redpringles wrote:
TheFool wrote:
I got dinged by Columbia on Tuesday afternoon after an interview... have been moping around since and haven't wanted to post it on the forums. Sorry for the delay, and just for the record, here was my timeline:
Submitted: 11/26
Interview invite: 12/19
Interviewed: 1/11
Interview report submitted: 1/15
Decision: 1/22
I gotta say it really sucks. I'm currently 0-for-3, and feeling less and less optimistic about my chances of getting in anywhere. Especially after that interview at Columbia which was, frankly, unfriendly.
I'm sorry to hear that. It took 2 months after your interview feedback submission to get your decision? Wow...
May I ask you how your interview was unfriendly?
Actually it wasn't two months -- I caught that right after I posted and it's been edited above. Sorry about that!! Timeline was:
Interviewed: 1/11
Interview report submitted: 1/15
Decision: 1/22
The first 50 minutes of the interview went fine. While the questions were tough ("give me a ballpark estimate of how many brand managers get hired every year" "Besides the six companies and three industries you mentioned that use brand management, what other companies recruit at Columbia for your desired field?").
I was answering them pretty well, I thought. But near the end the interviewer asked me how I chose him as my interview contact. I replied that I followed the instructions on Columbia's letter, which was to contact the first person on the list of three. He became visibly upset at this and told me that I had done it wrong: rather, I should have done research on all three Ambassadors and chose my contact that way, as in business you're supposed to vie for every advantage. I replied that while I agree in theory with that, I wasn't about to try and cross the admissions committee on this. He noted that someone he interviewed just the week prior had done this very thing, and had chosen him because they had a lot in common.
Then he started lecturing me about the importance of seizing the advantage in networking, noted that I'm competing against my fellow students "including the guy with two years' of experience at McKinsey who is just interviewing for fun, but who looks better on paper."
He then asked me why I was applying so late and to so few schools. I replied that I had applied to five schools and submitted my application to Columbia on November 20. He said that was too late and to too few schools, and didn't seem optimistic about my chances of getting in.
Honestly, none of his advice was bad or unwelcome (though I still disagree about not following Columbia's instructions), but the tone of the conversation took a very negative turn near the end. I'm not sure if I was unlucky, if I said the wrong thing, if he was trying to push my buttons or that's just his manner.
I am a long time lurker, but never posted, but I couldn't help but comment on this. That's just plain nasty. If it makes you feel better, I followed the rules too. Sounds like this interviewer just wanted you to suck up to him and tell him how badly you were dying to interview with him. Is there even any recourse for something like that??
And for others, my interview was the opposite of this (though I also got pretty detailed questions on how I would pursue my somewhat non-traditional/new field, what the background of people doing that kind of work looks like, etc.). He was so friendly & disarming, which I think is what I hear more of in the norm. Really unfortunate that Fool got one of the few bad eggs!