Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 11:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 101 [2] , given: 0

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1 [#permalink] New post 14 Dec 2004, 05:25
2
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (02:08) correct 33% (01:18) wrong based on 342 sessions
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

(A) It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars
(B) it fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth
(C) It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

Note: There are two questions available with the similar stimulus and same first line but different question. The other question (complete the passage) is discussed in: it-is-theoretically-possible-that-bacteria-developed-on-q2-46449.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 908
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2004, 17:12
chun, could you please post the OA to this question? I am leaning towards C
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 96
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2004, 17:48
I would also pick D. The argument fails to condisder whether all bacteria came from Mars...
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 709
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2008, 04:33
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.



The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?


A. It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars.

B. It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth.

C. It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.

D. It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.

E. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2008, 04:47
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.
The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

A. It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars. irrevelant
B. It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth. irrevelant
C. It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth. irrevelant
D. It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
The argument reports about 'strains of bacteria from different planets'
E. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.
It could well be that all the bacteria living on Earth derived from Mars and the bacteria from Earth died out! Correct answer!

Cheers,
2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 759
Location: Oxford
Schools: Oxford'10
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 178 [2] , given: 8

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2008, 05:03
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
prasannar wrote:
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.



The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?


A. It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars. The argument says "even ig bacteria did arrive on earth", so this point is irrelevant since we are assuming Mars had bacteria and it got to earth.

B. It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth. Again, we have to assume that bacteria got transported to earth, since this is the basis of the argument.

C. It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth. its irrelevant how Martian bacteria got to earth.

D. It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria. The argument says that martian bacteria that arrived on earth died out. But this choice makes it possible that martian bacteria thrived on earth and didn't die out.

E. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out. this is irrelevant since we are trying to find out something that is against it arguement, i.e martian bacteria died out. This statement says nothing about martian bacteria
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2008, 00:17
Any other thoughts? D or E? What is OA?

cheers,
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2995
Followers: 57

Kudos [?]: 443 [0], given: 210

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2008, 04:28
I agree with D. Will explain further if its correct. I must say its a nasty one - both E and D do sound plausible.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 464
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 6

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2008, 07:28
Well I would go with D .
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2008, 07:41
I would go with E.

D talks abt spawning of an Earth-version bacteria from the Martian one. In tht case they would have the same biological/DNA/RNA (blah blah :shock:) structure.. E is correct as it explores a possibility of the existence of a pure-Earth-version (born & brought up on earth :D) which would be biologically different from the martian version.

Hence E.. :D

Any counter arguments??

the stigscousin
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 464
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 6

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2008, 09:32
whats the OA?
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2008, 10:01
E

If e is true, then there were bacteria with different enough in protien structure, it is just that they died out. This means we cant determine if the bacteria are from mars or not. I didt pick d because stem says bacteria on earth exist

prasannar wrote:
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.



The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?


A. It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars.

B. It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth.

C. It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.

D. It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.

E. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2008, 12:59
A- hmm..
B-irrelevant to arg
C-irrelevant
D-irrelevant
E-hmm..

To summarize&confirm: What is the arg ? "even if the bac arrived frm MArs, they must have died "
LOok at A and E now...E hints that bac developed on earth might hv died !..and bac frm Mars survived ..
possible! Next, A is true as fact but A doesn't weaken the arg ..arg scope is: bac developed on Mars: may or may not but if they did, then they must have died on earth ( given the fact that structurally totally diff bac cant exist) which E negates..


I go with E


I found this a lil tricky!!

prasannar wrote:
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.



The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?


A. It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars.

B. It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth.

C. It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.

D. It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.

E. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1443
Schools: Chicago Booth '11
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 12

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2008, 13:14
E

Argument is making a conclusion that since all earth bacteria are not different enough they couldn't have arose from another planet.

However the argument fails to consider if previous strains of bacteria on earth that were different enough to have arose from another did exist on earth. (but died out which is why they are not around today)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 30:19/30 [#permalink] New post 09 Apr 2008, 06:52
What is OA?

Cheers,
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 78
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 3

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2009, 00:56
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.
The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
A. It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars.
B. It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth.
C. It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
D. It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
E. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 234 [0], given: 18

Re: Bacteria from Mars [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2009, 01:32
D.

Conclusion: Since there is only one type of bacteria on earth, Martian bacteria has died out ( implies that all bacteria on Earth are the ones that originated on Earth )

There might be a possibility that all bacteria on Earth died out and so current strain of bacteria on Earth is the one that came from Mars. D brings out this flaw.

ankur55 wrote:
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.
The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
A. It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars.
B. It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth.
C. It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
D. It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
E. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 78
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 3

Re: Bacteria from Mars [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2009, 01:38
thanks for the explanation.
D is the correct answer.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 805
Location: New Delhi
WE 1: 5.5 yrs in IT
Followers: 64

Kudos [?]: 415 [0], given: 56

Re: Bacteria from Mars [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2009, 01:40
D.

Evidence: All bacteria on earth is from "one source"
Conclusion: bacteria from Mars have died out.

Author seems to have assumed that this "one source" is "earth". Option D directly attacks this assumption, by saying that all the bacteria from earth have died. So this "one source" must be Mars.
_________________

ISB 2011-12 thread | Ask ISB Alumni @ ThinkISB
All information related to Indian candidates and B-schools | Indian B-schools accepting GMAT scores
Self evaluation for Why MBA?

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 160
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 11

Re: Bacteria from Mars [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2009, 01:00
+1 for D
Re: Bacteria from Mars   [#permalink] 23 Jul 2009, 01:00
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars raviram80 0 01 Mar 2012, 02:30
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars nifoui 0 25 Dec 2010, 07:43
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars ankur55 0 06 Mar 2011, 21:43
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars prasannar 0 09 Apr 2008, 06:52
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q2 Jamesk486 12 01 Jun 2007, 15:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on - Q1

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 43 posts ] 



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.