bakfed wrote:
I see a couple of big disadvantages presenting your case.
Your age will most likely come back as a disadvantage to a regular full-time MBA admissions. For your age and your experience, you'll better off looking at EMBAs. However, EMBAs are really for those who want to stay in their original field. So for this matter, really consider what it is that you want to do and who you want to work for.
Another big factor against you is your existing MBA degree. Most schools have a policy against applicants with an MBA already. I'm not sure what schools accept students with an MBA, but it'll do you best if you start researching for school and see which ones do not accepts those with an MBA. For example, since you mentioned Kellogg, go to Northwestern's Kellogg site and see what its MBA criteria is. I believe Dartmouth Tuck states directly that it will not consider students with an MBA already (correct me if I'm wrong).
Once you have your list of schools, you can then really determine which way it is you wan to go, i.e. MBA or EMBA. Again, if you're keen on switching gear and head into another industry, definitely try for the MBA. You just have to really make your case clear and convincing for the AdComs to believe that another MBA will only do you good.
Bakfed,
Please correct me if Iam wrong. From what I have read and heard ,European schools encourage/prefer students with more years of experience. Wouldn't the OP have an advantage if he went to a business school (say INSEAD) with his level of experience to take help him get into senior level management?A Big name MBA school will help one to develop the network/connections which would be difficult to develop otherwise.
Also I have another question. Is the executive MBA at INSEAD considered more prestigious than the Full time MBA? Iam asking these questions because Iam in the same boat . Thanks.