|
Author |
Message |
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 299
Location: Bangalore, India
Schools: R1:Cornell, Yale, NYU. R2: Haas, MIT, Ross
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
18
[1] , given: 0
|
1
This post received
KUDOS
The sum of first N consecutive odd integers is N^2 . What is the sum of all odd integers between 13 and 39 inclusive? (A) 351 (B) 364 (C) 410 (D) 424 (E) 450 Source: GMAT Club Tests - hardest GMAT questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 20 Sep 2008
Posts: 45
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[4] , given: 0
|
4
This post received
KUDOS
Hey,
First the sum of odd numbers between1 to 39, which represents 20 odd consecutive numbers
is 20*20 = 400, 400 - (1+ 3 + 5 + 7 +9 +11) = 364.
Hope this clear....
Jugolo1
(give kudos)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 924
Followers: 25
Kudos [?]:
92
[3] , given: 14
|
3
This post received
KUDOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2530
Followers: 41
Kudos [?]:
358
[3] , given: 19
|
3
This post received
KUDOS
ventivish wrote: The sum of first N consecutive odd integers is N^2 . What is the sum of all odd integers between 13 and 39 inclusive?
(C) 2008 GMAT Club - m20#31
* 351
* 364
* 410
* 424
* 450 how about the way that is explained in the question: The sum of consecutive odd integers from 1 to 39 = [(39+1)/2]^2 = 400 The sum of consecutive odd integers from 1 to 11 = [(11+1)/2]^2 = 36 The sum of consecutive odd integers from 13 to 39 = 400 - 36 = 364
_________________
Verbal: new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
GT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 299
Location: Bangalore, India
Schools: R1:Cornell, Yale, NYU. R2: Haas, MIT, Ross
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 0
|
GMAT TIGER wrote: ventivish wrote: The sum of first N consecutive odd integers is N^2 . What is the sum of all odd integers between 13 and 39 inclusive?
(C) 2008 GMAT Club - m20#31
* 351
* 364
* 410
* 424
* 450 how about the way that is explained in the question: The sum of consecutive odd integers from 1 to 39 = [(39+1)/2]^2 = 400 The sum of consecutive odd integers from 1 to 11 = [(11+1)/2]^2 = 36 The sum of consecutive odd integers from 13 to 39 = 400 - 36 = 364 Hi thank you, this is the OA However I used the same methodology, but I included 13 as in the sum of consecutive odd integers from 1 to 13 and subtracted that from 400, thereby getting 351 as my answer. Why do we only calculate the sum from 1 to 11? I know I am missing something, sorry if this is a stupid question!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 04 Dec 2008
Posts: 1
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
ventivish wrote: GMAT TIGER wrote: ventivish wrote: The sum of first N consecutive odd integers is N^2 . What is the sum of all odd integers between 13 and 39 inclusive?
(C) 2008 GMAT Club - m20#31
* 351
* 364
* 410
* 424
* 450 how about the way that is explained in the question: The sum of consecutive odd integers from 1 to 39 = [(39+1)/2]^2 = 400 The sum of consecutive odd integers from 1 to 11 = [(11+1)/2]^2 = 36 The sum of consecutive odd integers from 13 to 39 = 400 - 36 = 364 Hi thank you, this is the OA However I used the same methodology, but I included 13 as in the sum of consecutive odd integers from 1 to 13 and subtracted that from 400, thereby getting 351 as my answer. Why do we only calculate the sum from 1 to 11? I know I am missing something, sorry if this is a stupid question! "13 and 39 inclusive" so if you subtract 13 also then you are only finding the sum of all odd numbers from 15-39
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Posts: 14
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 5
|
i dont understand the purpose of the first statement portion of the question. how is that relevant to what the question is asking?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1900
Location: Oklahoma City
Schools: Hard Knocks
Followers: 25
Kudos [?]:
341
[2] , given: 32
|
2
This post received
KUDOS
The way this question is written makes a person use "their" way (meaning the test maker's way) and in reality, just going through add adding them all up doesn't take more than 60 seconds. 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 I approach adding these up as in pairs: 11 & 39, 13 & 37, 15 & 35, 17 & 33, 19 & 31, 21 & 29, 23 & 27. Each of these 6 pairs = 50, so 50 * 6 = 300. Then you have 39 and 25 left, that's 64, so 364. Not the most "advanced" method, but it certainly won't take over 60 seconds to complete this way.
