Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Apr 2014, 19:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Biologists have advanced two theories to explain

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 54
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2012, 16:07
Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish occurs in so many fish species. Because schooling is particularly widespread among species of small fish, both theories assume that schooling offers the advantage of some protection from predators.
Proponents of theory A dispute the assumption that a school of thousands of fish is highly visible. Experiments have shown that any fish can be seen, even in very clear water, only within a sphere of 200 meters in diameter. When fish are in a compact group, the spheres of visibility overlap. Thus the chance of a predator finding the school is only slightly greater than the chance of the predator finding a single fish swimming alone. Schooling is advantageous to the individual fish because a predator's chance of finding any particular fish swimming in the school is much smaller than its chance of finding at least one of the same group of fish if the fish were dispersed throughout an area.

However, critics of theory A point out that some fish form schools even in areas where predators are abundant and thus little possibility of escaping detection exists. They argue that the school continues to be of value to its members even after detection. They advocate theory B, the "confusion effect," which can be explained in two different ways. Sometimes, proponents argue, predators simply cannot decide which fish to attack. This indecision supposedly results from a predator's preference for striking prey that is distinct from the rest of the school in appearance. In many schools the fish are almost identical in appearance, making it difficult for a predator to select one. The second explanation for the "confusion effect" has to do with the sensory confusion caused by a large number of prey moving around the predator. Even if the predator makes the decision to attack a particular fish, the movement of other prey in the school can be distracting. The predator's difficulty can be compared to that of a tennis player trying to hit a tennis ball when two are approaching
simultaneously.
1. According to the passage, theory B states that which of the following is a factor that enables a schooling fish to escape predators?
(A) The tendency of fish to form compact groups
(B) The movement of other fish within the school
(C) The inability of predators to detect schools
(D) The ability of fish to hide behind one another in a school
(E) The great speed with which a school can disperse
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


2. According to the passage, both theory A and theory B have been developed to explain how
(A) fish hide from predators by forming schools
(B) forming schools functions to protect fish from predators ·
(C) schooling among fish differs from other protective behaviors
(D) small fish are able to make rapid decisions
(E) small fish are able to survive in an environment densely populated by large predators
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


3. According to one explanation of the "confusion effect," a fish that swims in a school will have greater advantages for survival if it
(A) tends to be visible for no more than 200 meters
(B) stays near either the front or the rear of a school
(C) is part of a small school rather than a large school
(D) is very similar in appearance to the other fish in the school
(E) is medium-sized
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D


4. The author is primarily concerned with
(A) discussing different theories
(B) analyzing different techniques
(C) defending two hypotheses
(D) refuting established beliefs
(E) revealing new evidence
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

Current Student
Status: Now or never
Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 326
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 26

GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2012, 04:37
My take BBDA , cant believe got all correct :)
_________________

Please press KUDOS if you like my post

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 209
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 44

Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2012, 04:57
same this was easier one

B Even if the predator
makes the decision to attack a particular fish,
the movement of other prey in the school can
(40) be distracting.

B both theories assume that
(5) schooling offers the advantage of some protection
from predators.

D This indecision
(30) supposedly results from a predator's preference for
striking prey that is distinct from the rest of the
school in appearance.


A 2nd proponents of A 3rd critics of a 1st two theories a and b
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 363
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 50

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2012, 13:01
In 5:30 Mins, I got BBDA (All correct). Question were very straight.
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain   [#permalink] 11 Aug 2012, 13:01
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Darwin was not the first to advance a theory of evolution; ywilfred 7 22 Jul 2004, 08:06
New posts Darwin was not the first to advance a theory of evolution; smandalika 3 14 Oct 2004, 03:27
New posts Darwin was not the first to advance a theory of evolution; nakib77 5 26 Oct 2005, 12:17
New posts Darwin was not the first to advance a theory of evolution; Antmavel 5 13 Nov 2005, 19:27
New posts 1 The Phlogiston theory attempted to explain combustion... aalokk 1 30 Dec 2013, 03:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Biologists have advanced two theories to explain

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.