Last visit was: 05 May 2024, 06:08 It is currently 05 May 2024, 06:08

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [7]
Given Kudos: 9
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2016
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 26 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5431 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Apr 2014
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 195 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Pronoun:Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory [#permalink]
anurag7mukharya wrote:
Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory has more to do with the persuasive skills of its expositors than with its accuracy in predicting economic
events, Professor McCloskey examines the rhetorical practices of economists.

○○ its expositors than with its
○○ these expositors than its
○○ its expositors compared to its
○○ the theory’s expositors than their
○○ its expositors than with their



IMO : A

This is an eclipse concept problem. " To Do" is self understood after THAN in opt A.

Also, Opt D and E are wrong because of change in meaning. Their refers to expositors (wrong)

More X than Y, thus C is wrong

Btw A and B

B) "these" use is redundant and incorrect .

A is correct .
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 171 [1]
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Send PM
Re: Pronoun:Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory [#permalink]
1
Kudos
anurag7mukharya wrote:
Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory has more to do with the persuasive skills of its expositors than with its accuracy in predicting economic
events, Professor McCloskey examines the rhetorical practices of economists.

○○ its expositors than with its
○○ these expositors than its
○○ its expositors compared to its
○○ the theory’s expositors than their
○○ its expositors than with their


We want to say that Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory has more to do with the persuasive skills of theory's expositors than with theory's accuracy in predicting economic
events, Professor McCloskey examines the rhetorical practices of economists.

Also more (to do with) persuasive... than (with) accuracy...
So A
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2016
Posts: 194
Own Kudos [?]: 769 [0]
Given Kudos: 418
Concentration: Operations, Leadership
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
Send PM
Re: Pronoun:Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory [#permalink]
The sentence is correct as written. Here the pronoun “its” clearly refers to “theory,” so the use is correct. Eliminate (D) and (E), which use “their.” Also, (A) is the only choice that maintains correct parallel structure in the two-part construction “more to do with . . . than with . . .” Thus, choice (A) is the correct answer. Eliminate (B) and (C) because they violate the parallel structure.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2017
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 58 [0]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 3.1
Send PM
Re: Pronoun:Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory [#permalink]
I went with A for the following reasons:

1) I believed the subject, "economic theory", to be singular... so needed the singular pronoun "its"
2) A .. keeps the same parallelism of .. "more....with the persuasive skills" .."than with its"""
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Apr 2020
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 29 [1]
Given Kudos: 185
Location: India
GPA: 3.3
Send PM
Pronoun:Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory [#permalink]
1
Kudos
anurag7mukharya wrote:
Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory has more to do with the persuasive skills of its expositors than with its accuracy in predicting economic events, Professor McCloskey examines the rhetorical practices of economists.

○○ its expositors than with its
○○ these expositors than its
○○ its expositors compared to its
○○ the theory’s expositors than their
○○ its expositors than with their

Breakdown in simpler terms:

Say
Economic Theory = X
Skills = Y
Accuracy in predicting Economic Events = Z

Re-phrasing the question:
Arguing that dominance of X has more to do with Y than with Z, Professor McCloskey examines the rhetorical practices of economists.

The parallelism on 'with' is hard to spot but holds the key.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.”

Saurav
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 77
Location: China
Send PM
Re: Pronoun:Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory [#permalink]
more...than rather than more...compare to
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2016
Posts: 209
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Send PM
Pronoun:Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory [#permalink]
Although option A is correct as we presume that "accuracy in predicting economic" belongs to theory. But if we assume that "accuracy in predicting economic" belongs to "expositors" then option E also makes sense. Isn't it ?

A ○○ its expositors than with its
E ○○ its expositors than with their

Originally posted by abhishekmayank on 19 Nov 2021, 04:21.
Last edited by abhishekmayank on 19 Nov 2021, 10:36, edited 1 time in total.
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5124
Own Kudos [?]: 4684 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Pronoun:Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory [#permalink]
Expert Reply
abhishekmayank wrote:
Although option A is correct as presume that "accuracy in predicting economic" belongs to theory. But if assume that "accuracy in predicting economic" belongs to "expositors" then option E also makes sense. Isn't it ?

A ○○ its expositors than with its
E ○○ its expositors than with their


Hello abhishekmayank,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can help resolve your doubt.

Yes, if we were to assume that the sentence refers to the accuracy of the "expositors", then Option E would be correct. However, we cannot do so, as the meaning conveyed by the original sentence is that the accuracy is of the "theories". Remember, the intended meaning of the sentence is typically assumed to be the meaning conveyed by Option A; it is only when Option A produces an entirely illogical or incoherent meaning that we consider any other meaning.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Pronoun:Arguing that the dominance of an economic theory [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6922 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne