Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 04 Aug 2015, 11:05
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 462
Location: Texas
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 87 [1] , given: 20

In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2012, 09:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:50) correct 42% (02:04) wrong based on 195 sessions
In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.
In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?





A. The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.
B The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.
C The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.
D The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main argument's conclusion.
E The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by agdimple333 on 15 Jul 2012, 14:52, edited 1 time in total.
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2641
Followers: 490

Kudos [?]: 3786 [0], given: 727

Re: Bold face - Retail chains [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2012, 15:31
Expert's post
2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 30
Location: Venezuela
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [2] , given: 5

Re: Bold face - Retail chains [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2012, 12:36
2
This post received
KUDOS
I disagree with @carcass.
The correct answer choice is C.
This is how I approach bold face CR questions:

First! Analize the structure of the argument. Identify the premise and the conclusion.
Premise

In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. - an evidence, a trend in the customer behavior
Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth

Conclusion
it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false. main conclusion

because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place. reason supporting the main conclusion .

Now, we can see that the second bold face supports the main conclusion. As a result we can eliminate A, D and E.
Finally, between B and C. The second bold face is a reason that the claim might not be true. By no means the second bold face is supporting the accuracy of the claim. Therefore the answer is C.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 98
Location: Mexico
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V34
GPA: 3.85
WE: Sales (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 3

Re: Bold face - Retail chains [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2012, 12:50
IMO C

The conclusion of the argument is just before the second bolded section. The conclusion refutes the first bolded portion of the argument
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2012
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Bold face - Retail chains [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2012, 13:10
Yep C it is. Can you please share the OA.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: Bold face - Retail chains [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2012, 21:02
The right answer is C .
The second boldface is evidence that the claim MAY be true. The first is the basis of the claim that is refuted in the argument.
1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 822
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 58

Kudos [?]: 320 [1] , given: 43

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Bold face - Retail chains [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2012, 09:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
The easiest way to solve this question is spot the conclusion first. Then, we can easily know the role of the 2nd boldface, supporting the conclusion, or the reason for the claim disputed in the argument.

The 1st, however, is the background or basis for the next sentence, the claim disputed

=> Only choice (C) matches above reasoning.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 564
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 75

Re: Bold face - Retail chains [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2012, 10:29
agdimple333 wrote:
In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.
In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?
A. The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.
B The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.
C The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.
D The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main argument's conclusion.
E The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.


The claim-customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy
The basis of this claim / why this claim occurred? -In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products.

The first part is the basis of the claim.

" ...in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place"
is the actual reason that why THE CLAIM-customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy MIGHT NOT BE TRUE.

(C) wins
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 58
GMAT Date: 09-10-2012
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 14

Re: In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2012, 07:49
C it is. None other qualifies.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4649
Followers: 497

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2015, 06:21
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance   [#permalink] 12 Jul 2015, 06:21
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic It is ludicrous to assert that the math department's new policy, allow PiyushK 6 18 Feb 2015, 11:20
Experts publish their posts in the topic Many retailers advertise price-matching policies, such as, gmatbull 8 12 Nov 2012, 10:44
Child s World, a chain of toy stores, has relied on a sagarsabnis 11 30 Dec 2009, 14:21
2 Paper&Print is a chain of British stores selling lexis 27 14 Jun 2008, 01:16
FastMart, a convenience store chain, is planning to add gregspirited 4 20 Dec 2007, 15:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.