shadowsjc wrote:
qaum wrote:
...
the debate about what business schools look for in an applicant comes up time and time again. remember, just because 'we' think someone is a sure bet at HBS doesn't mean that adcom agrees. in short, there is no such thing as a sure bet. tons of capable people apply, and tons don't even make it to the interview phase. no one person is more deserving over another - and if they are, we certainly can't determine who these 'more deserving' people are because we don't sit on the adcom board.
i do agree there is definitely an emotional part of getting a ding or not receiving an interview invite. different people handle it different ways, so if you feel the need to vent, we definitely don't want to stop you from doing that.
one final thing, warren buffet went to columbia, not wharton.
I don't think you understood my post. You are pointing to me as the person getting emotional or venting - in this entire message I never personally contested their decision to not hand me an interview. So please be careful in saying "You" because you are confusing the universalist nature of my post.
Personally, I don't think I wanted it enough so I am not shocked I was not asked to interview... But what do you tell a paraplegic friend that changed the lives of nearly 10,000 people and saved 200 small businesses after he was forced to abandon a career advising prime ministers?
Surprisingly, he is mature enough to get past it - he's overcome this much in life, what's not getting validated by some stupid AdCom? He laughed it off, and said "That's Life" and smiled - but I know inside he feels hurt - his laughing is the way he handles his sadness - that sting of rejection. He is holding back his emotions, trying to look past it and beyond to bigger and better things in life.
My point is that it is ok to cry, it is ok to be sad, these are normal human emotions. Certainly don't need some self-righteous jerk making statements like "stop crying you didn't lose your dick."
BTW you are totally and utterly wrong about NO ONE being more deserving than another in a group of 12,000 applicants - that is quite possibly the most incorrect statement I have ever heard. We may not have transparency into AdCom, but logically we can understand that there are severe limitations to the process - that's just the nature of the beast. Hence, there is a huge level of inefficiency.
Simply knowing some of the people I have met at HBS and their level of intelligence, drive, and/or achievement, the application process is very flawed - because there are some absolute jokers sitting in that classroom today.
But ALL OF THIS IS IRRELEVANT.
Bottom-line points:
1. It's ok to be emotional about it, everyone has a right, and for good reason, it is an emotional process, and part of this forum exists for peoples' sob stories and sadness - none of our significant others, our colleagues, etc. know what this process entails - only the people who have gone through it - hence people don't need to be critical of any other person's reaction.
2. Life goes on, focus on R3 schools, and be a big fish in a small pond elsewhere. This is the best advice. There are still some really great schools out there - and you can apply to them and get in for next Fall. Then take the initiative and become a truly amazing stand-out student among your peers.
3. Keep doing what makes you great, HBS or GSB or anyone else in no way shape or form will affect the distinctive things that a truly amazing person will end up achieving. If you are a religious person, have faith and believe in fate.
4. The class of 2012 will likely go down as one of the most amazing classes of all time IMHO - if the quality of rejected applicants is any indication of the kind of people that get admitted. Hence, if you are admitted, know you are likely going to be part of a very special class of exceptional students.
BTW Buffett went to Wharton for 2 years undergrad - then Columbia for MBA. I was right about Wharton, wrong about where he got his MBA.