Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 07:49 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 07:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
guerrero25
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Last visit: 13 Nov 2019
Posts: 244
Own Kudos:
5,064
 [17]
Given Kudos: 325
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
Posts: 244
Kudos: 5,064
 [17]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
pqhai
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Last visit: 26 Nov 2015
Posts: 867
Own Kudos:
8,883
 [12]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Posts: 867
Kudos: 8,883
 [12]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,021
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vivmechster
Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Last visit: 02 May 2016
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 46
Kudos: 78
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO C
Expl 1:Laconian police salaries are not sufficient for families with teenage children.
Expl 2: Laconian police have to serve for twenty years to receive government pensions, and by the time they are forty most of them become eligible for this pension and retire.

Knowing which of the following would best help choose between the two explanations offered in the argument above?


(A)Whether the proportion of police who are at least 40 years old varies significantly among different departments of the police force in Laconia.<The proportion 20:80 or 80:20 is not going to help why policemen leaving the job at 40>.

(B)Whether a significant proportion of Laconian police leave the force because they consider it dangerous to continue serving after they turn forty, when they are no longer as physically fit as they were.<this mentions a new reason to leave the job>

(C)Whether the majority of police officers who are older than 40 entered the force at a significantly older age than did those who had resigned by the time they were 40. <This helps in explaining either of the explanation. Policemen joined late the service have to complete 20 years of service to get pension.>

(D)Whether most of those who join the Laconian police force do so to earn money or because they consider it prestigious.<most means how many? 60,70 or 80 not clear.>

(E)Whether police officers who continue to serve in the Laconian police force after they turn 40 have more promotional opportunities than their younger colleagues have.<completely out of scope>
avatar
apoorv601
Joined: 21 May 2015
Last visit: 27 Nov 2017
Posts: 197
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B
Clearly if they joined at an significantly older age would not be eligible for pension
avatar
skidstorm
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Last visit: 02 Jun 2018
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Nonprofit
GPA: 3.7
WE:Marketing (Advertising and PR)
Posts: 18
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I hardly understand the question? Is the question good for practicing?

The argument is about whether it is all about pension or the salary. Am I right?
I can eliminate B and D.
B is about physical fitness while D is about prestige.
A is OFS for sure.
E is about promotional opprtunities.
User avatar
JoeKan1234
Joined: 27 Aug 2022
Last visit: 23 Dec 2024
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 65
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
guerrero25
A recent study indicated that most Laconian police are below forty years of age. Some attribute this to the fact that Laconian police salaries are not sufficient for families with teenage children. An alternative explanation is that Laconian police have to serve for twenty years to receive government pensions, and by the time they are forty most of them become eligible for this pension and retire.

Knowing which of the following would best help choose between the two explanations offered in the argument above?

(A)Whether the proportion of police who are at least 40 years old varies significantly among different departments of the police force in Laconia.
(B)Whether a significant proportion of Laconian police leave the force because they consider it dangerous to continue serving after they turn forty, when they are no longer as physically fit as they were.
(C)Whether the majority of police officers who are older than 40 entered the force at a significantly older age than did those who had resigned by the time they were 40.
(D)Whether most of those who join the Laconian police force do so to earn money or because they consider it prestigious.
(E)Whether police officers who continue to serve in the Laconian police force after they turn 40 have more promotional opportunities than their younger colleagues have.

A. age variation in different police departments? Irrelevant.
B. "consider it dangerous to serving "? This statement provides an alternative explantion but does not verift the claim. No impact on the evaluation.
C. Correct. This statement tests whether the old police are old because they have served the force for many years.
D. Similar to B, D provides alternative explanations yet totally irrelevant to the claim.
E. "promotional opportunities"?
User avatar
rak08
Joined: 01 Feb 2025
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 338
Location: India
GPA: 7.14
Products:
Posts: 236
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I feel this is a weird question and not a GMAT question, so is it wise to skip this?
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts