Last visit was: 18 Apr 2025, 00:28 It is currently 18 Apr 2025, 00:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
dvinoth86
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Last visit: 06 Dec 2015
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
1,299
 [125]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
Posts: 87
Kudos: 1,299
 [125]
25
Kudos
Add Kudos
98
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 April 2025
Posts: 100,740
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,107
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,740
Kudos: 717,303
 [38]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
WholeLottaLove
Joined: 13 May 2013
Last visit: 13 Jan 2014
Posts: 306
Own Kudos:
612
 [5]
Given Kudos: 134
Posts: 306
Kudos: 612
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
GyanOne
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Last visit: 16 Apr 2025
Posts: 3,205
Own Kudos:
1,648
 [2]
Given Kudos: 33
Status: World Rank #4 MBA Admissions Consultant
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,205
Kudos: 1,648
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1: x^2 > y^2 => |x| > |y|. Sufficient.
Statement 2: x>y. If x>0 and y>0 then x>y implies |x|>|y|. If x<0 and y<0 then x>y implies |x|<|y|. Insufficient.

A it is.
User avatar
gmatacequants
Joined: 13 May 2014
Last visit: 03 Sep 2019
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
247
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Posts: 26
Kudos: 247
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To find out the sufficiency for the problem statement,

Option 1:
x^2 > y^2

Quick (and dirty) method : to look for the cases where the option would lead to contradictory or insufficient conclusions to the problem statement

Looking at modulus function, one can verify by checking the inequality scenario in positive and negative domains.
Using values
i) x= 5,y=4
ii) x=-5,y=4
iii) x=-5,y=-4
iv) x= 5,y=-4 ,
all such cases would lead to a definitive conclusion on inequality |x|>|y|

Otherwise also, x^2 > y^2
=> |x|*|x|>|y|*|y|
=> |x| > |y| .. taking sq. root of both sides(which are positive)

SO, 1st option is sufficient


Option 2 :
x > y
Quick (and dirty) method

Using values
i) x = 5, y = -6
ii) x = 5 , y = 4 ,
both give different conclusions on inequality |x|>|y|

SO, 2nd option is insufficient

correct option is
Kudos is the best form of appreciation
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,309
Own Kudos:
262
 [2]
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,309
Kudos: 262
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is |x| > |y|?

(1) x^2 > y^2. Since both sides are non-negative, then we can safely take the square root: |x| > |y|. Sufficient.

Or: "is |x| > |y|?" can be rewritten as: is x^2 > y^2? (we can safely square the whole inequality since both sides are non-negative). This statement directly answers the question. Sufficient.

(2) x > y. Clearly insufficient: consider x=1 and y=0 for an YES answer and x=1 and y=-2 for a NO answer. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hi Bunuel --
For S1 -- can you please elaborate the theory re: why

if x^2 > y^2 -- that implies |x| > |y|

I can memorize this but i would like to understand logically the theory behind something like. How would one make this assumption logically without memorizing this information ?

I have tested a few test cases and this is true -- but logically or on a number line -- how does one make sense of this theory ? [ x^2 > y^2 -- implies |x| > |y| ]

For example -- why does |x| > |y| NOT imply x^3 > y^3 but x^2 > y^2

Thank you !
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 April 2025
Posts: 100,740
Own Kudos:
717,303
 [2]
Given Kudos: 93,107
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,740
Kudos: 717,303
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is |x| > |y|?

(1) x^2 > y^2. Since both sides are non-negative, then we can safely take the square root: |x| > |y|. Sufficient.

Or: "is |x| > |y|?" can be rewritten as: is x^2 > y^2? (we can safely square the whole inequality since both sides are non-negative). This statement directly answers the question. Sufficient.

(2) x > y. Clearly insufficient: consider x=1 and y=0 for an YES answer and x=1 and y=-2 for a NO answer. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hi Bunuel --
For S1 -- can you please elaborate the theory re: why

if x^2 > y^2 -- that implies |x| > |y|

I can memorize this but i would like to understand logically the theory behind something like. How would one make this assumption logically without memorizing this information ?

I have tested a few test cases and this is true -- but logically or on a number line -- how does one make sense of this theory ? [ x^2 > y^2 -- implies |x| > |y| ]

Since both side of the inequality are non-negative, then we can safely take the square root to get \(\sqrt{x^2} > \sqrt{y^2}\). Next, since \(\sqrt{a^2}=|a|\), then \(\sqrt{x^2} > \sqrt{y^2}\) gives |x| > |y|.
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 17 Apr 2025
Posts: 5,579
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,579
Kudos: 4,958
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dvinoth86
Is |x| > |y|?

(1) x^2 > y^2
(2) x > y

Asked: Is |x| > |y|?

(1) x^2 > y^2
|x| > |y|
SUFFICIENT

(2) x > y
If x = 3; y = - 4; |x| = 3 < |y| = 4
But if x = 4; y = 3; |x| = 4 > |y| = 3
NOT SUFFICIENT

IMO A
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,309
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,309
Kudos: 262
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
karishma Bunuel - I was trying to do this DS problem via testing cases as this is a Yes / No question

I attempted S2 first as its easier

Question on S1

Does it make sense for a test taker to try to use the same test cases once again that they used in the other statement ? (assuming the restrictions in this test case allow for it )

I think it might because in case both S1 and S2 are both INS

I think you have a ready-made case which is applicable for S1 and S2 when testing for C or E specifically

but just wanted your thoughts !

Thank you !
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,309
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,309
Kudos: 262
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel .. Can you answer my question when you have a moment

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Lazybum
Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Last visit: 28 Apr 2022
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 30
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V41
Posts: 70
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Bunuel
Is |x| > |y|?

