GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 12 Dec 2019, 17:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A recent study indicated that most

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 262
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
A recent study indicated that most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 13 Oct 2013, 09:48
1
7
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

65% (02:04) correct 35% (02:24) wrong based on 578 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A recent study indicated that most Laconian police are below forty years of age. Some attribute this to the fact that Laconian police salaries are not sufficient for families with teenage children. An alternative explanation is that Laconian police have to serve for twenty years to receive government pensions, and by the time they are forty most of them become eligible for this pension and retire.

Knowing which of the following would best help choose between the two explanations offered in the argument above?

(A)Whether the proportion of police who are at least 40 years old varies significantly among different departments of the police force in Laconia.
(B)Whether a significant proportion of Laconian police leave the force because they consider it dangerous to continue serving after they turn forty, when they are no longer as physically fit as they were.
(C)Whether the majority of police officers who are older than 40 entered the force at a significantly older age than did those who had resigned by the time they were 40.
(D)Whether most of those who join the Laconian police force do so to earn money or because they consider it prestigious.
(E)Whether police officers who continue to serve in the Laconian police force after they turn 40 have more promotional opportunities than their younger colleagues have.

Originally posted by guerrero25 on 12 Oct 2013, 16:15.
Last edited by guerrero25 on 13 Oct 2013, 09:48, edited 1 time in total.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 982
Location: United States
Re: A recent study indicated that most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2013, 23:58
11
ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: Most Laconian police are below forty years of age.
Reason 1: Laconian police salaries are not sufficient for families with teenage children ==> they reach 40 when their children are teenage ==> they have to quit/change job when they get near 40 because they can't afford their teenage children expenses.
Reason 2: Laconian police have to serve for twenty years to receive government pensions, and by the time they are forty most of them become eligible for this pension and retire. ==> They quit job when they are eligible for pension.

Question: Knowing which of the following would best help choose between the two explanations offered in the argument above?
KEY is question stem: The question just ask to choose which explanation is better. The question does NOT ask to find another explanation, thus weaken both explanations in the stimulus.

(A)Whether the proportion of police who are at least 40 years old varies significantly among different departments of the police force in Laconia.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about different department.

(B)Whether a significant proportion of Laconian police leave the force because they consider it dangerous to continue serving after they turn forty, when they are no longer as physically fit as they were.
Wrong. TEMPTING. B tells us another explanation ==> B weakens both explanation in the stimulus. Thus, B does not help us choose the better explanation between the two.

(C)Whether the majority of police officers who are older than 40 entered the force at a significantly older age than did those who had resigned by the time they were 40.
IMO, Correct. C tells us that police officers who entered the force late have to work continuously even when they get 40. Why? Because if they do not work 20 years in the force, they are not eligible for pension. In addition, C also weakens the first explanation, which says that those who are more 40 years old will quit job because of low salaries. In fact, the main reason they continue working is because they want to be eligible for pension.

(D)Whether most of those who join the Laconian police force do so to earn money or because they consider it prestigious.
Wrong. Out of scope. D does not say anything why most police officers are below 40 years old.

(E)Whether police officers who continue to serve in the Laconian police force after they turn 40 have more promotional opportunities than their younger colleagues have.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about "Promotional opportunities".

Waiting for OA.

Best.
##### General Discussion
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3416
Re: A recent study indicated that most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2013, 04:47
IMO C

I think that the argyment is not so consistent as a real gmat like question, though is a good question.

Here process of elimination helkps you even wheter you understand the argument or not, generally speaking
_________________
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Posts: 53
Re: A recent study indicated that most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2013, 05:51
IMO C
Expl 1:Laconian police salaries are not sufficient for families with teenage children.
Expl 2: Laconian police have to serve for twenty years to receive government pensions, and by the time they are forty most of them become eligible for this pension and retire.

Knowing which of the following would best help choose between the two explanations offered in the argument above?

(A)Whether the proportion of police who are at least 40 years old varies significantly among different departments of the police force in Laconia.<The proportion 20:80 or 80:20 is not going to help why policemen leaving the job at 40>.

(B)Whether a significant proportion of Laconian police leave the force because they consider it dangerous to continue serving after they turn forty, when they are no longer as physically fit as they were.<this mentions a new reason to leave the job>

(C)Whether the majority of police officers who are older than 40 entered the force at a significantly older age than did those who had resigned by the time they were 40. <This helps in explaining either of the explanation. Policemen joined late the service have to complete 20 years of service to get pension.>

(D)Whether most of those who join the Laconian police force do so to earn money or because they consider it prestigious.<most means how many? 60,70 or 80 not clear.>

(E)Whether police officers who continue to serve in the Laconian police force after they turn 40 have more promotional opportunities than their younger colleagues have.<completely out of scope>
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2015
Posts: 213
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Re: A recent study indicated that most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jun 2015, 23:00
B
Clearly if they joined at an significantly older age would not be eligible for pension
_________________
Apoorv

I realize that i cannot change the world....But i can play a part
Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 24
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Nonprofit
GPA: 3.7
A recent study indicated that most  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2018, 11:03
I hardly understand the question? Is the question good for practicing?

The argument is about whether it is all about pension or the salary. Am I right?
I can eliminate B and D.
A is OFS for sure.
A recent study indicated that most   [#permalink] 27 Jan 2018, 11:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by