Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

(1) x^2 > y^2. Since both sides are non-negative, then we can safely take the square root: |x| > |y|. Sufficient.

Or: "is |x| > |y|?" can be rewritten as: is x^2 > y^2? (we can safely square the whole inequality since both sides are non-negative). This statement directly answers the question. Sufficient.

(2) x > y. Clearly insufficient: consider x=1 and y=0 for an YES answer and x=1 and y=-2 for a NO answer. Not sufficient.

Re: Is IxI > IyI ? [#permalink]
26 Feb 2013, 02:59

fozzzy wrote:

Is IxI > IyI ? (1) x^2 > y^2 (2) x > y

Please provide explanations. Thanks!

Hi fozzy

when IxI = IyI that implies x^2 = Y^2 hence clearly statement 1 is sufficient

But for statement 2 substitute -ve values for x and y to satisfy the inequality....for -vel values you will get an answer to the question at hand ....but for +ve value it will be a definite yes......hence statement 2 is insufficient. Moreover when IxI = I yI ,than either x = -y or y = -x.........

To find out the sufficiency for the problem statement,

Option 1: x^2 > y^2

Quick (and dirty) method : to look for the cases where the option would lead to contradictory or insufficient conclusions to the problem statement

Looking at modulus function, one can verify by checking the inequality scenario in positive and negative domains. Using values i) x= 5,y=4 ii) x=-5,y=4 iii) x=-5,y=-4 iv) x= 5,y=-4 , all such cases would lead to a definitive conclusion on inequality |x|>|y|

Otherwise also, x^2 > y^2 => |x|*|x|>|y|*|y| => |x| > |y| .. taking sq. root of both sides(which are positive)

SO, 1st option is sufficient

Option 2 : x > y Quick (and dirty) method

Using values i) x = 5, y = -6 ii) x = 5 , y = 4 , both give different conclusions on inequality |x|>|y|

To find out the sufficiency for the problem statement,

Option 1: x^2 > y^2

Quick (and dirty) method : to look for the cases where the option would lead to contradictory or insufficient conclusions to the problem statement

Looking at modulus function, one can verify by checking the inequality scenario in positive and negative domains. Using values i) x= 5,y=4 ii) x=-5,y=4 iii) x=-5,y=-4 iv) x= 5,y=-4 , all such cases would lead to a definitive conclusion on inequality |x|>|y|

Otherwise also, x^2 > y^2 => |x|*|x|>|y|*|y| => |x| > |y| .. taking sq. root of both sides(which are positive)

SO, 1st option is sufficient

Option 2 : x > y Quick (and dirty) method

Using values i) x = 5, y = -6 ii) x = 5 , y = 4 , both give different conclusions on inequality |x|>|y|

Interested in applying for an MBA? In the fourth and final part of our live QA series with guest expert Chioma Isiadinso, co-founder of consultancy Expartus and former admissions...