Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 05:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Tsunami-related property damage rose 3.1 percent in the 12

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 956
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 733 [2] , given: 40

Tsunami-related property damage rose 3.1 percent in the 12 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2010, 21:25
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

41% (01:53) correct 59% (00:41) wrong based on 11 sessions
Tsunami-related property damage rose 3.1 percent in the 12 months that ended in March, considerably more than it did in the previous year.
(A) more than it did
(B) more than they did
(C) more than it was
(D) greater than
(E) greater than it was
_________________

Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 69
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 4

Re: Tsunami-related property damage [#permalink] New post 31 May 2010, 22:07
IMO E. The choice was between C and E. IMO greater is used for numbers so the choice E
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 176
WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 33

Re: Tsunami-related property damage [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2010, 07:52
Got Heavily confused between C and E.
Earlier placed my bet over C, but later looking after other post, I realised that E can also be correct.

C : damage is something uncountable, 1 Damage, 2 damage....seems absurd.

E : Greater is used to compare two quantities. Observing closely, you may realise that the sentence is indeed comparing the damage extent, and hence the use of Greater is justified.

Hope the OA is E... :roll:
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...:)
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 437
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 16

Re: Tsunami-related property damage [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2010, 20:09
IMO A
Issue of parallelism
It rose more than it did in previous year.
_________________

Never give up,,,

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1560
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 6

Re: Tsunami-related property damage [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2010, 06:17
I would pick (A). what is the OA?

Tsunami-related property damage rose 3.1 percent in the 12 months that ended in March, considerably more than it (property damage) did (rose) in the previous year.

(A) more than it did.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2010
Posts: 34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: Tsunami-related property damage [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2010, 06:25
IMO - A

Approach:

1) Property damage is singular. So remove the ones with "they"
So we are left with "A", "C", "E"

2) Now it's a question of parallelism.
If it was only "property damage was x percent" then C and E come into play (comparing property damage to previous year's property damage). But here it's "property damage ROSE x percent" which means comparison is between the "rise of property damage" and the latter part. So then choice A clearly reflects that comparison.

If you like this, feel free to give Kudos :)
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 421 [0], given: 36

Re: Tsunami-related property damage [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2010, 07:20
PLEASE LET US KNOW THE SOURCE OF THE QUESTION

THANKS

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 956
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 733 [0], given: 40

Re: Tsunami-related property damage [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2010, 09:19
OA is A. Well done clubers.
_________________

Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 421 [0], given: 36

Re: Tsunami-related property damage [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2010, 10:05
ykaiim wrote:
OA is A. Well done clubers.


Isnt "rose" suppose to go with higher??

e.g. rose higher than

Its natural to associate rise with "high"
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 79
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: Tsunami-related property damage [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2010, 20:00
Tsunami-related property damage rose 3.1 percent in the 12 months that ended in March, considerably more than it did in the previous year.

(A) more than it did
correct

(B) more than they did
they is incorrect

(C) more than it was
improper comparison (did vs was: should be "did" because "to rise" is an action)

(D) greater than
property damage is not countable (should be more than)

(E) greater than it was
property damage is not countable (should be more than)
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2318
Followers: 278

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Tsunami-related property damage rose 3.1 percent in the 12 [#permalink] New post 14 Mar 2014, 03:59
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 295
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 27

Re: Tsunami-related property damage rose 3.1 percent in the 12 [#permalink] New post 14 Mar 2014, 04:04
ykaiim wrote:
Tsunami-related property damage rose 3.1 percent in the 12 months that ended in March, considerably more than it did in the previous year.
(A) more than it did
(B) more than they did
(C) more than it was
(D) greater than
(E) greater than it was


following is my explanation. if you like it, give me kudos

if there is a form of "to be" in the second half of comparion, we need a version of 'to be " in the first half. C and E are gone
"they" has not referent . B is out

D means
damage rose 3.1 percent, greater than it rose
"greater " is adjectival and D compares verb. D is out.
_________________

If anyone in this gmat forum is in England,Britain, pls, email to me, (thanghnvn@gmail.com) . I have some questions and need your advise. Thank a lot.

Re: Tsunami-related property damage rose 3.1 percent in the 12   [#permalink] 14 Mar 2014, 04:04
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Employment costs rose up 2.8 percent in the 12 months that imadkho 8 22 Mar 2012, 09:55
6 Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months calvinhobbes 8 21 Mar 2010, 08:50
2 Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ... DenisSh 7 11 Oct 2009, 08:05
3 Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that jjhko 9 03 Sep 2006, 11:16
Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that Matador 7 06 Apr 2006, 14:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Tsunami-related property damage rose 3.1 percent in the 12

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.