(1) x^2 > y^2. Since both sides are non-negative, then we can safely take the square root: |x| > |y|. Sufficient.

Or: "is |x| > |y|?" can be rewritten as: is x^2 > y^2? (we can safely square the whole inequality since both sides are non-negative). This statement directly answers the question. Sufficient.

(2) x > y. Clearly insufficient: consider x=1 and y=0 for an YES answer and x=1 and y=-2 for a NO answer. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hi Bunuel --
For S1 -- can you please elaborate the theory re: why

if x^2 > y^2 -- that implies |x| > |y|

I can memorize this but i would like to understand logically the theory behind something like. How would one make this assumption logically without memorizing this information ?

I have tested a few test cases and this is true -- but logically or on a number line -- how does one make sense of this theory ? [ x^2 > y^2 -- implies |x| > |y| ]

Since both side of the inequality are non-negative, then we can safely take the square root to get \(\sqrt{x^2} > \sqrt{y^2}\). Next, since \(\sqrt{a^2}=|a|\), then \(\sqrt{x^2} > \sqrt{y^2}\) gives |x| > |y|.

does anyone know why this is "not negative" as bunuel pointed out? oh actually nvm, its a fundamental identity that if you square a number, it always is greater than or equal to 0.
i tried to solve this question differently but it didnt work, does anyone understand why?

I used the "critical method" cited by bunuel, here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-mod ... 10849.html
i listed out all the scenarios
x > y when x>0 and y>0
-x > y when x<0 and y>0
x > -y when x>0 and y<0
-x > -y when x<0 and y<0

this just doesn't work and i'm confused why.
User avatar
BLTN
Joined: 25 Aug 2020
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 246
Own Kudos:
208
 [1]
Given Kudos: 216
Posts: 246
Kudos: 208
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lazybum
Bunuel
Is |x| > |y|?

(1) x^2 > y^2. Since both sides are non-negative, then we can safely take the square root: |x| > |y|. Sufficient.

Or: "is |x| > |y|?" can be rewritten as: is x^2 > y^2? (we can safely square the whole inequality since both sides are non-negative). This statement directly answers the question. Sufficient.

(2) x > y. Clearly insufficient: consider x=1 and y=0 for an YES answer and x=1 and y=-2 for a NO answer. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hi Bunuel --
For S1 -- can you please elaborate the theory re: why

if x^2 > y^2 -- that implies |x| > |y|

I can memorize this but i would like to understand logically the theory behind something like. How would one make this assumption logically without memorizing this information ?

I have tested a few test cases and this is true -- but logically or on a number line -- how does one make sense of this theory ? [ x^2 > y^2 -- implies |x| > |y| ]

Since both side of the inequality are non-negative, then we can safely take the square root to get \(\sqrt{x^2} > \sqrt{y^2}\). Next, since \(\sqrt{a^2}=|a|\), then \(\sqrt{x^2} > \sqrt{y^2}\) gives |x| > |y|.

does anyone know why this is "not negative" as bunuel pointed out? oh actually nvm, its a fundamental identity that if you square a number, it always is greater than or equal to 0.
i tried to solve this question differently but it didnt work, does anyone understand why?

I used the "critical method" cited by bunuel, here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-mod ... 10849.html
i listed out all the scenarios
x > y when x>0 and y>0
-x > y when x<0 and y>0
x > -y when x>0 and y<0
-x > -y when x<0 and y<0

this just doesn't work and i'm confused why.[/quote]

Dear Lazybum
the values are non-negative because you cannot take square root from the negative value.
Even if the X = -2 then the (-2)^2= 4 and \(\sqrt{4} \)= 2 not the - 2

The question is asking is the absolute value of X grate then the absolute value of Y
2d statement gives you variables X and Y in lieu of Absolute variables.
User avatar
PriyamRathor
Joined: 17 Aug 2021
Last visit: 24 May 2024
Posts: 152
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 167
Location: India
WE:Corporate Finance (Accounting)
Posts: 152
Kudos: 113
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dvinoth86
Is |x| > |y|?

(1) x^2 > y^2
(2) x > y

Hello chetan2u gmatphobia ,

I did S1 in some other way.

S1 \(x^2 >y^2\)

\(x^2-y^2>0\)
(x-y) (x+y)>0
Hence,

x>y and x>-y

Lets take x>-y

Say 1>-2 -------------> Now when we put this in Question Stem |1| > |-2| which implies |1| >|2| ------ Not possible

Hence S1 is not sufficient.

Please guide.

Regards
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 17 Apr 2025
Posts: 11,323
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 11,323
Kudos: 40,134
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PriyamRathor
dvinoth86
Is |x| > |y|?

(1) x^2 > y^2
(2) x > y

Hello chetan2u gmatphobia ,

I did S1 in some other way.

S1 \(x^2 >y^2\)

\(x^2-y^2>0\)
(x-y) (x+y)>0
Hence,

x>y and x>-y

Lets take x>-y

Say 1>-2 -------------> Now when we put this in Question Stem |1| > |-2| which implies |1| >|2| ------ Not possible

Hence S1 is not sufficient.

Please guide.

Regards

(x-y)(x+y)>0 means both x-y and x+y have same sign.
1) Both positive: x>y and x>-y. This means x>|y|
2) Both negative: x<y and x<-y. This means x<y<0<-y. This means x is farther away from 0 as compared to y. |x|>|y|
Sufficient
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 36,907
Own Kudos:
Posts: 36,907
Kudos: 971
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
100740 posts