/her theory. Walker, on the other hand, does consider the micro-wear evidence and, as a result, disagrees with Szalay's theory regarding the function of the heavy enamel on the teeth.
(E) is the best answer.

Answer choice (B) states that Walker and Szalay disagree on "the kinds of conclusions that can be drawn from the micro-wear patterns on australopithecine teeth." We don't know whether or not this is true because the passage never reveals what Szalay thinks about micro-wear patterns. Szalay developed a theory for why australopithecone teeth had heavy enamel, but s/he never weighed in on the evidence of micro-wear patterns on those teeth. Answer (B) is out.

I hope that helps!

GMATNinja

passage says as per szalay heavy enamel is an adoption to bone chewing.How can we say she did not weighed in on the evidence of micro wear pattern.can't enamel be a part of micro wear pattern on the tooth.? i marked option B thinking study of heavy enamel is a part of study of wear pattern on tooth
We can say this in the context of the passage, because the passage never tells us what Szalay thinks about micro-wear characteristics on teeth.

In case the word choice is causing trouble here, let's clarify that enamel is NOT micro-wear, and "heavy enamel" is NOT a micro-wear pattern. Enamel is a protective substance that coats teeth.

So the only thing we do know, according to the passage, is that Szalay suggests that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaptation to bone crunching.

We also know that Walker disputes this suggestion. The citation of micro-wear characteristics is information that Walker, NOT Szalay, uses to support his conclusion that australopithecines were frugivores.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 3


EileenSit
Quote:
(Book Question: 97)
The passage suggests that which of the following would be true of studies of tooth micro-wear patterns conducted on modern baboons?
A. They would inaccurately suggest that some baboons eat more soft-bodied than hard-bodied insects.
B. They would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of some baboons’ diets.
C. They would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns among baboon populations.
D. They would inadequately reflect the extent to which some baboons consume certain types of insects.
E. They would indicate that baboons in certain regions eat only soft-bodied insects, whereas baboons in other regions eat hard-bodied insects.

We are told that " the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit." If modern baboons are omnivorous, then their diets would vary considerably from group to group depending on environment. Thus, the groups would have different micro-wear patterns. The passage doesn't tell us whether baboons are omnivorous, but it does not give us information to conclude whether the micro-wear patterns of different baboon populations would be similar or varying. (C) can be eliminated.

We are also told that, "insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects." In other words, even eating tons and tons of soft-bodied insects would not cause any abrasion or micro-wear patterns on the teeth of modern baboons. Thus, based on the micro-wear patterns alone, we would not know whether those baboons ate tons of soft-bodied insects or ate no insects at all. The micro-wear patterns would not adequately reflect the extent to which the baboons consumed soft-bodied insects, so choice (D) is the best answer.
And what kind of micro-wear has the entire passage been focused on? Micro-wear found on teeth.

Now, given that insect eating is an example of why micro-wear studies may have limited utility, we have all the context we need to understand that "abrasion" is used as an indicator of micro-wear on teeth.

>> I think I understands the statements of baboons. "insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects”. In here, the attribute clause: who eat only soft bodied insects, can be regarded as an explanation to why insect eating won't cause distinct micro patterns on baboon. Take a look at option C# They would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns among baboon populations.> If no distinct patterns can be found on baboon, there definitely won't be any significant difference on baboon's teeth pattern. It makes sense logically. Why is it wrong?
The quote you're highlighting only addresses micro-wear patterns that result from baboons eating insects (either soft-bodied or hard-bodied).

Choice (C) goes way beyond this focus on insect consumption. (C) says that micro-wear studies would reveal that there are NO significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns among baboon populations, as a whole.

There is simply no statement in the passage that suggests this. In fact, in the sentence immediately following the quote you've cited, here's what the author says about "current omnivorous primates" (which by definition would include modern baboons):

    "In addition, the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit..."

If the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably, then we have even less reason to believe choice (C), because we know that there could be considerable variation in diet among baboon populations.

I hope this helps clarify why we eliminate (C).
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 5


OjhaShishir
GMATNinja

We do know that those baboons eat only soft-bodied insects and not hard-bodied insects. Their teeth would NOT show micro-wear patterns that would result from eating hard-bodied insects. Thus, the LACK of such micro-wear patterns would be an "accurate indication of the absence of some kind of insects (hard-bodied insects) from the baboons' diet." (D) is the best answer.
Hi GMATNinja, but in addition, the passage also states that the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit.

