Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 02:45 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 02:45

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2016
Posts: 167
Own Kudos [?]: 59 [7]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V28
GPA: 4
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 263
Own Kudos [?]: 328 [3]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5426 [2]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2016
Posts: 167
Own Kudos [?]: 59 [0]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V28
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Not until 1932, nearly a century and a half after the first senatorial [#permalink]
paidlukkha wrote:
entry point
elected to be vs elect as
also Not x but/as y
untill 1932....was B & C remains

elect someone (as) something
to select someone to be something by ballot.
We elected her as our representative. She was elected as our president.

elect someone to something
to select someone to be a member of something by ballot; to select someone to be an officer in something by ballot.
We elected you to office, so do your job. Tom was elected to the congress.

per the meaning we need elect as - only in B




Why cant "had" be used here..
I mean there are 2 time periods compared..so present perfect tense could be used...
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Not until 1932, nearly a century and a half after the first senatorial [#permalink]
Expert Reply
suramya26 wrote:
paidlukkha wrote:
entry point
elected to be vs elect as
also Not x but/as y
untill 1932....was B & C remains

elect someone (as) something
to select someone to be something by ballot.
We elected her as our representative. She was elected as our president.

elect someone to something
to select someone to be a member of something by ballot; to select someone to be an officer in something by ballot.
We elected you to office, so do your job. Tom was elected to the congress.

per the meaning we need elect as - only in B




Why cant "had" be used here..
I mean there are 2 time periods compared..so present perfect tense could be used...


You meant past perfect, I suppose ("had been elected" is past perfect tense).
The election of 1932 is the latter event - past perfect is used for the earlier event. Therefore simple past "was elected", not past perfect "had been elected", is correct.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Status:GMAT Coach
Posts: 170
Own Kudos [?]: 284 [0]
Given Kudos: 65
Location: Peru
GPA: 3.98
Send PM
Re: Not until 1932, nearly a century and a half after the first senatorial [#permalink]
What I do not understand is the phrase " a women"
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Not until 1932, nearly a century and a half after the first senatorial [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne