rocky312 wrote:
The interviewer's behaviour. I mean do I really want to attend a school with alumni like these? I understand that this can be a one-off case but it hardly left me with a positive impression of the school and their alumni.
Rocky312, I'm sorry to hear about your bad interview experience. I can imagine that it would leave you with a bad feeling about Booth. Just keep in mind that ALL schools will have alumni like this. Take Harvard, for an example. Sandy is a prominent admissions consultant for Harvard and frequently writes columns on PoetsandQuants.com. Take a look at the bolded information:
https://poetsandquants.com/2012/10/17/ho ... rview-2/4/"Sandy, what’s the best kind of interviewer an applicant can have?
If you can help it, you’ll always be better off with an interviewer with a lot of experience because they are less likely to make oddball judgments. You want a normative interviewer, someone who knows the standards and who has been through it a million times.
Alumni often have a chip on their shoulders. They may have issues with the school that can get projected in the interview. They may want to use you to deliver a message to the school, or they could have a prejudice against people who are in Teach For America or other non-profits. That happens a lot. And some alumni interviews can go on for more than an hour. They’re just so much more unpredictable."
I don't want to make it seem like I don't sympathize with your situation, I do. It really sucks. But just know that these types of things can happen at any school, even Harvard.