Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 20:09 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 20:09

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2014
Status:I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Posts: 474
Own Kudos [?]: 38840 [545]
Given Kudos: 220
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE:Business Development (Real Estate)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28575 [90]
Given Kudos: 130
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14675 [62]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 680
Own Kudos [?]: 1763 [59]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
49
Kudos
10
Bookmarks
AbdurRakib wrote:
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided
B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided
C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided
D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides


OG 2017 New Question


Making things even more difficult lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided. 'Which' refers to paralysis.
B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided 'there' refers to what?
C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided Making things even more difficult general market inactivity. No verb is used.
D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides. which refers to paralysis
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 6818
Own Kudos [?]: 29942 [10]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
6
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
AbdurRakib wrote:
GMAT® Official Guide 2018

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 726
Page: 691

Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

(A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided
(B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided
(C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided
(D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
(E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides



(A) Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

if not paralysis is an interjection. It adds color to the sentence.
which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance is a modifier. It tells us more about INACTIVITY
If we ignore the interjection and the modifier, we get: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately

Here's a similar sentence: Standing on the corner has been Joe.
While we can say Joe has been standing on the corner, the sentence Standing on the corner has been Joe illogically makes the modifier (Standing on the corner) the subject of the sentence.
Answer choice A shares the same illogical construction.
ELIMINATE A
------------------------------------

Answer choice B is a total word salad. I doubt many students choose B :)
------------------------------------

(E)Making things even more difficult is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides little in the way of pricing guidance.

if not paralysis is an interjection. It adds color to the sentence.
which provides little in the way of pricing guidance. is a modifier. It tells us more about INACTIVITY
If we ignore the interjection and the modifier, we get: Making things even more difficult is that lately general market inactivity
This sentence is incomplete. Where's the verb that should accompany the noun ACTIVITY?
ELIMINATE E
------------------------------------

We're left with C and D

With answer choice D we get: Making things even more difficult lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.
Here, we start with a modifier Making things even more difficult lately,,
When a sentence begins with a with noun modifier (as it does in the above sentence), stop at the comma and ask the question that the modifier raises.

So, once we read, Making things even more difficult lately, we should stop and ask . . . WHAT is making things more difficult lately?
Keep reading.... general market inactivity
Ah! general market inactivity is making thing more difficult.
Make perfect sense
Keep D.


With answer choice C we get: Making things even more difficult general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

It LOOKS like we're starting the sentence with the modifier Making things even more difficult but the omission of a comma tells us that this, alone, is not the modifier.
Keep going until the comma...."Making things even more difficult general market inactivity, "
What?!?!
ELIMINATE C


Answer: D

Cheers,
Brent
General Discussion
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11181
Own Kudos [?]: 31969 [6]
Given Kudos: 291
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
4
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
AbdurRakib wrote:
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided
B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided
C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided
D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides


OG 2017 New Question


Issues -



1) Making things even more difficult MODIFIES general market inactivity , so should be followed by it..
2) Pronoun error - general market inactivity REQUIRES a verb...


BOTH above error are corrected ONLY by D

D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 170 [4]
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
AbdurRakib wrote:
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided
B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided
C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided
D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides


OG 2017 New Question



Intention of the sentence is to convey that General market inactivity are making things difficult, if not causing paralysis, and this whole thing has resulted in providing little for pricing guidance.
Subject of this entire sentence is General Market inactivity.
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided -> use of which wrongly refers to “paralysis” that is not what sentence means.
B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided => Making things even more difficult there is general market inactivity =>: no verb, no sense of connectivity and then new sentence start just like that.
C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided => Same error
D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Status:MBA Admissions Consultant
Affiliations: MBA Prep Coach
Posts: 3700
Own Kudos [?]: 1425 [19]
Given Kudos: 570
Location: United States
Farrell Nelson: MBA
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
13
Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
I generally go right to the answer choices. I notice there is a lot of variation in the word lately. What makes sense? Where is it supposed to go? Difficult lately (D) is the only option that has a logical placement of the word lately. A and E would need to say “recent general market inactivity,” all the other placements are totally nonsensical or unclear as to what it refers.

To give an alternative explanation.

-We have *market inactivity* in B/D/E that we can compare to *paralysis*.

-Market inactivity lately in A. Cannot compare market inactivity “lately” to paralysis. Elim A

-This is an illustration of what I call the fork concept. The verb "provided" needs to be the handle and "market activity" & "paralysis" are the prongs.
For this reason, we need the verb directly after market activity & paralysis. No clear antecedent for “it” either. Elim B

- In C, has lately provided little in the way of guidance makes it sound like a contrast with formerly providing lots of guidance. Also, "even more difficult general activity," makes no sense.

-E would need to say “recent general market inactivity,” here is sounds like “lately” is a type of general market inactivity

-D gets the *lately* issue sorted and the activity vs. paralysis issue is a clean comparison
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2100
Own Kudos [?]: 8811 [4]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.
A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided
B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided
C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided
D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides

A- which should be next to general market inactivity
B- Run on sentence - 2 independent clauses joined by comma
C- Initial modifier "Making things more difficult " should be followed by a comma
E- not a sentence

Answer D
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 51 [0]
Given Kudos: 163
Location: Australia
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
AbdurRakib wrote:
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided
B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided
C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided
D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides


OG 2017 New Question



Hi mikemcgarry

I am having difficulty in getting my head around this one; I would really appreciate if you could give your expert explanation.

In D

D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided

What I can understand, D is a succinct version of the following sentence

Making things even more difficult lately (is) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, (which) has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

Where the words I added in parentheses are omitted. Effectively,

“general market inactivity” is the subject
“if not paralysis”, is a non-essential modifier, making it possible to defy modifier touch rule and allowing “(which) has provided little in the way…” to refer back to the subject of the sentence.


If my understanding is not correct then, well, this one is too hard for me and it is time for me to move on.

Your time is appreciated.

Cheers
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Posts: 133
Own Kudos [?]: 272 [1]
Given Kudos: 317
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
1
Kudos
TheRzS wrote:

Hi mikemcgarry

I am having difficulty in getting my head around this one; I would really appreciate if you could give your expert explanation.

In D


Here is D:
Making things even more difficult lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.
Making things even more difficult lately - present participle modifier, referring the preceding subject "general market inactivity" and acting as an adverb for the main action "has provided...",
general market inactivity,if not paralysis, has provided little in the way of pricing guidance - the main clause.

TheRzS wrote:
D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided

What I can understand, D is a succinct version of the following sentence

Making things even more difficult lately (is) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, (which) has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

Where the words I added in parentheses are omitted. Effectively,

“general market inactivity” is the subject
“if not paralysis”, is a non-essential modifier, making it possible to defy modifier touch rule and allowing “(which) has provided little in the way…” to refer back to the subject of the sentence.

We cannot omit the main finite verb in such scenario, specially in the main clause - there are cases when we can do so, for instance in ellipses or in verbless clause, but not here. Moreover, also note that there is a comma after "lately" in D, and your version of D does not consider that.

In addition to the above, considering "general market inactivity" as a noun predicate alters the meaning too/illogical meaning, but as you are concerned only with the structure, I am not discussing the meaning aspect.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 172
Own Kudos [?]: 149 [1]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided

B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided
--> wordy and awkward.

C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided
--> two adjectives difficult general are not properly joined.

D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
--> correct.

E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides
--> fragment.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2017
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 32 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided - "which" refers to paralysis + "has been" is not required I believe because it says "lately"
B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided - complete mess, "it" refers to what is not clear + "general market inactivity lately.." not a valid sentence
C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided - missing comma b/w ".. difficult" and "general market .."
D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided - CORRECT.. "general market inactivity" is rightly placed
E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides - this goes in present tense but we are talking present perfect + "which" refers to paralysis
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
AbdurRakib wrote:
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided
B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided
C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided
D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides


OG 2017 New Question


Hello GMATNinja

Although I dont find any error in D but I'm having a little trouble understanding why option C is wrong. I would really appreciate if you could give your expert replies.

As per the above posts I see that option C does not have a verb, but if I cancel out the modifier (as it's rightly placed) and then read the rest of the sentence as a whole I find a verb 'has' in it. So in option C why do I need a verb in the initial phase i.e. 'Making things even more difficult general market inactivity'.
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14675 [6]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
5
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Hi Deepit,

Thank you for your question! Let's tackle what the issues are with answer C. To make this easier to explain, I'm going to add in answer C to the original sentence:

Making things even more difficult general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

The main problem here is that we have no subject. We have two modifiers and a verb phrase:

Modifier #1: Making things even more difficult general market inactivity
(This is also a problem because, as a phrase, it doesn't sound right. It sounds like a run-on.)

Modifier #2: if not paralysis

Verb Phrase: has lately provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

If you were to write this sentence out in your own writing, the easiest way to fix it would be to put a comma after the word "difficult," which sets apart the subject "general market inactivity" instead of lumping it in with the modifier. However, they didn't give you that option, so it's unfortunately wrong.

I hope this helps!
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2100
Own Kudos [?]: 8811 [0]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
AbdurRakib wrote:
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

(A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided
(B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided
(C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided
(D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
(E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides


Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

The original option is an inverted sentence and can be changed as -
General market inactivity, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance, has been making things even more difficult lately.

If we have a sentence structure "X is(or was) Y".
-If anything before the verb can be the subject, then that's the subject.
- If nothing before the verb can be the subject, then we have a backward construction/ inverted structure (in which subject follows the verb)

On the table are two cell phones --> Two cell phones are on the table ---> I just changed the order and since the sentence is simple -- it's easy

Can we convert a sentence from backward construction/ inverted structure to a normal construction(in which subject precedes the verb) by just changing the order to Y is X for the original sentence "X is Y" ?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , VeritasPrepBrian, GMATGuruNY , VeritasKarishma , DmitryFarber , RonPurewal , ChiranjeevSingh , other experts - please enlighten
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 234
Own Kudos [?]: 398 [6]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
4
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Skywalker18 wrote:
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

The original option is an inverted sentence and can be changed as -
General market inactivity, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance, has been making things even more difficult lately.

If we have a sentence structure "X is(or was) Y".
-If anything before the verb can be the subject, then that's the subject.
- If nothing before the verb can be the subject, then we have a backward construction/ inverted structure (in which subject follows the verb)

On the table are two cell phones --> Two cell phones are on the table ---> I just changed the order and since the sentence is simple -- it's easy

Can we convert a sentence from backward construction/ inverted structure to a normal construction(in which subject precedes the verb) by just changing the order to Y is X for the original sentence "X is Y" ?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , VeritasPrepBrian, GMATGuruNY , VeritasKarishma , DmitryFarber , RonPurewal , ChiranjeevSingh , other experts - please enlighten

Hi Skywalker18,

This sentence cannot be broken down into "X is Y" -- "making" here needs to be interpreted either as a part of the verb ("has been making") or as a modifier (which cannot be the subject or object of a sentence). Consider this sentence:

Skywalker was studying for the test all night.

The verb here is "was studying", not just "was". If we invert this sentence:

Studying for the test all night was Skywalker.

we end up with a Yoda-like sentence (which is unfortunately not correct). Alternately, we could use "studying" as a modifier:

Studying for the test all night, Skywalker was determined to get a good score.

However, this only works because we have a separate independent clause (Skywalker was determined...).

I hope that helps!
-Carolyn
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5183
Own Kudos [?]: 4654 [0]
Given Kudos: 632
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Skywalker18 wrote:
Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

The original option is an inverted sentence and can be changed as -
General market inactivity, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance, has been making things even more difficult lately.

If we have a sentence structure "X is(or was) Y".
-If anything before the verb can be the subject, then that's the subject.
- If nothing before the verb can be the subject, then we have a backward construction/ inverted structure (in which subject follows the verb)

On the table are two cell phones --> Two cell phones are on the table ---> I just changed the order and since the sentence is simple -- it's easy

Can we convert a sentence from backward construction/ inverted structure to a normal construction(in which subject precedes the verb) by just changing the order to Y is X for the original sentence "X is Y" ?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , VeritasPrepBrian, GMATGuruNY , VeritasKarishma , DmitryFarber , RonPurewal , ChiranjeevSingh , other experts - please enlighten
You should be able to do that, if you already have a correct Y is X in front of you. Just watch out for a few cases in which the X is a little longer than in your examples:

1. In no movie is he the villain.
Here we have to leave the villain where it is (He is the villain in no movie, and not He the villain is in no movie).