So, micro-wear patterns of baboons from "one environment" may indicate absence of hard-bodied insects from the baboons' diet; but that may not necessarily be true from the analysis of micro-wear patterns of baboons from "another environment".
The passage states explicitly that modern baboons (described generally) eat ONLY soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.

This means that even if modern baboon teeth were sampled across different environments, we would not expect this specific dietary behavior to change. Perhaps there could be some other kind of variation in the diet of different modern baboon populations. But we have no reason to believe this variation would suddenly cancel the author's clear, categorical statement about the types of insects that modern baboons eat as a whole.

That's why choice (D) — which is narrowly focused on what the results would tell us about the absence of some kinds of insects from baboons' diet, would still be most likely to be true of the results obtained.
General Discussion
avatar
dsheth7
Joined: 27 Oct 2015
Last visit: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
8
 [2]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 6
Kudos: 8
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Can someone pls explain why answer to Q 104 is C?
Thanks
avatar
chibacca
Joined: 04 May 2016
Last visit: 17 Aug 2020
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Given Kudos: 48
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dsheth7
Hi Can someone pls explain why answer to Q 104 is C?
Thanks

Walker's theory is that "a" (australopithecine) were fruit eaters because they had "indistinguishable" tooth micro-wear characteristics from orangutans, who "are commonly assumed to be [fruit eaters]."

His theory would be called into question if this correlation was somehow inaccurate or not conclusive. Hence the word "assumed to be" because they are not entirely certain that this is accurate.

A) There's no mention of the heaviness or density of the tooth. Out of Scoop
B) It would be interesting to see if other areas had the same results. If they did, then it would support his claim but if they didn't, then it wouldn't. It's not definite enough to answer this question.
C) If orangutans were found to be eating other things besides fruits, such as seeds or insects, then Walker's theory of "a" being only fruit eaters would be incorrect. Correct
D) A varied environment could or could not change the theory so like B, it's not definite enough to weaken his claim.
E) Even if there were soft-bodied bugs, it does not mean they ate it or maybe it does. Again, like B and C, it can go both ways so it's incorrect.
avatar
KGump
Joined: 11 Jun 2016
Last visit: 16 Apr 2020
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
27
 [2]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
Posts: 55
Kudos: 27
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi @Gmatninja, Experts,

Could you please explain why option E is incorrect for Question 5 ( Book Q# 99)

Option E says: The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

If we can not infer anything concrete from the studies of tooth micro wear patterns, THEN, WHY is it incorrect to INFER that results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the austraXYZ diet can or cannot be drawn.

IS there ANY ASSUMPTION or LEAP which i have taken to think that OPtion E is correct ?

Thanks
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [19]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [19]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
(Book Question: 99)
It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?
A. There would be enough abrasion to allow a determination of whether baboons are frugivorous or insectivorous.
B. The results would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of the baboons’ diet.
C. The results would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns from one regional baboon population to another.
D. The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.
E. The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.
kunal1608
Hi GMATNinja, Experts,

Could you please explain why option E is incorrect for Question 5 ( Book Q# 99)

Option E says: The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

If we can not infer anything concrete from the studies of tooth micro wear patterns, THEN, WHY is it incorrect to INFER that results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the austraXYZ diet can or cannot be drawn.

IS there ANY ASSUMPTION or LEAP which i have taken to think that OPtion E is correct ?

Thanks
Modern baboons eat insects (only soft-bodied). But if we study micro-wear patterns on their teeth, we would NOT find evidence that they eat insects (micro-wear studies would only provide evidence of eating insects if the baboons ate HARD-bodied insects). So, from a micro-wear study, we CANNOT conclude whether an animal eats insects.

Thus, the baboon micro-wear study would LIKELY provide evidence that information about insect consumption cannot be determined from micro-wear studies. In other words, the study would LIKELY provide an indication that you CANNOT draw insect-consumption inferences from micro-wear studies.

If choice (E) said "likely" instead of "unlikely", it would be correct. But, as is, (E) is incorrect (tricky!).

