Last visit was: 16 Jul 2025, 00:33 It is currently 16 Jul 2025, 00:33
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
chunjuwu
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Last visit: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 541
Own Kudos:
4,740
 [143]
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 541
Kudos: 4,740
 [143]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
124
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
buffdaddy
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Last visit: 13 Jan 2011
Posts: 546
Own Kudos:
301
 [33]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: Oxford
Schools:Oxford'10
 Q49  V37
Posts: 546
Kudos: 301
 [33]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Economist
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Last visit: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
4,400
 [10]
Given Kudos: 18
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Posts: 383
Kudos: 4,400
 [10]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sureshbala
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Last visit: 04 Apr 2005
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Posts: 17
Kudos: 8
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would also pick D. The argument fails to condisder whether all bacteria came from Mars...
User avatar
bigoyal
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Last visit: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 577
Own Kudos:
2,382
 [5]
Given Kudos: 56
Location: New Delhi
Concentration: IT Consultancy
 Q50  V38
WE 1: 5.5 yrs in IT
Posts: 577
Kudos: 2,382
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D.

Evidence: All bacteria on earth is from "one source"
Conclusion: bacteria from Mars have died out.

Author seems to have assumed that this "one source" is "earth". Option D directly attacks this assumption, by saying that all the bacteria from earth have died. So this "one source" must be Mars.
User avatar
ichha148
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Last visit: 23 Feb 2023
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
486
 [5]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 135
Kudos: 486
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. Premise However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacteria strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. Counter -premise
So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out. - conclusion


Weaken question - find the choice that weakens the conclusion

A: It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars - no where related to conclusion ,also author says theoretically possible

B: It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth no where related to conclusion ,also author says meteroite
C: It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth -no where related to conclusion

D: It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria - correct ,if the bacteria on earth are arisen from mars bacteria that means mars bacteria did not die

E: It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out
-no where related to conclusion

In weaken questions - look for the answer choices that attack the conclusion
User avatar
maddy2u
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Last visit: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Status:I am Midnight's Child !
GPA: 8.7
WE 1: Software Design and Development
Posts: 60
Kudos: 401
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nifoui
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacteria strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticism:
A: It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars
B: It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth
C: It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth
D: It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria
E: It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out

OA =
:done
Answer is D IMO . Reason is that the argument is based on the assumption that bacteria existed on earth prior to the skirmish with meteorites carrying Martian bacteria stains. D significantly weakens the conclusion "even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out" .
User avatar
tuanquang269
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Last visit: 18 May 2018
Posts: 376
Own Kudos:
1,632
 [2]
Given Kudos: 44
Status:Flying over the cloud!
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Products:
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
raviram80
Question 11: (W) It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out. The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
E. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

I will deeply explain only the correct choice because I'm seating at the office and do not have more time to do so.

First, the conclusion of the argument: If bacteria on Earth from Mars, they must died out.

The premise: Strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time

No two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets.

If we insert choice E in side YES, the bacteria origin from Earth died out, then the bacteria from Mars develop. The conclusion is broken.

In side NO, reversely, the conclusion is secured.
avatar
karun0109
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Last visit: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
87
 [3]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Posts: 49
Kudos: 87
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I go with D.

the contention made by the author is that since all bacteria on earth are not different enough to have arisen from different planets, any bacteria that may have come from mars must have died out. D refutes this by suggesting the possibility that all the bacteria we see today could be from mars and that the bacteria that originated on earth could have died out. Hence D is correct

Problems with others:

A: Unrelated
B: Unrelated
C: Unrelated
E: Even if some strains of bacteria that originated on earth did die out, this does not preclude the martian strains from dying out leaving some strains that originated on Earth. Note that the statement does not say all bacteria that originated from Earth died out, like D does.. which is what we need.
avatar
ellenhch
Joined: 16 Jun 2013
Last visit: 01 Jan 2015
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Marketing
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I picked E and realized why it's wrong. Who cares about strains of bacteria that originated on Earth? I picked this because I was thinking, oh well if the strains on earth died out, the bacteria that is from Mars MAY be comparable...but who cares? The conclusion is saying, so if bacteria DID come from Mars, it probably died out. D is the best choice because maybe the bacteria now IS from Mars...therefore it didn't die out (and we are assuming that the bacteria here is from Earth instead).
User avatar
Practicegmat
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Last visit: 16 Dec 2014
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 166
Status:Time to apply!
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
Posts: 94
Kudos: 504
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
still I have conusion with (d) and (e)

Could anyone explain why (d) is wrong
Regards
User avatar
pqhai
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Last visit: 26 Nov 2015
Posts: 868
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Posts: 868
Kudos: 8,828
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Practicegmat
still I have conusion with (d) and (e)

Could anyone explain why (d) is wrong
Regards

Hi Practicegmat.

I think your question is wrong cause D is correct. Probably, your question is "why E is wrong?" if that's true, so this is my explanation.

Conclusion is: if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out because no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets.

What should we attack? We weaken the conclusion by showing that all bacteria on Earth now were transported to Earth from Mars and NOT died out later.

But (E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.


E does not attack the conclusion at all. There would be the case that some bacteria originated on Earth died out later and bacteria transported from Mars to Earth also died out.

Hence E is incorrect.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
jaituteja
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Last visit: 16 Jan 2015
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Posts: 79
Kudos: 174
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chunjuwu
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

(A) It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars
(B) it fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth
(C) It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

Note: There are two questions available with the similar stimulus and same first line but different question. The other question (complete the passage) is discussed in: it-is-theoretically-possible-that-bacteria-developed-on-q2-46449.html

Whats wrong with D and E...

Can someone explain...?
User avatar
pqhai
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Last visit: 26 Nov 2015
Posts: 868
Own Kudos:
8,828
 [2]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Posts: 868
Kudos: 8,828
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jaituteja
chunjuwu
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

(A) It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars
(B) it fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth
(C) It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

Note: There are two questions available with the similar stimulus and same first line but different question. The other question (complete the passage) is discussed in: it-is-theoretically-possible-that-bacteria-developed-on-q2-46449.html

Whats wrong with D and E...

Can someone explain...?

Hi jaituteja

I'm glad to help.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: strains of bacteria from different planets  have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time.
Fact: NO two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets
Conclusion: if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

Assumption: There is NOT ANY CASE that all bacterial strains on Earth came from Mars. Because if All bacterial on Earth originated from Mars ==> we CANNOT compare bacteria from Mars with bacteria on Earth to make conclusion, because they are the same.

D and E, which one is correct?

(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
Correct. It attacks the conclusion by demonstrating the case that all bacterial strains on Earth actually traveled to Earth from Mars. we CANNOT compare bacteria from Mars with bacteria on Earth, because they are the same.

(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.
Wrong. E does not weaken the point “all bacteria arrived on Earth from Mars must have died out” at all. Don’t go too FAR. You CANNOT assume that “strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out” = all bacteria living on Earth arrived from Mars. Because there would be the case that some bacteria originated form Earth died out later, but others still alive. Therefore, the conclusion based on the comparison MAY BE valid ==> You cannot weaken the conclusion by using E. That's why E differs from D.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
joshnsit
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Oct 2017
Posts: 238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Posts: 238
Kudos: 1,361
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jaituteja
chunjuwu
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

(A) It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars
(B) it fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth
(C) It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

Note: There are two questions available with the similar stimulus and same first line but different question. The other question (complete the passage) is discussed in: it-is-theoretically-possible-that-bacteria-developed-on-q2-46449.html

Whats wrong with D and E...

Can someone explain...?
This is one of the most twister questions I have seen on GMAT. But not because of logic but sentence construction. I would have been scratching for long in understanding the meaning. Lets deconstruct.

Fact 1: It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite.

Fact 2: However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and
Not of much significance

Fact3: no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets.
It looked like an SC question to me for first 20 times I looked at it. But, guess GMAT is all about persistence
Let us first remove this "no" from beginning to understand the meaning: "two bacterial strains on Earth are different"
Now place "not" after "are": "two bacterial strains on Earth are not different"

So, this sentence basically says that bacterial strains on earth are so same that they must be of only one origin.

Conclusion: So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.
Bacteria from Mars, if on earth, must have died out.

Summary: We can have only one source for all bacteria on earth. So all bacteria from Mars, if reached earth, would have died out on earth.

What will weaken this? Bacteria from Mars didn't die.
D says exactly that.

E says that earth bacteria died out. It is extra information but doesnt deal with Martian bacteria(which is part of conclusion)

Correct me if this line of thinking looks wrong..
User avatar
warrior1991
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Last visit: 03 Feb 2022
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 596
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
Products:
Posts: 573
Kudos: 433
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

Conclusion :- Even if bacteria originated from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument makes above conclusion on the basis that strains of bacteria from different planets would have substantial differences in protein structure and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

Quote:
(A) It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars
Note:- In final conclusion argument agrees that bacteria may have arrived on Earth from Mars. We are not talking about whether it was developed or not on Mars.
Irrelevant


Quote:
(B) it fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth
Note:- In final conclusion argument agrees that bacteria may have arrived on Earth from Mars.So this option is not the contention here.
Out of Scope.


Quote:
(C) It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
We are not considering by what means bacteria were transported to earth.Irrelevant

Quote:
(D) It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
This may weaken the conclusion. All bacteria that now are there on earth may be transported from Mars. They are of same protein structure. Hence the author conclusion will be weakened. Bingo

Quote:
(E) It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.
So some bacteria originated on Earth and later died out. We are still not getting as to why Mars bacteria died out even if they were successful in reaching earth. Does this option gives us the reason to weaken the conclusion above.? NO
Therefore we can cross it out as well.
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 429
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 429
Kudos: 92
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hi ,
can anyone help clarify "no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. " ?

it is hard for me to understand.

thanks ini advance.
User avatar
mallya12
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Last visit: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93
Posts: 125
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
confusion between D and E.

I understand D weakens the conclusion. But to give E a thought, it is possible that all the strains of bacteria originated in earth die out, and thus the remaining ones are from Mars, doesn't that weaken the conclusion as well.
User avatar
DavidTutorexamPAL
User avatar
examPAL Representative
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Last visit: 09 Sep 2020
Posts: 1,035
Own Kudos:
1,950
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 1,035
Kudos: 1,950
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mallya12
confusion between D and E.

I understand D weakens the conclusion. But to give E a thought, it is possible that all the strains of bacteria originated in earth die out, and thus the remaining ones are from Mars, doesn't that weaken the conclusion as well.

This is a pretty original thought :) A bit too original for the GMAT though...
While this is logically true,
It is very very very unlikely that ALL strains of bacteria on earth would die out.
And thus, this specific scenario doesn't weaken the argument very much - certainly less than D does.
User avatar
DavidTutorexamPAL
User avatar
examPAL Representative
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Last visit: 09 Sep 2020
Posts: 1,035
Own Kudos:
1,950
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 1,035
Kudos: 1,950
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zoezhuyan
hi ,
can anyone help clarify "no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. " ?

it is hard for me to understand.

thanks ini advance.

The argument is saying that all of the existing bacteria on earth is similar - too similar for any of it have come from another planet
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7357 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts