Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Jun 2013, 21:07
Customize  |  Hide

OG81 Mortgage: another comparision

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2322
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
OG81 Mortgage: another comparision [#permalink] New post 09 Feb 2005, 22:28
81. In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984.
(A) income; and forty-four percent in 1984
(B) income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
(C) income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
(D) income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
(E) income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984

Discussion please.
Director
Director
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 589
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Feb 2005, 22:43
A) income; and forty-four percent in 1984
You cannot start a sentence with a conjunction I think.
What was forty-four percent?

(B) income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
Okay

(C) income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
What was forty-four percent?

(D) income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
ACKWARD

(E) income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984

What rose to forty-four percent - Is it the income or the Mortgage payment. This implies income rost to forty-four percent.
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 894
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Feb 2005, 23:53
(B)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2004
Posts: 74
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 00:02
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984.

(A) income; and forty-four percent in 1984 - Grammatically, you can start a sentence with a conjunction; it's just considered poor form. Either way, a semi-colon is used to separate two independent clauses while indicating a relationship between them.

(B) income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent - This is a grammatically correct sentence. You can safely assume that the figure discussed relates to the mortgage payments, since "of an average thirty-year-old male's income" is just one long prepositional phrase.

(C) income, and in 1984 forty-four percent - This is a disruptive comma. In order to place a comma before the "and" (or any conjunction, for that matter) in a sentence, it must be dividing two independent clauses.

(D) income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure - This is a comma splice. Because the clause after the comma is independent, the sentence needs either a conjunction to separate the two clauses (with a comma - see above), or there need to be two sentences.

(E) income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984 - "That" is a modifier that modifies "income" and not the mortgage payment. In this case, the "that" alters the meaning of the sentence altogether.

Hope this helps!
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2322
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 00:16
Is it ok to introduce "the figure" in (B)? Why can't C be right in the sense of elipse?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2004
Posts: 74
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 00:31
You can introduce the figure in B because of the semi-colon. A semi-colon generally indicates a closer elationship with the previous clause than a period does. Take for example: He ate 22 moon pies; the sheer quantity was disgusting. Another example (just to demonstrate how a semi-colon can create ties between two random thoughts): Sarah's calves are sore; she wears high-heels every day.

As for the rest of your question, I'm not sure what you mean about C in the sense of an elipse...

C is incorrect because you can't put a comma in the middle of sentence unless it serves a specific function (e.g. lists, appositives, non-essential clauses/phrases, etc). In C, the comma sets off a dependent, essential phrase - two circumstances in which commas shouldn't be used.

Did that clarify?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 60
Location: Na
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 10:54
Halahpeno,

Great explaination.As for (E),why can't that refer to the mortage payment?Is it because the subject income is closer compared to mortage payment?Please advice.Thank you.Rgds,

Anna

halahpeno wrote:
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984.

(A) income; and forty-four percent in 1984 - Grammatically, you can start a sentence with a conjunction; it's just considered poor form. Either way, a semi-colon is used to separate two independent clauses while indicating a relationship between them.

(B) income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent - This is a grammatically correct sentence. You can safely assume that the figure discussed relates to the mortgage payments, since "of an average thirty-year-old male's income" is just one long prepositional phrase.

(C) income, and in 1984 forty-four percent - This is a disruptive comma. In order to place a comma before the "and" (or any conjunction, for that matter) in a sentence, it must be dividing two independent clauses.

(D) income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure - This is a comma splice. Because the clause after the comma is independent, the sentence needs either a conjunction to separate the two clauses (with a comma - see above), or there need to be two sentences.

(E) income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984 - "That" is a modifier that modifies "income" and not the mortgage payment. In this case, the "that" alters the meaning of the sentence altogether.

Hope this helps!

_________________

We can crack the exam together

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2322
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 11:07
halahpeno wrote:
You can introduce the figure in B because of the semi-colon. A semi-colon generally indicates a closer elationship with the previous clause than a period does. Take for example: He ate 22 moon pies; the sheer quantity was disgusting. Another example (just to demonstrate how a semi-colon can create ties between two random thoughts): Sarah's calves are sore; she wears high-heels every day.

As for the rest of your question, I'm not sure what you mean about C in the sense of an elipse...

C is incorrect because you can't put a comma in the middle of sentence unless it serves a specific function (e.g. lists, appositives, non-essential clauses/phrases, etc). In C, the comma sets off a dependent, essential phrase - two circumstances in which commas shouldn't be used.

Did that clarify?



Thanks for the great explanation! For C I was thinking it may mean this:
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income, and in 1984 (it represented) forty-four percent.

Would this be correct?
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 894
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 17:28
Quote:
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income, and in 1984 (it represented) forty-four percent.


I agree with that. Sometime ellipsis will work and sometime it does not. I couldn't master about ellipsis until now.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2322
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 20:59
qhoc0010 wrote:
I couldn't master about ellipsis until now.


This means you have mastered it now, correct? ;)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2004
Posts: 74
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 23:00
HongHu - you're understanding is absolutely correct - the sentence tries to assume that you know what it's saying (which you do). The problem is the misuse of the comma. Otherwise, it would be correct, I think.

Now I see what you mean by ellipsis! :)
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 894
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 23:30
HongHu wrote:
qhoc0010 wrote:
I couldn't master about ellipsis until now.


This means you have mastered it now, correct? ;)


ah, let me rephrase it.

I cannot master about ellipsis even until now.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2322
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 23:53
halahpeno wrote:
HongHu - you're understanding is absolutely correct - the sentence tries to assume that you know what it's saying (which you do). The problem is the misuse of the comma. Otherwise, it would be correct, I think.


Do you mean that there shouldn't be a comma, or do you mean that there should be a semicolon in place of the comma?
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2322
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2005, 23:57
qhoc0010 wrote:
HongHu wrote:
qhoc0010 wrote:
I couldn't master about ellipsis until now.


This means you have mastered it now, correct? ;)


ah, let me rephrase it.

I cannot master about ellipsis even until now.


:lol:
I still haven't mastered it till now.
I have yet to master it even till now.

Hmmm not sure what is the best way to say this.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2004
Posts: 74
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Feb 2005, 11:17
[quote="HongHu"][quote="halahpeno"]HongHu - you're understanding is absolutely correct - the sentence tries to assume that you know what it's saying (which you do). The problem is the misuse of the comma. Otherwise, it would be correct, I think.
[/quote]

Do you mean that there shouldn't be a comma, or do you mean that there should be a semicolon in place of the comma?[/quote]

There should be no comma.
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1482
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 13

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2007, 09:41
HongHu wrote:
halahpeno wrote:
You can introduce the figure in B because of the semi-colon. A semi-colon generally indicates a closer elationship with the previous clause than a period does. Take for example: He ate 22 moon pies; the sheer quantity was disgusting. Another example (just to demonstrate how a semi-colon can create ties between two random thoughts): Sarah's calves are sore; she wears high-heels every day.

As for the rest of your question, I'm not sure what you mean about C in the sense of an elipse...

C is incorrect because you can't put a comma in the middle of sentence unless it serves a specific function (e.g. lists, appositives, non-essential clauses/phrases, etc). In C, the comma sets off a dependent, essential phrase - two circumstances in which commas shouldn't be used.

Did that clarify?



Thanks for the great explanation! For C I was thinking it may mean this:
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income, and in 1984 (it represented) forty-four percent.

Would this be correct?


I concur with Hong on the possible use of Ellipsis to justify C being correct. Can somebody clarify this?

I still get confused with ellipsis and parallelism sometimes....
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2797
Location: New York City
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: OG81 Mortgage: another comparision [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2007, 14:14
HongHu wrote:
81. In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984.
(A) income; and forty-four percent in 1984
wrong use of a semicolon

(B) income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
correct

(C) income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
missing a noun. makes it very unclear whether forty percent of income or mortgage. in addition, a statistic cannot stand alone. it must be a figure of 44%, an amount of 44%...etc

(D) income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
no conjunction, runon sentence

(E) income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984
that restricts its immediate referent. it is not income, but rather mortgage pmts that rose.


Discussion please.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 588
Location: Canada eh
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2007, 03:15
B

A/C are out as they're not independent clauses. B is best because they're dependent clauses, the second clause refers to the first but can stand alone as a sentence.

It's like this sentence

In 2007, I was a poor student, having literally no income; now, in 2012, my income exceeds $400 million.

Break it up:


In 2007, I was a poor student, having literally no income

now, in 2012, my income exceeds $400 million.

You can make two sentences out of it, so it's valid. But if you had:


In 2007, I was a poor student, having literally no income; now, in 2012, it exceeds $400 million.

Is wrong:

In 2007, I was a poor student, having literally no income

now, in 2012, it exceeds $400 million.

What exceeds $400M? It's not an independent clause.


ok im tired im going to bed, it's 6:15am lol. GN
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 889
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2007, 03:46
I have highlighted the parallel portions for choice C.

(C) In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income;
-----in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent(of an average thirty-year-old male's income - ellipsed portion).

Two rules are enough to eliminate other choices:
-usage of semicolon - check Elements of Style at http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk.html#5
-parallelism
  [#permalink] 30 Jul 2007, 03:46
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts troble with comparisions.... huskers 1 30 Sep 2005, 11:43
Popular new posts bankers mortgage Raghavender 12 05 Oct 2006, 04:38
New posts canadian mortgages vs usa mortgages jimjohn 2 02 Dec 2007, 09:59
New posts question about comparision belenkil 2 02 Aug 2011, 14:01
New posts Comparision question nageshshiv 1 09 Aug 2011, 22:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

OG81 Mortgage: another comparision

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.