(D) is the best answer.
avatar
KGump
Joined: 11 Jun 2016
Last visit: 16 Apr 2020
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
27
 [2]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
Posts: 55
Kudos: 27
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Quote:
(Book Question: 99)
It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?
A. There would be enough abrasion to allow a determination of whether baboons are frugivorous or insectivorous.
B. The results would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of the baboons’ diet.
C. The results would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns from one regional baboon population to another.
D. The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.
E. The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.
kunal1608
Hi GMATNinja, Experts,

Could you please explain why option E is incorrect for Question 5 ( Book Q# 99)

Option E says: The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

If we can not infer anything concrete from the studies of tooth micro wear patterns, THEN, WHY is it incorrect to INFER that results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the austraXYZ diet can or cannot be drawn.

IS there ANY ASSUMPTION or LEAP which i have taken to think that OPtion E is correct ?

Thanks
Modern baboons eat insects (only soft-bodied). But if we study micro-wear patterns on their teeth, we would NOT find evidence that they eat insects (micro-wear studies would only provide evidence of eating insects if the baboons ate HARD-bodied insects). So, from a micro-wear study, we CANNOT conclude whether an animal eats insects.

Thus, the baboon micro-wear study would LIKELY provide evidence that information about insect consumption cannot be determined from micro-wear studies. In other words, the study would LIKELY provide an indication that you CANNOT draw insect-consumption inferences from micro-wear studies.

If choice (E) said "likely" instead of "unlikely", it would be correct. But, as is, (E) is incorrect (tricky!).

(D) is the best answer.

Thanks a lot for the explanation

Its still quite hard to understand :( , Could you please help me break down Statement E further .

I understand this part :"we CANNOT conclude whether an animal eats insects."

Is What you mean to say that if option E was drafted as : "The results would be likely to provide SOME indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies" . THEN It would be correct ?

Please Explain !

Thanks
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 418
Own Kudos:
94
 [2]
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 418
Kudos: 94
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
2. The passage suggests that Walker’s research indicated which of the following about australopithecine teeth?

(A) They had micro-wear characteristics indicating that fruit constituted only a small part of their diet.
(B) They lacked micro-wear characteristics associated with seed eating and bone crunching.
(C) They had micro-wear characteristics that differed in certain ways from the micro-wear patterns of chimpanzees and orangutans.
(D) They had micro-wear characteristics suggesting that the diet of australopithecines varied from one region to another.
(E) They lacked the micro-wear characteristics distinctive of modern frugivores.

Hi mikemcgarry, GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja, MagooshExpert Carolyn,
sayantanc2
VeritasPrepKarishma

I am curious about E,
Does "lack distinctive" mean indistinctive or similar?
That's why i picked up E,

Please clarify.

Thanks in advance
Have a lovely day.
>_~
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [5]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KGump

Quote:
(Book Question: 99)
It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?
A. There would be enough abrasion to allow a determination of whether baboons are frugivorous or insectivorous.
B. The results would suggest that insects constitute the largest part of the baboons’ diet.
C. The results would reveal that there are no significant differences in tooth micro-wear patterns from one regional baboon population to another.
D. The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.
E. The results would be unlikely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.
GMATNinja
Modern baboons eat insects (only soft-bodied). But if we study micro-wear patterns on their teeth, we would NOT find evidence that they eat insects (micro-wear studies would only provide evidence of eating insects if the baboons ate HARD-bodied insects). So, from a micro-wear study, we CANNOT conclude whether an animal eats insects.

Thus, the baboon micro-wear study would LIKELY provide evidence that information about insect consumption cannot be determined from micro-wear studies. In other words, the study would LIKELY provide an indication that you CANNOT draw insect-consumption inferences from micro-wear studies.

If choice (E) said "likely" instead of "unlikely", it would be correct. But, as is, (E) is incorrect (tricky!).

(D) is the best answer.
Thanks a lot for the explanation

Its still quite hard to understand :( , Could you please help me break down Statement E further .

I understand this part :"we CANNOT conclude whether an animal eats insects."

Is What you mean to say that if option E was drafted as : "The results would be likely to provide SOME indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies" . THEN It would be correct ?

Please Explain !

Thanks
You're on the right track, and we don't need to change the wording that much. The following change would be sufficient to make (E) an attractive choice:

    The results would be likely to provide any indication of what inferences about the australopithecine diet can or cannot be drawn from micro-wear studies.

As it stands, (E) claims that a baboon micro-wear study is unlikely to identify anything that can be inferred or cannot be inferred about australopithecine diet. This is incorrect because we know that modern baboons' consumption of (soft-bodied) insects cannot be inferred from a micro-wear study.