_________________
------------------------------------
J Allen Morris
**I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a$$.
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 11
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
20² - 6² = 400 - 36
= 364
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 88
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
15
[5] , given: 1
|
5
This post received
KUDOS
A faster way to do this is
Number of odd numbers 39 inclusive = (39 - 13)/2 + 1 = 13 + 1 = 14
Average = (13+39)/2 = 26
26 * 14 = 364
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 157
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 1
|
Whats the relevance of first part of the question to the second..any idea?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 180
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
49
[0], given: 5
|
th sum of first N odd integers = N^2
so the sum of 1 to 39 inclusive
N=(39-1)/2+1=20
so N^2=400
so the sum of 1 to 11 inclusive
N=(11-1)/2+1 =6
so N^2=36
so the sum of 13 to 39 inclusive = 400-36 =364
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1322
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q V
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 64
Kudos [?]:
314
[0], given: 52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: GMAT Learner
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 672
Followers: 21
Kudos [?]:
108
[0], given: 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Trying to get into the illustrious 700 club!
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 83
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 58
|
jallenmorris wrote: The way this question is written makes a person use "their" way (meaning the test maker's way) and in reality, just going through add adding them all up doesn't take more than 60 seconds.
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
I approach adding these up as in pairs: 11 & 39, 13 & 37, 15 & 35, 17 & 33, 19 & 31, 21 & 29, 23 & 27. Each of these 6 pairs = 50, so 50 * 6 = 300. Then you have 39 and 25 left, that's 64, so 364.
Not the most "advanced" method, but it certainly won't take over 60 seconds to complete this way. I did this as well since I just froze up but the numbers were manageable. If the set was any larger I would have been done for.
_________________
I'm trying to not just answer the problem but to explain how I came up with my answer. If I am incorrect or you have a better method please PM me your thoughts. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 230
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
42
[0], given: 2
|
(13+39) = 52
52/2 = 26
26x14 = 364
Answer is B.
I would estimate this question has to be on the far easier side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 435
WE 1: Business Development
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 161
|
nitya34 wrote: S=13+15+.......+37+39
39=13+(n-1)2
=>n=14
S=0.5(14)(13+39)=364 can someone please explain me this line - 39=13+(n-1)2 where can i c a summary of ways to know the amount of N in series? thanks guys
_________________
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 230
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
42
[1] , given: 2
|
1
This post received
KUDOS
144144 wrote: nitya34 wrote: S=13+15+.......+37+39
39=13+(n-1)2
=>n=14
S=0.5(14)(13+39)=364 can someone please explain me this line - 39=13+(n-1)2 where can i c a summary of ways to know the amount of N in series? thanks guys So the problem states that it is every odd number in between 13 and 39 inclusive. To find N integers you just count off how many are included in this series (14). The line in question just sets up an equation to easily solve for N. Subtract 13, then divide by two then add one and you get N=14. To check just count off. By and large it is better to memorize that equation since there are some instances were counting off via a check is too time consuming. Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Status: GMAT once done, Going for GMAT 2nd time.
Joined: 29 Mar 2010
Posts: 35
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Schools: Anderson, Haas, Ross, Kellog, Booth, McCombs
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 3
|
jallenmorris wrote: The way this question is written makes a person use "their" way (meaning the test maker's way) and in reality, just going through add adding them all up doesn't take more than 60 seconds.
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
I approach adding these up as in pairs: 11 & 39, 13 & 37, 15 & 35, 17 & 33, 19 & 31, 21 & 29, 23 & 27. Each of these 6 pairs = 50, so 50 * 6 = 300. Then you have 39 and 25 left, that's 64, so 364.
Not the most "advanced" method, but it certainly won't take over 60 seconds to complete this way. I agree with you on this method. It is fast and easy to do rather than to think of other ways to solve as mentioned by others and then solve which will take more time.
_________________
BP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: MBA Aspirant
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 190
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 1
|
Total no of terms = n=((39-13)/2)+1 = 14
so sum = 14/2(39+13) = 364 so OA is B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
close
