Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 16:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2004
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [1] , given: 0

The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2004, 17:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:36) correct 43% (02:12) wrong based on 989 sessions
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a drop in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
B. Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.
C. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
D. The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.
E. The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 83
Location: New York City
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [3] , given: 0

Re: CR: Assumption [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2004, 17:27
3
This post received
KUDOS
C. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.

This choice is the correct one - the author is assuming the time it takes to assembly one TV in Borodian has not changed. For if it had decreased, the whole argument would collaps > there would be less workers producing the same number of TVsets.
The argument doesn't mention that number of TVs decreased.

Last edited by michalky on 11 Oct 2004, 17:30, edited 1 time in total.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2004, 17:27
only A resolves the paradox
If workers from B decreased, in order for B to show increased imports from V, V has to have increased the number of workers by at least as much as the # of workers that left B
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 971
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Assumption [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2004, 17:51
Both A and C look good.

A talks of propotionate number increase in Vernland, which sounds logical to the argument.
C indicates that total demand of TVs was met by less number of assemblers. logical.

I will take A and move on.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 394
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Assumption [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2004, 22:22
I got A as the answer.
The conclusion is that the imports from Vernland to Borodia have increased. It means that the demand for assemblers is more in Vernland than in Borodia which justifies the recent statistics.

B - 'features' is extraneous

C - 'number of hours' is irrelevant'

D - 'during the past 3 years' is unjustifiable as far as 'recent statistics.

E - 'next few years' does not help up in arriving athe conclusion.

linker wrote:
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a droip in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
B. Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.
C. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
D. The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.
E. The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.

_________________

Awaiting response,

Thnx & Rgds,
Chandra

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 42
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Oct 2004, 14:40
A.
I think the key is to differentiate between an assumption question and an inference question. Several answers could be infered, but A is the one which logically connects with the conclusion IMO.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 366
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Assumption [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2004, 02:51
linker wrote:
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a droip in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
B. Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.
C. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
D. The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.
E. The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.


Why not "D" ?
Author says :
"Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed."

Conclusion: " the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased. "

Dharmin
_________________

Perseverance, Hard Work and self confidence

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2004, 03:19
The reason why D is not as strong as A is because it says "significantly". What if Borodia now imports about 100 TVs from Vernland(instead of the usual 50) but yet, Vernland now produce 100,100 instead of 100,050 TVs due to this increased demand. Vernland could be a very large country whereby the increased demand by Borodia could have a very small impact on its overall production. Can we say that Vernland increased its assembling significantly?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1709
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

CR: TV Assemblers [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2005, 02:24
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a droip in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
B. Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.
C. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
D. The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.
E. The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1735
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: TV Assemblers [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2005, 08:19
C. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1709
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2005, 19:52
Hey mountain :-D , Can you please explain this?

This is from the ETS test...

I don't have an OA for this!
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 577
Location: NYC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2005, 20:08
i would argue C with D/A with D being my answer..
the drop of the tariff's was the cause of the increase in imports and hence vern** must have increased its production to match the imported goods for Barodians
_________________

Success is my only option, failure is not -- Eminem

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 996
Location: South Korea
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2005, 21:56
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a droip in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.

I believe this is clearly (C).

It is true that there was a drop in the number of television assemblers in Borodia.

But the total number of television sets assembled in Borodia does not need to be decreased, if the average number of hours taken to assemble one television set has significantly decreased.

Like this:

Before
- Number of TV assemblers = 10
- Average hour needed per one TV set = 2
- Number of TV sets assembled per day = 120

After
- Number of TV assemblers = 5
- Average hour needed per one TV set = 1
- Number of TV sets assembled per day = 120

Therefore, if the average hour needed to assemble one TV set is decreased, Borodia does not need to import more TV sets.



However, (D) doesn't have to be assumed since there also is a possibility that Vernland reduced the local sales of the TV sets and increased export, or that the demand for TV sets in Vernland decreased.
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn :twisted: !

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 577
Location: NYC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Dec 2005, 12:03
gamajatang,
sorry to bother you.. but can you help me a lil bit here.. I am sure your answer is right. I just want to understand this completely..

So, the argument here is ..??


Can you break it.. into premises.. like argument, conclusion and assumption.. thanks..
_________________

Success is my only option, failure is not -- Eminem

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland [#permalink] New post 17 Dec 2005, 10:35
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a droip in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
B. Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.
C. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
D. The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.
E. The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.
_________________

hey ya......

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1061
Location: CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: CR # 2 [#permalink] New post 17 Dec 2005, 13:46
Wage lower in Vernland
No tarrifs no Vernland imports ==> no change in TV sale in Borodia ==> imports did not increase domestic sales

Number of Borodia assemblers decreased ==> imports from Vernland increased? ==> domestic sales decreased

A. The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased. Correct! Negating this statement, argument would not hold true

B. Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have. Out of scope

C. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years. Hours are not discussed

D. The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years. Number of TVs assembled is not discussed.

E. The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years. Out of scope
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 53
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Dec 2005, 16:11
Closer look at the options

A. The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased. -- The average wage has decreased in Vernland compared to Borodia ,, so may be true

B. Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have. -- Features are not discussed

C. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years. -- No of hours are not discussed


D. The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years. -- No of televisions sold may not be the correct assumption for decrease in average wages

E. The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years. -- The passage does not conclude anything like this

I vote for A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 399
Location: Chicago, IL
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 17

 [#permalink] New post 17 Dec 2005, 18:16
A it is.

A correctly identifies the key assumption of the argument. Negating this consumption will make a conclusion highly improbable.

For questions like this one, probably the best way to spot and check the correct answer is using Kaplan's denial test.
_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1735
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Dec 2005, 20:23
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

CR - SET 23 Q3 [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2007, 10:18
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a droip in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
B. Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.
C. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
D. The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.
E. The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.

Debated over A & D....finally I picked D....views with explanations are invited!
CR - SET 23 Q3   [#permalink] 29 Sep 2007, 10:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The average hourly wage of shoe factory workers in Manoda ar dqtuan9627 0 07 May 2014, 01:04
9 The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland umeshpatil 7 30 Apr 2013, 21:48
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland mun23 0 17 Mar 2013, 01:00
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland TomB 0 26 Mar 2012, 22:17
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland linker 0 29 Aug 2012, 19:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 71 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.