Therefore, a modern baboon micro-wear study on baboons actually is likely to identify anything (at least one thing) that cannot be inferred from a micro-wear study: whether or not australopithecines ate insects.

And yeah, it's a painfully constructed answer choice. :)

zoezhuyan

Quote:
2. The passage suggests that Walker’s research indicated which of the following about australopithecine teeth?

(A) They had micro-wear characteristics indicating that fruit constituted only a small part of their diet.
(B) They lacked micro-wear characteristics associated with seed eating and bone crunching.
(C) They had micro-wear characteristics that differed in certain ways from the micro-wear patterns of chimpanzees and orangutans.
(D) They had micro-wear characteristics suggesting that the diet of australopithecines varied from one region to another.
(E) They lacked the micro-wear characteristics distinctive of modern frugivores.
I am curious about E,
Does "lack distinctive" mean indistinctive or similar?
That's why i picked up E,

Please clarify.
"Distinctive of" is the same as "characteristic of" or "belonging to." (E) says that australopithecine teeth lacked the micro-wear characteristics characteristic of modern frugivores. In other words, australopithecine teeth didn't have the same micro-wear characteristics that the modern frugivore teeth have.

Walker said no such thing. In fact, Walker concluded that australopithecines were frugivores because he had observed that the tooth micro-wear characteristics of east African australopithecine specimens are indistinguishable from those of the primates that are commonly assumed to be frugivores. That's why we eliminate (E).
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,231
Own Kudos:
5,890
 [4]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,231
Kudos: 5,890
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
P1 - a theory; disputed 2 claims; evidence given.
P2 - evidence that theory may not be correct.
Main point - a theory is given but disputed later one with evidence.

1. According to the passage, Walker and Szalay disagree on which of the following points?
p1- He also disputes Szalay’s suggestion that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaptation to bone crunching,
(E) The function of the heavy enamel on australopithecine teeth

-------------------------------------------
2. The passage suggests that Walker’s research indicated which of the following about australopithecine teeth?
p1
(B) They lacked micro-wear characteristics associated with seed eating and bone crunching. - no doubt about it.

-------------------------------------------
3. The passage suggests that which of the following would be true of studies of tooth micro-wear patterns conducted on modern baboons?
p2 - would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.

(D) They would inadequately reflect the extent to which some baboons consume certain types of insects. -
------------------------------------------
4. The passage suggests which of the following about the micro-wear patterns found on the teeth of omnivorous primates?

the diets of current omnivorous primates vary considerably depending on the environments that different groups within a primate species inhabit; if australopithecines were omnivores too, we might expect to find considerable population variation in their tooth micro-wear patterns.

(E) The patterns may differ among groups within a species depending on the environment within which a particular group lives.

-------------------------------------------

5. It can be inferred from the passage that if studies of tooth micro-wear patterns were conducted on modern baboons, which of the following would most likely be true of the results obtained?

p2 - For example, insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.
(D) The results would provide an accurate indication of the absence of some kinds of insects from the baboons’ diet.

-------------------------------------------

6. It can be inferred from the passage that Walker’s conclusion about the australopithecine diet would be called into question under which of the following circumstances?
P1 - His conclusion that australopithecines were frugivores (fruit eaters) is based upon his observation that the tooth micro-wear characteristics of east African australopithecine specimens are indistinguishable from those of chimpanzees and orangutans, which are commonly assumed to be frugivorous primates.

(C) Orangutans are found to have a much broader diet than is currently recognized. - if so, walker for sure wrong as both tooth tear are same then diet should also be same.

--------------------------------------------

7. The author of the passage mentions the diets of baboons and other living primates most likely in order to
p2 - mainly to describe the limitations of study in question.

(D) illustrate some of the limitations of using tooth micro-wear patterns to draw definitive conclusions about a group’s diet
User avatar
willacethis
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 137
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44 (Online)
GPA: 3.98
Products:
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44 (Online)
Posts: 95
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why is option b wrong in question 1?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aalakshaya
Why is option b wrong in question 1?
See this previous explanation of question #1, and then let's talk specifically about option (B):

GMATNinja

Quote:
(Book Question: 95)
According to the passage, Walker and Szalay disagree on which of the following points?
A. The structure and composition of australopithecine teeth
B. The kinds of conclusions that can be drawn from the micro-wear patterns on australopithecine teeth
C. The idea that fruit was a part of the australopithecine diet
D. The extent to which seed cracking and bone crunching produce similar micro-wear patterns on teeth
E. The function of the heavy enamel on australopithecine teeth

The key to this question can be found in the following sentence: "He also disputes Szalay’s suggestion that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaptation to bone crunching, since both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics on teeth."

