Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 21:37 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 21:37

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 218
Own Kudos [?]: 862 [120]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4348
Own Kudos [?]: 30797 [28]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 300
Own Kudos [?]: 395 [13]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7627 [1]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Top Contributor
DLMD wrote:
Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used satellite images to tally deforested areas, where farmers and ranchers have clear-cut and burned all the trees, but such work has not addressed either logging, which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning down individual trees but do not denude the forest.

A. which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning
B. which removes only selected trees, or surface fires that burn
C. which removes only selected trees, along with surface fires that burn
D. removing only selected trees, or surface fires, burning
E. removing only selected trees, as well as surface fires that burn


The question tests the concepts of Modifiers and Parallelism.
The modifier in the underlined part “which is the removal of only selected trees,” describes the gerund ‘logging’.
There is also parallelism of correlative conjunctions. The conjunction ‘either’ is present just before the underlined portion. The idiomatic (fixed) pair of conjunctions is either-or.

Options A, C, and E can be eliminated on the basis of parallelism of correlative conjunctions. Options A and E have the conjunction ‘as well as’. Option C has the conjunction ‘along with’. Neither of these conjunctions can follow the conjunction ‘either’. So, these three options can be ruled out.

Option D has a structure that is not graceful. The modifier "removing only selected trees" is also not appropriate in this sentence as a participle modifier immediately after the gerund 'logging' is not a graceful construction.

D also has another parallelism error.
“either logging, which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning down individual trees but do not denude the forest.”
“burning down individual trees but do not denude the forest” is a modifier that describes “surface fires” just as “which is the removal of only selected trees” is a modifier that describes “logging”. Since the verbs ‘burn’ and ‘denude’ are part of the same modifier and convey two actions that surface fires do, the two verbs must be in the same form. In Option D, ‘burning’ is in the participle form and denude is in the verb form.
So, Option D can also be eliminated.

The parallelism is maintained in Option B.
“which removes only selected trees, or surface fires that burn down individual trees but do not denude the forest.
Therefore, Option B is the most appropriate option.

Jayanthi Kumar.
General Discussion
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 320
Own Kudos [?]: 145 [2]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
2
Kudos
A, C and E are wrong because the correct idiom is Either X or Y. Between B and D, B is better. In B "Which" modifies logging better than does "removing" in D. B should be the answer.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2011
Status:Appearing for GMAT
Posts: 70
Own Kudos [?]: 837 [3]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: United States (NJ)
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
marcodonzelli wrote:
Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used satellite images to tally deforested areas, where farmers and ranchers have clear-cut and burned all the trees, but such work has not addressed either logging, which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning down individual trees but do not denude the forest.

A. which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning
B. which removes only selected trees, or surface fires that burn
C. which removes only selected trees, along with surface fires that burn
D. removing only selected trees, or surface fires, burning
E. removing only selected trees, as well as surface fires that burn



Hi All,

First of all let's find out that we can eliminate D and E straight away. Why ?

If "V1ing - removing" modifier comes after COMMA, it can play one of two roles.
1. It may modify the whole previous clause. "Rosy started the engine, using the power button"
2. It may show results of previous clause. "Crime has recently decreased in our neighborhood, leading to a rise in properties values."

Here if "removing only selected trees" is modifying previous clause "but such work has not addressed either logging" than it changed the whole meaning of sentence. ""removing only selected trees" also can not show result of previous clause so D and E are wrong.

"which removes only selected trees" is concise than "which is the removal of only selected trees". Why ? because verb "removes" is better than noun "removal". The order of VAN that Verb>Adjective or Adverb>Noun, which eliminate A.

Between B and C, C has error for idiom . "Either X or Y. so answer is B.


I hope my explanation helped. If indeed, please give me kudos.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 129
Own Kudos [?]: 232 [2]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE:Web Development (Insurance)
Send PM
Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
2
Kudos
I have a huge problem with B

logging, which removes....


How can this be correct???

logging doesn't remove... logging is the removal of trees... it's similar to saying: baking, which creates cakes or farming, which grows crops.

Any advice sayantanc2k and daagh?
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [3]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
arirux92 wrote:
I have a huge problem with B

logging, which removes....


How can this be correct???

logging doesn't remove... logging is the removal of trees... it's similar to saying: baking, which creates cakes or farming, which grows crops.

Any advice sayantanc2k and daagh?


I do not see a problem if the name of a process is the subject of an action verb that indicates the result or the outcome of the process.

According to me, the sentences "Baking creates cake." is OK, so is "Logging removes trees."

However it is awkward when the name of the process is the subject of the action verb of the process itself. The actual action taken during the process of "logging" is "cutting" trees. Thus "Logging cuts trees." is awkward.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2017
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
How to differentiate between D and B
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [4]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Prachi1002 wrote:
How to differentiate between D and B


Comma + present participle acts as a verb modifier, not a noun modifier. Therefore ", removing...." refers to "has not addressed", not "logging". Also ",burning..." refers to the same verb and not "surface fires".

Steffi defeated Sabatini, winning the Wimbledon.... here ",winning..." does not refer to "Sabatini" - it refers to "defeated".
Director
Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 3379 [6]
Given Kudos: 877
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
6
Kudos
Correct idiom: either X or Y.
A and E: either logging...AS WELL AS surface fires
C: either logging...ALONG WITH surface fires
Eliminate A, C and E.

A conjunction such as but must serve to connect PARALLEL FORMS:
NOUN but NOUN
VERB but VERB
MODIFIER but MODIFIER.

D: surface fires, burning down invidivual trees but do not denude
Here, but incorrectly serves to connect burning (modifier) to do not denude (verb).
Eliminate D.

The correct answer is B.
B: either logging, which removes only selected trees, or surface fires that burn down individual trees
Here, the portions in red both serve as MODIFIERS.
The first modifier refers to logging, while the second modifier refers to surface fires.
Since they have different referents, the two modifiers do not have to be structured the same way.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used satellite images to tally deforested areas, where farmers and ranchers have clear-cut and burned all the trees, but such work has not addressed either logging, which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning down individual trees but do not denude the forest.

Since 'either' has been used in the non-underlined part, we are forced to bring a matching 'or' for idiom's sake. Only B and D qualify


A. which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning-- either and as well as is wrong

B., which removes, only selected trees or surface fires that burn --correct choice.

C., which removes only selected trees, along with surface fires that burn .... either along with, is wrong

D. removing only selected trees, or surface fires, burning --- burning wrongly modifies such works that include logging and burning.

E. removing only selected trees, as well as surface fires that burn--- either as well as is wrong.

B is the correct choice
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2019
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 2.7
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
Confused about the role that is playing ?...1) Is it an subordinating conjunction then why comma is not used.
2) Or As a pronoun. But is comma the basis of conclusion.
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [0]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Tushrgupta wrote:
Confused about the role that is playing ?...1) Is it an subordinating conjunction then why comma is not used.
2) Or As a pronoun. But is comma the basis of conclusion.

Not sure I understand your question. In "...surface fires that burn....", that is being used as a relative pronoun.

Some people like to differentiate "relative pronouns" (which, that, who, whom etc.) from "subordinating conjunctions" (because, although, until etc.); others like to club "relative pronouns" in the broader category of "subordinating conjunctions".

Frankly both approaches work, as long as you understand that both subordinating conjunctions and relative pronouns, mark the start of a dependent clause.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Apr 2019
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
I understand - why B is the correct option. But I want to know is there no condition for either X or Y in which X and Y also needs to follow parallelism?
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [0]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
Expert Reply
priyaarorastep wrote:
I understand - why B is the correct option. But I want to know is there no condition for either X or Y in which X and Y also needs to follow parallelism?

Hi Priya, X and Y definitely must be parallel, in either X or Y structure.

In fact, that is happening in the correct option B:

....such work has not addressed either logging...or surface fires....

Both logging and surface fires are nouns/noun-phrases and are hence parallel.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Sep 2022
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 43
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V37
Send PM
Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
egmat

In Option B, can we say that there is an issue in parallelism?

The 1st part is modified by an non essential modifying clause "which ......" while the second part is modified by an essential modifier "that ....."
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4348
Own Kudos [?]: 30797 [1]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
toyesh30 wrote:
egmat

In Option B, can we say that there is an issue in parallelism?

The 1st part is modified by an non essential modifying clause "which ......" while the second part is modified by an essential modifier "that ....."


Hey toyesh30

Thank you for your query.

The quick answer to your question is: No, this is not a parallelism error.

Let's understand why:

B: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used satellite images to tally deforested areas, where farmers and ranchers have clear-cut and burned all the trees, but such work has not addressed either logging, which removes only selected trees, or surface fires that burn down individual trees but do not denude the forest.

Sentence Structure:
    Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest

      have used satellite images to tally deforested areas,

        where farmers and ranchers have clear-cut and burned all the trees,
    but such work has not addressed

      either logging,

        which removes only selected trees,

      or surface fires that burn down individual trees but do not denude the forest.

Important Points to note:

    1. The two parallel nouns, by virtue of the correlative "either...or", are: "logging" and "surface fires that burn down individual trees but do not denude the forest". This is a classic example of parallelism in an imperfect list. The reason that "logging" is not followed by an essential modifier is that there is only one kind of "logging". "Surface fires", on the other hand, can be of various types depending on the kind of damage they do. Hence, the logical meaning conveyed by the sentence requires us to take these two nouns as parallel. What's important to note is that at the end of the day, "logging" and "surface fires that burn down individual trees but do not denude the forest" are indeed nouns. So, we are maintaining both grammatical parallelism and logical consistency.

    2. Just because one of the nouns in a list is modified by a non-essential modifier, it is not necessary that every noun in that list be modified by a non-essential modifier. Here's another official question to practice this: https://gmatclub.com/forum/as-envisione ... ml#p318336


To conclude, there is a degree of flexibility that comes with Parallelism. As long as the core principles are maintained, the sentence will be fine. Always remember though, parallelism of "MEANING" trumps that of grammar. "Meaning" comes first.


I hope this answers your question and improves your understanding.

Happy Learning!

Abhishek
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
toyesh30 wrote:
egmat

In Option B, can we say that there is an issue in parallelism?

The 1st part is modified by an non essential modifying clause "which ......" while the second part is modified by an essential modifier "that ....."


Hello toyesh30,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, there is no parallelism error in Option B.

The nature of modifiers acting upon parallel elements does not affect whether the elements are parallel.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17223
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne