Emarc182 wrote:
Could someone explain this concept of "aging out" to me? I understand that applicants are getting younger and younger (which, honestly, escapes me as they don't have enough, in my opinion, real work experience to allow them to take full advantage of the program), but I don't see why there would be a top-end 'age limit' per se. I would think that after the age of 27, or so, people self-select out of applying anyway, but those who do apply really are trying to make a change in their career and I would think should be judged as more valuable applicants who can bring relatively more experience to the table. I'm 27 and am applying after 3 years in Investment Banking and 2 years in Corporate Strategy, but I get the impression I am starting to be "too old" by HBS standards. Thoughts?
@Emarc182: My 2 cents. As long as you are in the 20s, age cannot be -ve factor in the application. That said, of course the theory still holds that less experience should be balanced with more star academic/extrac qualities. Yes HBS is opening doors for early 20s but this by no means translate into the majority of the class being early 20s. The realistic majority in my opinion are people like you with (3-5 yrs) WE and in their mid-late 20s. The only way I would see age becoming a negative factor is if you cross the mid-30s after graduation, as recruiters start to gear for younger/more energetic candidates.