In other words, according to Walker, if those primates had in fact used their teeth for bone crunching, then the teeth should show distinctive micro-wear characteristics. We can infer that such micro-wear characteristics are NOT present on the teeth, so Walker disputes the theory that primates developed hard enamel as an adaptation to bone crunching.

Walker says that both seed cracking and bone crunching produce distinctive micro-wear characteristics, but he does NOT say that those characteristics are necessarily the same for both. Also, the passage tells us nothing about Szalay's opinion on the similarities between the patterns produced by seed cracking and those produced by bone crunching, so we have no idea whether the two agree or disagree. Thus, we can rule out (D)

Szalay apparently did not take the micro-wear evidence into account when developing his/her theory. Walker, on the other hand, does consider the micro-wear evidence and, as a result, disagrees with Szalay's theory regarding the function of the heavy enamel on the teeth.
(E) is the best answer.

Answer choice (B) states that Walker and Szalay disagree on "the kinds of conclusions that can be drawn from the micro-wear patterns on australopithecine teeth." We don't know whether or not this is true because the passage never reveals what Szalay thinks about micro-wear patterns. Szalay developed a theory for why australopithecone teeth had heavy enamel, but s/he never weighed in on the evidence of micro-wear patterns on those teeth. Answer (B) is out.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
yunbao
Joined: 24 Mar 2019
Last visit: 09 Jun 2019
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 20
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For question 6/100, It can be inferred from the passage that Walker’s conclusion about the australopithecine diet would be called into question under which of the following circumstances? Why the option E) is wrong?

My thought is that, soft-bodied insects are not leaving any micro-wear pattern. So if there were a lot of such insects around, there was no way to tell whether australopithecine ate those insects or not. It can be they eat fruit like orangutans as well as soft-bodied insects.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [9]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [9]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yunbao
For question 6/100, It can be inferred from the passage that Walker’s conclusion about the australopithecine diet would be called into question under which of the following circumstances? Why the option E) is wrong?

My thought is that, soft-bodied insects are not leaving any micro-wear pattern. So if there were a lot of such insects around, there was no way to tell whether australopithecine ate those insects or not. It can be they eat fruit like orangutans as well as soft-bodied insects.
Quote:
6. It can be inferred from the passage that Walker’s conclusion about the australopithecine diet would be called into question under which of the following circumstances?

(A) The tooth enamel of australopithecines is found to be much heavier than that of modern frugivorous primates.
(B) The micro-wear patterns of australopithecine teeth from regions other than east Africa are analyzed.
(C) Orangutans are found to have a much broader diet than is currently recognized.
(D) The environment of east Africa at the time australopithecines lived there is found to have been far more varied than is currently thought.
(E) The area in which the australopithecine specimens were found is discovered to have been very rich in soft-bodied insects during the period when australopithecines lived there.
First, let's discuss option (C). The passage specifically tells us that "[Walker's] conclusion that australopithecines were frugivores (fruit eaters) is based upon his observation that the tooth micro-wear characteristics of east African australopithecine specimens are indistinguishable from those of chimpanzees and orangutans, which are commonly assumed to be frugivorous primates."

Phew, that's a mouthful, but it breaks down Walker's logic:

  • East African australopithecine teeth have the same micro-wear patterns as chimp/orangutan teeth.
  • Chimps/orangutans are fruit eaters.
  • Therefore, australopithecines were also fruit eaters.

Choice (C) directly contradicts the second bullet. If orangutans ate much more than just fruit, then Walker's logic completely falls apart--the fact that australopithecine and orangutan teeth have similar patterns would NOT suggest that the australopithecines were fruit eaters. That makes (C) a solid answer.

Choice (E), on the other hand, while tempting, does not affect Walker's logic. Sure, there may have been a ton of soft-bodied insects around. There may have also been an abundance of seeds, wheat, small rodents, pizza trees (if only that were a real thing!), sushi bushes, etc., but that doesn't mean that the australopithecines actually ATE those things. Sure, if soft-bodied insects were NOT around, we would have solid evidence that the australopithecines did NOT eat them. However, the presence of soft-bodied insects, without any other evidence, does not call Walker's conclusion into question.

I hope that helps!
 1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts