Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 09:39 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 09:39

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 244
Own Kudos [?]: 4419 [13]
Given Kudos: 325
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 871
Own Kudos [?]: 8554 [11]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Send PM
General Discussion
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4386
Own Kudos [?]: 32882 [0]
Given Kudos: 4455
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 75 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: A recent study indicated that most [#permalink]
IMO C
Expl 1:Laconian police salaries are not sufficient for families with teenage children.
Expl 2: Laconian police have to serve for twenty years to receive government pensions, and by the time they are forty most of them become eligible for this pension and retire.

Knowing which of the following would best help choose between the two explanations offered in the argument above?


(A)Whether the proportion of police who are at least 40 years old varies significantly among different departments of the police force in Laconia.<The proportion 20:80 or 80:20 is not going to help why policemen leaving the job at 40>.

(B)Whether a significant proportion of Laconian police leave the force because they consider it dangerous to continue serving after they turn forty, when they are no longer as physically fit as they were.<this mentions a new reason to leave the job>

(C)Whether the majority of police officers who are older than 40 entered the force at a significantly older age than did those who had resigned by the time they were 40. <This helps in explaining either of the explanation. Policemen joined late the service have to complete 20 years of service to get pension.>

(D)Whether most of those who join the Laconian police force do so to earn money or because they consider it prestigious.<most means how many? 60,70 or 80 not clear.>

(E)Whether police officers who continue to serve in the Laconian police force after they turn 40 have more promotional opportunities than their younger colleagues have.<completely out of scope>
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2015
Posts: 197
Own Kudos [?]: 346 [0]
Given Kudos: 57
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Send PM
Re: A recent study indicated that most [#permalink]
B
Clearly if they joined at an significantly older age would not be eligible for pension
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 44
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Nonprofit
GPA: 3.7
WE:Marketing (Advertising and PR)
Send PM
A recent study indicated that most [#permalink]
I hardly understand the question? Is the question good for practicing?

The argument is about whether it is all about pension or the salary. Am I right?
I can eliminate B and D.
B is about physical fitness while D is about prestige.
A is OFS for sure.
E is about promotional opprtunities.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2022
Posts: 40
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
Send PM
Re: A recent study indicated that most [#permalink]
guerrero25 wrote:
A recent study indicated that most Laconian police are below forty years of age. Some attribute this to the fact that Laconian police salaries are not sufficient for families with teenage children. An alternative explanation is that Laconian police have to serve for twenty years to receive government pensions, and by the time they are forty most of them become eligible for this pension and retire.

Knowing which of the following would best help choose between the two explanations offered in the argument above?

(A)Whether the proportion of police who are at least 40 years old varies significantly among different departments of the police force in Laconia.
(B)Whether a significant proportion of Laconian police leave the force because they consider it dangerous to continue serving after they turn forty, when they are no longer as physically fit as they were.
(C)Whether the majority of police officers who are older than 40 entered the force at a significantly older age than did those who had resigned by the time they were 40.
(D)Whether most of those who join the Laconian police force do so to earn money or because they consider it prestigious.
(E)Whether police officers who continue to serve in the Laconian police force after they turn 40 have more promotional opportunities than their younger colleagues have.


A. age variation in different police departments? Irrelevant.
B. "consider it dangerous to serving "? This statement provides an alternative explantion but does not verift the claim. No impact on the evaluation.
C. Correct. This statement tests whether the old police are old because they have served the force for many years.
D. Similar to B, D provides alternative explanations yet totally irrelevant to the claim.
E. "promotional opportunities"?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A recent study indicated that most [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne