Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 10:19 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 10:19

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Alum
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4341
Own Kudos [?]: 51452 [207]
Given Kudos: 2326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
Schools: Ross '20 (M)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2016
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [2]
Given Kudos: 56
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2016
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 56
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2014
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [5]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club Verbal Focus: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions [#permalink]
3
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Interesting hack.

My takeaway here is, for example I am not able to think quickly of an assumption/unstated premise in the argument, this template can help me, as in I know that in 75% of the cases the assumption will fall into either of these three categories.

1.) Relevance: Something makes an impact on the conclusion
2.) Success: Something is necessary for the success of the conclusion
3.) No other factors: Nothing else apart from this will make an impact of the conclusion.

Please correct me if I havent understood correctly.

Thanks
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Jun 2016
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V27
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.2
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club Verbal Focus: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Thanks, its a helpful framework. Will try using it in the CR questions.
This framework would also work very well for the AWA section.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2016
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [4]
Given Kudos: 126
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V27
GPA: 3.11
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club Verbal Focus: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
souvik101990 wrote:

CR Crushery: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions



- by EmpowerGMAT

The 3 Main Assumptions


People like patterns because they bring order to chaos. There’s a shocking pattern that underlies 75% of CR, and it’s one of the most powerful hacks on the entire GMAT:
 
CR arguments ALWAYS make at least one of 3 assumptions. Knowing and being able to detect those assumptions will enable you to forecast the what the right option will do.
 

What the heck is an assumption anyway?



An assumption is information that an arguer takes for granted. The assumed information NEEDS to be true for the argument to work.
 
For example, think of a business plan. Business plans will make a revenue, and profitability projection, but certain assumptions are required for those projections to be accepted, such as demand, marketing, distribution, etc. Those assumptions are always itemized at the back of a business plan. If those assumptions turn out to be inaccurate/unrealistic, the business plan is rendered worthless.
 
Interestingly enough, perhaps that’s why one of the world’s most successful venture capitalist has the following advice to offer:
“We start at the back…[then] we look at the front to see what kind of business it is.”
—Tom Perkins, Co-Founder of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
 

So what are the 3 GMAT CR assumptions that can be used to hack 75% of CR?

 
1. Relevance - The group or evidence presented is actually relevant to the conclusion.
2. Success - The outcome is likely.
3. No Other Factors - There were no other factors that led to the result.
 

Let’s take a look at an example:

The Cumquat Café began advertising on our local radio station this year and was delighted to see its business increase by 10 percent over last year’s totals. Their success shows you how you can use radio advertising to make your business more profitable.
 
1. Relevance
The argument concludes that your business can use radio advertising to boost profit since the Cumquat Café did.
 
Does the argument assume that the evidence is relevant to the conclusion? Blatantly. This argument assumes that what's true of Cumquat Cafe is true of radio advertising in general. This whole argument hinges on that. If it weren't true that what was the case for Cumquat Cafe is true of radio advertising in general, then this argument would collapse.
 
2. Success
This argument also assumes higher profitability from radio advertising is likely. Do you see any proof to believe that's the case? No it's completely assumed.
 
3. No Other Factors
Does this argument ignore other possible factors that could have led to Cumquat’s increase in profit? Yes.
 
This reasoning makes the crazy assumption that there weren't other possible factors that could have caused the increase, such as better food, service, or even TV advertising for example. Maybe Cumquat Cafe got a feature write up in the local newspaper.
 
You detect a major assumption, then what?
By detecting an assumption, you are prepared to answer the question. For example, if you have a strengthen question, look for the option that makes the assumption more likely to be true, and vice versa for Weaken. Take a look at any CR question, and you are going to be shocked by how powerful this framework is. Try it after you finish reading this article.
 

Conclusion


In addition to training to read at 150 WPM (a core component of EMPOWERgmat’s Verbal tactical program), you need to know the 3 major assumptions, and you have to know them well enough so that you can instantly detect them. At that point, prepared to be amazed at how straightforward CR questions are.


Could you talk more about EMPOWERgmat’s Verbal tactical program or give link if it is already published. I am very curious about 150WPM issue, if it really that effective I want to try it :-D

By the way great post :cool


+1 If you want it too
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club Verbal Focus: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions [#permalink]
souvik101990 wrote:

CR Crushery: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions



- by EmpowerGMAT

The 3 Main Assumptions


People like patterns because they bring order to chaos. There’s a shocking pattern that underlies 75% of CR, and it’s one of the most powerful hacks on the entire GMAT:
 
CR arguments ALWAYS make at least one of 3 assumptions. Knowing and being able to detect those assumptions will enable you to forecast the what the right option will do.
 

What the heck is an assumption anyway?



An assumption is information that an arguer takes for granted. The assumed information NEEDS to be true for the argument to work.
 
For example, think of a business plan. Business plans will make a revenue, and profitability projection, but certain assumptions are required for those projections to be accepted, such as demand, marketing, distribution, etc. Those assumptions are always itemized at the back of a business plan. If those assumptions turn out to be inaccurate/unrealistic, the business plan is rendered worthless.
 
Interestingly enough, perhaps that’s why one of the world’s most successful venture capitalist has the following advice to offer:
“We start at the back…[then] we look at the front to see what kind of business it is.”
—Tom Perkins, Co-Founder of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
 

So what are the 3 GMAT CR assumptions that can be used to hack 75% of CR?

 
1. Relevance - The group or evidence presented is actually relevant to the conclusion.
2. Success - The outcome is likely.
3. No Other Factors - There were no other factors that led to the result.
 

Let’s take a look at an example:

The Cumquat Café began advertising on our local radio station this year and was delighted to see its business increase by 10 percent over last year’s totals. Their success shows you how you can use radio advertising to make your business more profitable.
 
1. Relevance
The argument concludes that your business can use radio advertising to boost profit since the Cumquat Café did.
 
Does the argument assume that the evidence is relevant to the conclusion? Blatantly. This argument assumes that what's true of Cumquat Cafe is true of radio advertising in general. This whole argument hinges on that. If it weren't true that what was the case for Cumquat Cafe is true of radio advertising in general, then this argument would collapse.
 
2. Success
This argument also assumes higher profitability from radio advertising is likely. Do you see any proof to believe that's the case? No it's completely assumed.
 
3. No Other Factors
Does this argument ignore other possible factors that could have led to Cumquat’s increase in profit? Yes.
 
This reasoning makes the crazy assumption that there weren't other possible factors that could have caused the increase, such as better food, service, or even TV advertising for example. Maybe Cumquat Cafe got a feature write up in the local newspaper.
 
You detect a major assumption, then what?
By detecting an assumption, you are prepared to answer the question. For example, if you have a strengthen question, look for the option that makes the assumption more likely to be true, and vice versa for Weaken. Take a look at any CR question, and you are going to be shocked by how powerful this framework is. Try it after you finish reading this article.
 

Conclusion


In addition to training to read at 150 WPM (a core component of EMPOWERgmat’s Verbal tactical program), you need to know the 3 major assumptions, and you have to know them well enough so that you can instantly detect them. At that point, prepared to be amazed at how straightforward CR questions are.


Well written stuff... Thanks a lot
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club Verbal Focus: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions [#permalink]
How can we extend this theory for CR questions other strengthen and weaken?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Jan 2018
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
Location: India
GPA: 2.85
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club Verbal Focus: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions [#permalink]
1
Kudos
souvik101990 wrote:

CR Crushery: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions



- by EmpowerGMAT

The 3 Main Assumptions


People like patterns because they bring order to chaos. There’s a shocking pattern that underlies 75% of CR, and it’s one of the most powerful hacks on the entire GMAT:
 
CR arguments ALWAYS make at least one of 3 assumptions. Knowing and being able to detect those assumptions will enable you to forecast the what the right option will do.
 

What the heck is an assumption anyway?



An assumption is information that an arguer takes for granted. The assumed information NEEDS to be true for the argument to work.
 
For example, think of a business plan. Business plans will make a revenue, and profitability projection, but certain assumptions are required for those projections to be accepted, such as demand, marketing, distribution, etc. Those assumptions are always itemized at the back of a business plan. If those assumptions turn out to be inaccurate/unrealistic, the business plan is rendered worthless.
 
Interestingly enough, perhaps that’s why one of the world’s most successful venture capitalist has the following advice to offer:
“We start at the back…[then] we look at the front to see what kind of business it is.”
—Tom Perkins, Co-Founder of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
 

So what are the 3 GMAT CR assumptions that can be used to hack 75% of CR?

 
1. Relevance - The group or evidence presented is actually relevant to the conclusion.
2. Success - The outcome is likely.
3. No Other Factors - There were no other factors that led to the result.
 

Let’s take a look at an example:

The Cumquat Café began advertising on our local radio station this year and was delighted to see its business increase by 10 percent over last year’s totals. Their success shows you how you can use radio advertising to make your business more profitable.
 
1. Relevance
The argument concludes that your business can use radio advertising to boost profit since the Cumquat Café did.
 
Does the argument assume that the evidence is relevant to the conclusion? Blatantly. This argument assumes that what's true of Cumquat Cafe is true of radio advertising in general. This whole argument hinges on that. If it weren't true that what was the case for Cumquat Cafe is true of radio advertising in general, then this argument would collapse.
 
2. Success
This argument also assumes higher profitability from radio advertising is likely. Do you see any proof to believe that's the case? No it's completely assumed.
 
3. No Other Factors
Does this argument ignore other possible factors that could have led to Cumquat’s increase in profit? Yes.
 
This reasoning makes the crazy assumption that there weren't other possible factors that could have caused the increase, such as better food, service, or even TV advertising for example. Maybe Cumquat Cafe got a feature write up in the local newspaper.
 
You detect a major assumption, then what?
By detecting an assumption, you are prepared to answer the question. For example, if you have a strengthen question, look for the option that makes the assumption more likely to be true, and vice versa for Weaken. Take a look at any CR question, and you are going to be shocked by how powerful this framework is. Try it after you finish reading this article.
 

Conclusion


In addition to training to read at 150 WPM (a core component of EMPOWERgmat’s Verbal tactical program), you need to know the 3 major assumptions, and you have to know them well enough so that you can instantly detect them. At that point, prepared to be amazed at how straightforward CR questions are.


Great Stuff !!
I wasn't doing too good on my CR questions,but after applying the Relevance-Success-No Other Factors Theory my accuracy has increased.

Thanks a lot.

Regards
Dhruv
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2018
Status:Current student at IIMB
Affiliations: IIM Bangalore
Posts: 384
Own Kudos [?]: 404 [1]
Given Kudos: 326
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V26
GRE 1: Q162 V149
GPA: 3.6
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: GMAT Club Verbal Focus: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
This was really a Great piece of information. Thanks for sharing.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: GMAT Club Verbal Focus: The CR Hack For 75% of CR Questions [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne