Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 31 Aug 2014, 00:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2005, 09:26
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.
The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?
(A) Of all the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(B)Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front-seat passengers in Dole County always wear seat belts when traveling by car.
(C) More drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey than rear-seat passengers were very severely injured.
(D) More than half of the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(E) Most of the auto accidents reported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.

an explanation of correct answer will be appreciated.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Survey [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2005, 19:09
shweta_dalmia wrote:
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.
The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?
(A) Of all the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(B)Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front-seat passengers in Dole County always wear seat belts when traveling by car.
(C) More drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey than rear-seat passengers were very severely injured.
(D) More than half of the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(E) Most of the auto accidents reported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.

an explanation of correct answer will be appreciated.


This is a really weird question. Unless I am totally missing the point here. I'd go with C, and will try to explain if its correct.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1736
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Survey [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2005, 20:06
Welcom you SWETA in the discussion forum.

Also thank you for posting the question for discussion and clearification as well. But it would be better if you post the verbal (and math ) question(s) in its(their) respective place(s). for verbal, pls follow the link to place your questions and querries: http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/index.php.

Hope moderators move this question to the right place.

About the answer, definetly A is correct. if the people in the survey represent more than 20% as drivers and front seat passangers, the conclusion is properly drawn.

Last edited by HIMALAYA on 14 Aug 2005, 17:43, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 43
Location: North Carolina
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Survey [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2005, 13:13
The Correct Answer is Option A.
It connects the Accidents, Dole County and that figure is just to confuse you i.e 20%.

But, the post is a very good one.

Keep posting like the ones.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 3
Location: Massachusetts
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2005, 19:50
The answer is B. The survey of accident victims says that 80% were not wearing seat belts. To make a connection between not wearing a seat belt and the propensity of having an accident, it must be known that in the entire population (not just accident victims) much less than 80% do not wear the belt. i.e in other words, the rate of finding a non-belt-wearer is much higher among accident victims than otherwise. This is what B says.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 3
Location: Massachusetts
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Survey [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2005, 19:52
[quote="pjreddy_rec"]The Correct Answer is Option A.

It connects the Accidents, Dole County and that figure is just to confuse you i.e 20%.

But, the post is a very good one.

Keep posting like the ones.[/quote]

This answer is misguiding. In CR, you don't "connect words". You make a logical reasoning. Try to understand the question and solve it!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 3
Location: Massachusetts
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Survey [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2005, 19:57
pjreddy_rec:
Your answer is misguiding. In CR, you don't "connect words". You make a logical reasoning. Try to understand the question and solve it!
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 43
Location: North Carolina
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Survey [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2005, 07:38
I appreciate your suggestion and explanation, but I feel there is flaw in your reasoning.

The reasoning says

80% hurt while driving are not wearing seat belts in the survey.
This implies
20% are wearing seat belts and not hurt in the survey.

This is what option A says.

Option B correctly indicates that 20% wear seat belts while driving.
But it does not indicate how many of them were wearing seat belts at the time of accident.
If it would have mentioned that 20% were wearing seat belts at the time of accident, then option B could have been considered for answer.

Shweta: You are the one to solve the tuggle between A and B. can you please do that.
_________________

Jeevan

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 405
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Aug 2005, 09:57
actually, this is the what i have:

80% of the people injured and not wearing a seatbelt

implies

20% of the people injured and wearing a seatbelt
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 05:39
Premise:
1) of the severly injured drivers and font seat passenger, 80% were not wearing seat belts at the time of accident

Conclusion:
2) By wearing seat belt, passengers/driver can reduce risk of being severly injured

A is good. It tells us a small percentage (20%) wore seat belt and resulted in less severe injuries
B is not important
c is too vague. Rear seat passengers were less severly injured perhaps because they need not bear the brunt of the impact
D is not helpful
E is out of scope

I'll take A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 09:26
IMO it is B,

Let us say there are 1000 drivers in Dole. 10 severe accident, 8 did not wear seat belt. 2 wore it, now let us assume B is not true and only 20% wear seat belt in dole county, 800 people are driving around without seat belt this is a large proportion, so obviously more accident will involve people without seat belt, because most of them are driving without seat belt, so to make the claim genuine the proportion of people wearing seat belt should be more than 20%.
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 27
Location: Pattikadu
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 09:43
ranga, i am with your opinion.

large proportion to get possibility makes sense.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 167
Location: Atlanta , GA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 10:36
It is "C"
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2005, 02:31
I am positive it is A

GA
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2004
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Survey [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2005, 17:32
The answer is A.

If 99% of all drivers didn't wear a seat belt, would it be any surprise that non-seat belt drivers were 80% of the severely injured population? Of course not.

Only A rules out that possibility
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Survey [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2005, 19:06
Epiphany wrote:
The answer is A.

If 99% of all drivers didn't wear a seat belt, would it be any surprise that non-seat belt drivers were 80% of the severely injured population? Of course not.

Only A rules out that possibility


(A) Of all the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.

so if 99% (a number more than 20%) wore seat belt and got in accident (that is why they are in survey) then the conclusion is still improperly drawn, because they got in accident inspite of wearing seat belt....so A does not help IMO
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 25
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2005, 19:33
Wow... good question. I like the choice "C"
  [#permalink] 01 Sep 2005, 19:33
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County chitownguy 0 13 Jan 2006, 20:46
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County chitownguy 9 13 Jan 2006, 20:42
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County nakib77 8 01 Nov 2005, 03:19
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County rahulraao 6 13 Sep 2005, 02:25
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County cybera 5 15 Jul 2005, 20:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.