Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 19 May 2013, 08:18

Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1719
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 34

Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary [#permalink]  17 May 2011, 04:45
00:00

Difficulty:

80% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (02:14) correct 45% (01:28) wrong based on 25 sessions
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 944
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 121

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals [#permalink]  17 May 2011, 08:05
This is a causal arg. Hence the defender will avoid the alternate cause.

Since the number of childern being sent for treatment is on the rise the counterargument can be - more children are being sent for treatment to nurse hence more are being reported sick. The defender will avoid such a controversy and prevent the arg from getting weakened. Hence C

subhashghosh wrote:
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 192
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 40

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals [#permalink]  17 May 2011, 08:17
Why it can't be (B)?
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1719
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 34

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals [#permalink]  17 May 2011, 08:22
@ulm, please negate choice B and see the result.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1400
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 10

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals [#permalink]  17 May 2011, 11:01
close call between A and C here.

Negating A means that as the number of nurses has decreased,even though the number of children sent remains the same,children seen/nurse has increased.

Negating C means it is more likely that children will be sent to the nurses now than earlier.

C seems closer to the conclusion here. The number of nurses hasn't been discussed in the stem.

Hence C preferred.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 278
Schools: Columbia, INSEAD, RSM, LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 4

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals [#permalink]  17 May 2011, 19:15
C
Intern
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 4
Location: bangalore, India
Schools: Stanford,MIT, Harvard, Kellogg, LBS, IESE, IE etc
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals [#permalink]  20 Jun 2011, 23:31
Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years
option C is contradicting the information given in the arguement..

i think C is wrong

i think option D is correct because if there is no usage of chemicals in the home then chemicals are only used in the schools & hence children got affected by that chemical

please explain if i am wrong
Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 180
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 13

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals [#permalink]  21 Jun 2011, 00:26
C
Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 152
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 21

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals [#permalink]  21 Jun 2011, 05:51
Please can somebody explain it more clearly.I donot understand the logic behind both B and C.
_________________

target:-810 out of 800!

Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 180
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 13

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals [#permalink]  21 Jun 2011, 05:55
Well indeed it says that the number of children going to nurses now has increased. The next sentence says: Therefore, EITHER, its due to more exposure or the kids just became more sensitive THAN 10 years ago..

In that way C does fit best..
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2012
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 11

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary [#permalink]  14 Sep 2012, 23:21
@Antik
If B is assumed, It is likely that children go to nurses for a different sort of allergic reaction. However, the passage specified the type of allergy, allergy to chemicals. So, b is beyond the scope of the passage.

If the increase is due to a higher tendency to go to nurses now than 10 years a go, we rule out or question such causes as more sensitivity or exposure. Thus the argument does not hold with out assuming what is mentioned in C. C is correct.
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2012
Posts: 12
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [1] , given: 3

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary [#permalink]  30 Sep 2012, 03:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
Question Stem
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
Assumption Question- Ask the question - what is required so that the conclusion is true. Also use the negation test on last 2 option choices.

Argument
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of school children sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago.

Pre-thinking
More children became aware of the symptoms and reported the same. So they were sent to the nurses.

Answer Choices

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
INCORRECT ANSWER - This answer could have been correct if the argument did not mention "PROPORTION". Even if the nurses reduced, the proportion calculation would still remain the same -
\frac{No of students sent}{Total no of students}

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.
INCORRECT ANSWER - "other substances" is outside the scope of the argument

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
CORRECT ANSWER - If the chance that children are sent to the nurse is same, then the conclusion is true.

Negation Test - Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago - So this statement rules out both the options in the conclusion. So this is the CORRECT ANSWER.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
INCORRECT ANSWER - If not used commonly then the chemical may not be a reason. It weakens the conclusion.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
INCORRECT ANSWER - "larger proportion of Renston’s population" - this does not matter. The argument is not talking about this but the proportion of students sent to nurses.
_________________

Regards,
gmatsuperstar

Senior Manager
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 324
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 46

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary [#permalink]  17 Apr 2013, 05:15
subhashghosh wrote:
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.

I picked d.Need every options explanation
Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2012
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary [#permalink]  17 Apr 2013, 06:29
Quote:
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.
C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.

Paraphrasing the main point: According to nurses, something has changed in the past 10 years to make schoolchildren more sensitive to chemicals.
Paraphrasing the conclusion: 1) more chemicals, or 2) more sensitivity to the chemicals

A. I saw this as irrelevant. The number of nurses doesn't matter to establishing a proportion. The main point and conclusion can still be valid even with less nurses.
B. Comparing chemical allergies to other allergies is not within the stated argument. Also irrelevant.
C. This is correct. It offers an alternative explanation of why nurses would see an increase in the number of students sent to them with chemical allergies even if there weren't more chemicals or if the sensitivities had not changed.
D. The location of the exposure to chemicals is not relevant to the argument or conclusion. If D were true and chemicals were commonly used elsewhere, that would actually strengthen argument 1) as a reason for increased exposure.
E. Irrelevant. Schoolchildren to overall population proportion has nothing to do with the passage.
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 340
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 70

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary [#permalink]  17 Apr 2013, 14:28
mun23 wrote:
subhashghosh wrote:
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.

I picked d.Need every options explanation

Hi Mun23.
My pleasure to help.

Premise: exposure to chemical ==> allergic reactions
Premise: the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions increase
Conclusion: more children exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive

Assumption: proportion = children who got allergy and were brought to hospital / Total children.
KEY is "children actually were brought to hospital". If they got allergy and NOT went to hospital, they are not counted.

A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
Wrong. Out of scope.

B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.
Wrong. Out of scope

C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
Correct. This is the assumption above.

D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
Wrong. SHELL GAME. "are NOT used in houses & apartment" DOES NOT MEAN "are used in school". What if the chemical are not commonly used in both school & houses.==> We cannot conclude children exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals.

E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
Wrong. We cannot conclude the number of children increased or decreased, because the proportion also depends on the total population that may increase or decrease.

Hope it helps a little bit.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

Choosing correct answers is not as important as explaining why other answers are wrong. Keep learning everyday!

Re: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary   [#permalink] 17 Apr 2013, 14:28
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary 15 08 Jul 2004, 08:41
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary 6 21 Sep 2004, 04:02
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary 7 03 Jan 2006, 05:05
2 Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary 9 21 Feb 2009, 23:54
Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary 4 10 Dec 2009, 17:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.