MikeMBA
When they were asked on the employment issue, they said they have full employment after 6 months. They blamed it on hiring times of some local firms who hire later in the year. I guess not enough students are complaining about it to get the changes needed. That's what I'm thinking, the same dean is still there.
According to their website they only had 1648 applicants which is why they only have 5 people but that seems low. I assume the faculty participates in the admissions as well as the dean??
Are there any school reps here on this forum that could answer anything??
Hey all, I'm also a first year at Marshall in the full time MBA program. I completely echo what some of my classmates have said about the program. It's a great program that really does have exceptional people, etc. etc.
I wanted to address the employment rate issue quickly. While it's absolutely true that the career office is catching up and filling staffing and coming out of a dark spot, the numbers are misleading. In my opinion (and the reasons I chose Marshall), Marshall's strengths are two fold - 1) The diversity and impressiveness of the student body, and 2) the "Trojan Network".
(Note: as I'm writing this, I realize it may sound like propaganda, but I assure you I'm being 100% genuine)
The Trojan Network is VERY real and is one of the most amazing forces I've ever seen. You don't truly grasp how much alumni and fellow classmates help each other until you dive in. I've had one-on-one's with EXTREMELY impressive executives (3 CEOs of Fortune 500s to date...and I've only been in school 2 months) simply by reaching out and telling them I'm a Marshall student. Everyone does everything they can to help each other out, and that's surprisingly rare in the MBA community.
And the diversity in the student body comes in the form of accomplished and ambitious people from very different backgrounds who want to go into very different industries. Many other schools are very monotonous (80% of the class comes from banking or 75% want to go into consulting). For example, USC is the top placing program for such industries as Entertainment and Real Estate (we're in LA...kinda obvious). These are two industries that do "just-in-time" hiring, which means they don't know when their positions will be open until May (which is graduation). Students don't have a hard time landing these positions when they open up, but it's not as formulaic as finance or consulting where they know a year in advance that there will be xx amount of spots open so they can offer positions the summer prior to graduating.
This obviously brings down the "employment at graduation" figures, but it's not a real lack of employment (if that makes sense?).
Furthermore, we've formed a close bond with our Viterbi school of Engineering and have a lot of entrepreneurial students that graduate and start their own businesses. As such, some of these students don't get counted in the employment stats. Stanford had a similar problem a few years ago.
I'm not trying to make everything at Marshall sound perfect, just wanted to provide some color. Happy to answer any questions or connect if anyone has any concerns. Thanks!