Last visit was: 18 Jul 2025, 16:54 It is currently 18 Jul 2025, 16:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Clauses|            
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,619
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,235
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,619
Kudos: 742,548
 [168]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
150
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,619
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,235
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,619
Kudos: 742,548
 [35]
21
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aditya8062
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Last visit: 26 Nov 2020
Posts: 503
Own Kudos:
659
 [7]
Given Kudos: 61
Posts: 503
Kudos: 659
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
PiyushK
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Last visit: 19 May 2023
Posts: 599
Own Kudos:
4,879
 [2]
Given Kudos: 235
Status:Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 599
Kudos: 4,879
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was between B and C.

I selected C. Actually I was much influenced by following question and I thought concise elliptical construction will work here as well.
according-to-public-health-officials-in-1998-massachusetts-59886.html

Further I rejected option B, because I thought there is no clear antecedent for the term the figure. I thought mortgage payment represented some portion is more symbolic than numeric.

I am not convinced that it is necessary to express these ideas in separate clauses and elliptical construction in C is not acceptable.

Experts could you please help understand me that why B is preferred to C.
User avatar
PiyushK
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Last visit: 19 May 2023
Posts: 599
Own Kudos:
4,879
 [1]
Given Kudos: 235
Status:Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 599
Kudos: 4,879
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984

A. income; and forty-four percent in 1984
B. income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
C. income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
D. income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
E. income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984

Source: OG-10

Dear Mike,
Could you please help me fine tune concepts to use elliptical construction. I tried to solve above question and selected option C, but that was not the OA.
I would like to know up to what extent we can elide information and what rules we should keep in mind while testing an elliptical part. OA says C is too much elliptical :(.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,131
 [6]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,131
 [6]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PiyushK
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984

A. income; and forty-four percent in 1984
B. income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
C. income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
D. income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
E. income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984

Source: OG-10

Dear Mike,
Could you please help me fine tune concepts to use elliptical construction. I tried to solve above question and selected option C, but that was not the OA.
I would like to know up to what extent we can elide information and what rules we should keep in mind while testing an elliptical part. OA says C is too much elliptical :(.
Dear Piyush,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

First of all, here's a blog I have written on this topic:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/dropping-c ... -the-gmat/

Let me say, as official questions go, this is not the sharpest, and I completely understand why this question did not make the cut to our more recent editions.

The rough rule is: in the second branch of parallelism, we can eliminate any and all repeated words, that is, words repeated from the first branch of parallelism, IF dropping these words does not create any ambiguity. The only thing that would limit how many words we could drop would be if the resulted shortened sentence were unclear in some way.

Choice (C) drops all the repeated words. That's good. Does this create ambiguity? Hmmm. Maybe. In my opinion, I think it's rather obvious that percent is parallel to percent, but maybe someone could misunderstand this as a 44% increase over and above what it had been in 1973. Hmmm. I don't know. The only conceivable problem with (C) is if someone felt we dropped so much that it creates ambiguity of some kind. I guess it's ambiguous whether there is ambiguity --- I don't know whether that falls within GMAC's definition of ambiguity, but I know GMAC doesn't like ambiguity at all. Perhaps percents lend themselves to verbal ambiguity a little more readily than do most other topics. I don't know. I find "too much ellipsis" a weak and unpersuasive reason, in and of itself, as to why (C) is wrong.

I suspect it was precisely concerns of this sort that led GMAC to cutting this particular question.

Those are my thoughts. Any questions?
Mike :-)
User avatar
PiyushK
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Last visit: 19 May 2023
Posts: 599
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 235
Status:Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 599
Kudos: 4,879
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for reply. I think I should ignore this particular question and work on other recently published questions.
But I still have one last question: I would like to know to what the figure is referring in OA (B) ?

Thanks :)
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,131
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,131
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PiyushK
Thanks for reply. I think I should ignore this particular question and work on other recently published questions.
But I still have one last question: I would like to know to what the figure is referring in OA (B) ?

Thanks :)
Dear PiyushK,
The word "figure" is indeed a complex term with many meanings; it's one of the more complex words in the English language. One meaning is "a number," especially a real-world number in a social or political context. If, say, a politician cites statistics about unemployment or defense spending or polls, that politician is citing "figures."

Thus, the "twenty-one percent" in the first part of the sentence is a "figure."

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
abrakadabra21
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Last visit: 10 Nov 2017
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
209
 [2]
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Posts: 254
Kudos: 209
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male’s income; and forty-four percent in 1984.

(B) income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
(C) income, and in 1984 forty-four percent

I have opted for B.
Ron explanation:-
"And" doesn't provide the stark contrast we want to emphasise.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,348
 [4]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,348
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. A semi colon will entail a full fledged independent clause after the punctuation. A is gone.

2 Both sides of the conjunction and have to be // and balanced. C is gone.
3. Two independent clauses can not be joined by a comma; D is gone
4. Income that rose is wrong modification. The mortgage payments rose. E is gone

B remains dodging the above mentioned errors.
User avatar
Kesterton2017
Joined: 04 Jan 2017
Last visit: 24 Sep 2017
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I do not understand why B is correct at all!

There is a rule that states a semi coln is only used when there are two independent clauses together.

Question: In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984.

If we delete everything before the semi colon, to result in only... and forty-four percent in 1984.
The second clause of the sentance has absolutely no meaning whatsoever.

We could be talking about anything from the change in number of harvested oranges to the change in number of teeth pulled out by a dentist.

Can somebody please expain why I am wrong, regarding my semi-colon rule.

Thanks in advance
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 6,955
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kesterton2017
I do not understand why B is correct at all!

There is a rule that states a semi coln is only used when there are two independent clauses together.

Question: In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984.