2. Rarely are tigers seen in the wild nowadays.
When the is or are is a helping verb, we need to take the rest of the verb into account.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2018
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 153 [0]
Given Kudos: 445
Location: India
Schools: IIM (II)
GMAT 1: 640 Q46 V32
GPA: 3.84
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
EMPOWERgmatVerbal wrote:
Hello Everyone!

Let's take a closer look at this question and tackle it, one problem at a time! Before we dive in, here is the original question with any major differences between the options highlighted in orange:

Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance.

(A) has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided
(B) there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided
(C) general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided
(D) lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided
(E) is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides

After taking a quick glance over the options, there are two main things we can focus on:

1. What comes before the phrase "if not paralysis"
2. What comes after the phrase "if not paralysis"

This sounds like too much to focus on, right? Let's think about this in a different way:

1. Proper placement/use of a non-essential phrase or interjection ("...,if not paralysis,...")
2. Modifier Placement (the phrase "Making things even more difficult" is a modifier)


Let's tackle #1 on our list: non-essential phrases or interjections. In this sentence, the phrase "if not paralysis" is considered an interjection. It's a phrase that's added in to sound more conversational or to add more detail that's not 100% vital to know. For non-essential phrases, they are always put in between commas to indicate that they're not necessary for the sentence to make sense.

To test this, we can cross out the non-essential phrase and check to see if what's left is both a complete sentence and retains its intended meaning. Let's take a look at each option, but with the non-essential phrase crossed out:

(A) Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis,which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance. --> INCORRECT
(What's left over is a run-on sentence, which means the phrase isn't in the right place or the wording in the rest of the sentence is wrong.)

(B) Making things even more difficult there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided little in the way of pricing guidance. --> INCORRECT
(What's left over is a run-on sentence, so this is also wrong.)

(C) Making things even more difficult general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided little in the way of pricing guidance. --> INCORRECT
(This can't stand alone because it needs a comma between "difficult" and "general" to separate the modifier from the subject.)

(D) Making things even more difficult lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis,has provided little in the way of pricing guidance. --> CORRECT

This is our CORRECT option because it's the only one that uses the non-essential phrase and modifiers correctly!

(E) Making things even more difficult is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis,which provides little in the way of pricing guidance. --> INCORRECT
(This is actually a very long sentence fragment! If it cannot stand alone as a complete sentence without the non-essential phrase, it's not the right choice.)

There you have it - option D is the correct choice! It's the only that uses a non-essential phrase correctly, which is a common problem on the GMAT you can easily spot and test out!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.




Hello EMPOWERgmatVerbal,

Thanks for such detailed explanation. I have a doubt in your explanation of why option D is wrong of this problem. As far as I understand, gmac won't create a wrong option just based on a punctuation mark, here ", ". Can you please enlighten us on that matter.


Thanks,
Tamal

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5183
Own Kudos [?]: 4654 [1]
Given Kudos: 632
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
tamal99 wrote:
Hello EMPOWERgmatVerbal,

Thanks for such detailed explanation. I have a doubt in your explanation of why option D is wrong of this problem. As far as I understand, gmac won't create a wrong option just based on a punctuation mark, here ", ". Can you please enlighten us on that matter.


Thanks,
Tamal
Did you mean option C (or maybe B)?

Punctuation is tested on the GMAT. What we don't have to worry about too much is style. So, for example, there is no (reliable) way to remove an option just because it has (or does not have) a comma before an and. Different people have different recommendations on how to handle style issues, but the need for a comma in C is not that kind of an issue.

Working quickly, he did something. ← This sentence is okay.
Working quickly he did something. ← This sentence is incorrect, and there is no real debate about it. That is, we won't find a significant number of people arguing that the sentence is fine without a comma.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity [#permalink]
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne