Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Ready to ace the GMAT and unlock your dream MBA program? Look no further! In this comprehensive video, we cover everything you need to know – from mindset shifts to powerful strategies and a step-by-step monthly plan.
We know Strengthen and Weaken questions account for more than 50% of the CR questions on the GMAT. With CR becoming even more important on GMAT Focus, it's time you strengthen your weaknesses with an approach that improves your solving time and accuracy!
With brand new features like:AI-driven Planner tool, 850+ data Insights practice questions and GMAT Focus Edition Adaptive mock tests with ESR+ analysis and personal mentor support, our course is the most comprehensive course for GMAT Focus Edition.
Join us for an exclusive live interview with Piyush, who achieved an impressive GMAT FE 735, securing the coveted 100th percentile! Gain invaluable insights and actionable tips to elevate your own GMAT performance. Don’t miss out!
Earning a 100th percentile score on the GMAT Focus is no easy feat. But with Target Test Prep, any score is possible. Take Ming, a TTP student who recently scored 755 (Q86/V88/DI86) on the GMAT Focus Edition.
Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles
[#permalink]
19 Jan 2005, 19:56
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct
100%
(00:27)
wrong
based on 6
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Environmentalist:
The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville creates unacceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.
Milville business spokesperson:
Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.
Environmentalist:
I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.
Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?
A. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances
B. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
C. Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree by a different means
D. Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalistÂ
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles
[#permalink]
20 Jan 2005, 19:49
E) or B
E
financial benefit of many local residents is expected. Environmentalist is arguing that financial benifit did not happen as the cross-country skiers don't come any more.
Re: Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles
[#permalink]
22 Jan 2005, 01:18
The businessman says snowmobile benefit the economy since it brings tourist. The enviornmentalist says snowmobile results in pollution thus deters tourist. So something (snowmobile) thought to be benefitable is actually not benefitable.
Re: Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles
[#permalink]
27 Jan 2005, 22:03
I can't believe OA is (B).
B. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
It is the envioronmentalists' position that certain desirable outcome (torism boom economy) is outweighed by negative aspective aspects associated with producing that outcome (pollution is associated with snowmobile production). They are not challenging this assumption.
Re: Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles
[#permalink]
28 Jan 2005, 07:44
honghu, at first i was tempted to pick a, too, but then decided on b, based on experience from similar problems. there is a certain "gmat logic" that SOMETIMES seems to contradict "standard logic".
Re: Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles
[#permalink]
28 Jan 2005, 16:02
What?! That cannot be true! :eek: Now why would there be a GMAT logic that is different from the standard logic? They should be ashamed of themselves. :shame:
Re: Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles
[#permalink]
08 Oct 2010, 16:10
Just did the test today and got angry with this one. Anyone notice "financial benefit" in the stem?
I was thinking the cross country skiers were ones who ski long distance who do not necessarily use the park and pay fees .... bla bla... and not like the alpine ones who ski downhill in the park... bla bla.
Re: Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles
[#permalink]
04 Dec 2013, 10:23
Answer should be choice A.
The environmentalist did not say (challenge) the statement, "economic benefits outweigh the negative impact of snowboarding, which is pollution".
He/she was thinking like, "yeah, the spokesperson is probably right that economic benefit is more preferable. So, let me do one thing. I will tell him about the fact that they are loosing out on the huge number of cross country skiers who could ALSO bring economic benefit."
So,
A. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances
makes sense anyone? :-D
pb_india wrote:
Environmentalist:
The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville creates unacceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.
Milville business spokesperson:
Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.
Environmentalist:
I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.
Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?
A. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances
B. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
C. Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree by a different means
D. Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalistÂ
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles [#permalink]