If we delete everything before the semi colon, to result in only... and forty-four percent in 1984.
The second clause of the sentance has absolutely no meaning whatsoever.

We could be talking about anything from the change in number of harvested oranges to the change in number of teeth pulled out by a dentist.

Can somebody please expain why I am wrong, regarding my semi-colon rule.

Thanks in advance

Yes, in choice A, if we delete everything befor the semi colon, the remaining is meaningless. That's why the choice A is incorrect.

In choice B, the full sentence is:
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent

The second part is: In 1984 the figure was forty-four percent.

"The figure" here clearly refers to the representative of mortgage payments in an average thirty-year-old male's income. Hence, this part is full meaning.
avatar
Shiv2016
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Last visit: 14 Aug 2024
Posts: 517
Own Kudos:
207
 [4]
Given Kudos: 277
Posts: 517
Kudos: 207
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984.

In 1973………….
Mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty year-old male’s income;
And forty- four percent in 1984.

Two time scenarios (1973 and 1984)
Subject is mortgage payments.

1) A semi-colon is used to connect two independent clauses.
2) Comma+ FANBOYS is used to connect two independent clauses
• Here semi-colon+ FANBOYS is used to connect independent clause to a phrase
• ‘and forty-four percent in 1984’- it is not even a clause as it has no subject and no verb.

A. income; and forty-four percent in 1984 (OUT)
B. income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent (CORRECT as mentioned in the reasoning above)
C. income, and in 1984 forty-four percent (COMMA+ AND CONSTRUCTION IS NOT CORRECT HERE)
D. income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure (TOO WORDY AND IS NOT CONNECTED PROPERLY)
E. income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984 (THAT refers to income of thirty year old male which is non-sensical as it did not increase.)
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 850
Own Kudos:
601
 [1]
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 850
Kudos: 601
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nehanishika
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male’s income; and forty-four percent in 1984.

(A) income; and forty-four percent in 1984
(B) income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
(C) income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
(D) income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
(E) income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984

The answer is B

A is out as we have to connect two independent sentences with semicolon
B correct as the sentence after semicolon provides additional information .
C not correct although semicolon is not there but we do have a proper comparison 44 % of what.
D it awkward
E it was not the income that rose , it was mortgage payments.
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 771
Kudos: 414
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aditya8062
Quote:
I am not convinced that it is necessary to express these ideas in separate clauses and elliptical construction in C is not acceptable.

there are two reasons
firstly the parallelism is absurd here
secondly the construction "in 1984 forty-four percent" is just plain wrong !! .you cannot have a "hung up construction "forty-four percent" by itself . either u have to have "forty-four percent of "something" OR u have to refer back so some "figure" as is done in option B

also note that "ellipses" does not allow u the kind of construction that u r trying to have in option C .you cannot cherry pick a "construction" and put it as per ur need as u seem to be doing in option C
have a look as how ur ellipses wud look like in option C : In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income, and in 1984 [ mortgage payments represented] forty-four percent [of an average thirty-year-old male's income]


in the ellipsis pattern, the cut off part must be one phrase, not two phrases at two places.
consider
I learn English in 2000 and (I learn) French in 2002
I learn English well in 2000 year and (I learn) French (well) in 2002 year

the first sentence is correct, the second sentence is incorrect.

is my thinking correct?
avatar
TheRzS
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Last visit: 09 Mar 2024
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 163
Location: Australia
Posts: 59
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

GMAT weekly questions



In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984

A. income; and forty-four percent in 1984
B. income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
C. income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
D. income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
E. income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984


Hi mikemcgarry

Hope you are keeping well.
Is there any grammatical error in C? If not, would you be kind enough to explain why B is preferred?

Thanks and regards
RZS
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 850
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 850
Kudos: 601
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

GMAT weekly questions



In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income; and forty-four percent in 1984

A. income; and forty-four percent in 1984
B. income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
C. income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
D. income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
E. income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984

The answer is B
A the use of semicolon is to join two independent sentences here what follows semicolon is a fragment .
B Correct it is an independent sentence
C gain wrong wrong parallelism
D run on it is written rather awkwardly
E now this choice might seem perfectly correct grammatically but there is a meaning error .It was not the income that rose but mortgage payments.
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 771
Kudos: 414
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
why c is wrong
it takes me a few hours to think.
i have one idea.

in eliptical pattern, the cut off part must be one phrase. it can not be two phrases at two places. consider

I learn english and french.
the cut off part is one phrase, "i learn french'

i learn english with my friend in 2000 and she French her friend 2001
the cut off part is " learn...with...in"
this is impossible. the cut off part is 3 phrases in 3 places.

our problem in c is similar

do you think so?

did i invent something from gmat questions.?
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,147
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nehanishika
In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male’s income; and forty-four percent in 1984.

(A) income; and forty-four percent in 1984
(B) income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
(C) income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
(D) income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
(E) income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984

To establish the clearest comparison between circumstances in 1973 and those in 1984, a separate clause is needed to describe each year.

Choices A and C, in failing to use separate clauses, are too elliptical and therefore unclear.

Choice A also incorrectly uses and and a semicolon to separate an independent clause and a phrase.

Choice D incorrectly separates two independent clauses with a comma; moreover, the placement of in 1984 is awkward and confusing.

In choice E, that refers illogically to income, thereby producing the misstatement that income rather than mortgage payments rose to forty-four percent in 1984.

Choice B is best; two properly constructed clauses that clearly express the comparison are separated by a semicolon.
avatar
RishiQV
Joined: 20 Dec 2017
Last visit: 05 Dec 2021
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 8
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Whenever you see 'AND' after a comma, check for two possibilities :
1. a list(apples, carrots, and bananas)
2. two main clauses(I like India, and she likes South Africa)

Here, in option C, there is independent clause after 'AND'. Therefore it is incorrect.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts