|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 959
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 38
Kudos [?]:
557
[1] , given: 40
|
Prior to 1980, many American-made cars did not have [#permalink]
18 Jun 2010, 02:28
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
82% (02:03) correct
17% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions
Prior to 1980, many American-made cars did not have anti-lock brakes. These brakes help to prevent cars from skidding and spinning out on ice, and would therefore seem to increase driver control. However, after 1980, when all American-made cars were manufactured with anti-lock brakes, the number of U.S. drivers who experience car accidents due to skidding or spinning out on ice increased by 4 percent annually. Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the increase in the number of drivers who skidded and spun out on ice? (A) During the winter, the U.S. has an unusually large number of icy roadways. (B) Cars can be just as likely to skid and spin out just after the beginning of a snowstorm as when roads are covered by patches of ice. (C) Prior to the introduction of anti-lock brakes in American cars, more drivers skidded and spun out in the U.S. than in any other country. (D) After 1980, many U.S. drivers who had specifically avoided driving in icy conditions no longer did so. (E) Many drivers skid and spin out on ice because they fail to steer appropriately rather than because their cars lack anti-lock brakes.
_________________
Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 18
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
18 Jun 2010, 03:34
IMO E. What is OA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 26 May 2010
Posts: 15
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[1] , given: 0
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
18 Jun 2010, 03:59
1
This post received KUDOS
raisethebar wrote: IMO E. What is OA? IMO D. E is a generic statement. It doesn't explain the reason for increase in accidents. OA please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1481
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 13
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
19 Jun 2010, 13:11
E? I dont think D is right because even if many drivers who earlier didnt drive started driving it still doesn't prove that ABS wasn't effective... E directly counters this position and says that accidents can happen even with ABS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 06 Mar 2010
Posts: 108
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 11
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
19 Jun 2010, 13:14
E introduces an alternate cause for the underlined effect. Please post the OA to know the correct answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 22
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
19 Jun 2010, 13:20
110% E. why do you come up with D?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: The last round
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 1327
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Followers: 43
Kudos [?]:
383
[0], given: 156
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
19 Jun 2010, 13:29
This question best explains what will I do in GMAT if I see a question like this. First choice of 98% people will be option "E". But will GMAT show a very clear answer choice? I think it should be "D". The question doesn't mention the anti locking brakes any where, so I am going with D.
_________________
[ From 470 to 680-My Story ] [ My Last Month Before Test ] [ GMAT Prep Analysis Tool ] [ US. Business School Dashboard ] [ Int. Business School Dashboard ]
I Can, I Will
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 22
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
19 Jun 2010, 13:47
you will be wrong. you should read between the lines. the question asks for an alternative exp. e it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 May 2010
Posts: 143
Followers: 52
Kudos [?]:
224
[7] , given: 0
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
19 Jun 2010, 13:52
7
This post received KUDOS
It sounds like some of you are confusing weakening questions with resolve-the-paradox questions. When weakening a causal argument, you do indeed want to offer an alternative cause. But resolve-the-paradox questions are like strengthening questions, only instead of strengthening the conclusion, you need to strengthen the sentence that starts with the word of contrast (however, but, nevertheless, etc.). In this problem you want to explain why it is that "after 1980, ... the number of U.S. drivers who experience car accidents due to skidding or spinning out on ice increased by 4 percent annually." The only answer that explains why skidding/spinning increased after 1980 is D. A tip for resolve-the paradox questions: Take the sentence that starts with the word of contrast (however, but, nevertheless, nonetheless, etc.), in your head add the the word 'because' after it, and then read your answer to see if it makes sense.Ex. Skidding/spinning increased after 1980 because "after 1980, many U.S. drivers who had specifically avoided driving in icy conditions no longer did so." For more useful tips and tricks on the topic, check out the Critical Reasoning III lesson at gmaxonline.
_________________
Sarai GMAT Verbal Instructor at GMAX Visit me at www.theverbalcorner.com
If this helped, kindly give Kudos!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 959
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 38
Kudos [?]:
557
[0], given: 40
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
19 Jun 2010, 21:50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 12
Kudos [?]:
271
[0], given: 36
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
20 Jun 2010, 19:25
SaraiGMAXonline wrote: But resolve-the-paradox questions are like strengthening questions, only instead of strengthening the conclusion, you need to strengthen the sentence that starts with the word of contrast (however, but, nevertheless, etc.). Wow that hit me.  Nice catch !
_________________
Please press kudos if you like my post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 172
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 1
|
Re: Anti-lock brakes [#permalink]
21 Jun 2010, 05:35
Hussain15 wrote: This question best explains what will I do in GMAT if I see a question like this.
First choice of 98% people will be option "E". But will GMAT show a very clear answer choice? I think it should be "D". The question doesn't mention the anti locking brakes any where, so I am going with D. Even i was with D and almost staking GMAT prep on this. D IS IT
_________________
R E S P E C T
Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Posts: 83
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 31
|
Re: Prior to 1980, many American-made cars did not have [#permalink]
22 Apr 2012, 11:28
E explains why people tend to skid on ICY roads but it fails to address the paradox that the number of drivers who skid on ICE increased much after ABS was introduced compared to the period without ABS.
The clear answer is, more people started to drive on ICY roads. That goes with the reasoning provided in the option C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 374
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
62
[0], given: 31
|
Re: Prior to 1980, many American-made cars did not have [#permalink]
23 Apr 2012, 00:12
STRAIGHT D.................!!!
_________________
Practice Practice and practice...!!
If my reply /analysis is helpful-->please press KUDOS If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 271
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37 GMAT 2: Q V
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
458
[0], given: 48
|
Re: Prior to 1980, many American-made cars did not have [#permalink]
23 Jun 2012, 06:11
ykaiim wrote: (E) Many drivers skid and spin out on ice because they fail to steer appropriately rather than because their cars lack anti-lock brakes. even if this is true, it doesn't explain the rise in the incidents. the same drivers spun earlier as well; why the rise? D explains the rise and, hence, is the correct ans.
_________________
press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts Download Valuable Collection of Percentage Questions (PS/DS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 6
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 2
|
Re: Prior to 1980, many American-made cars did not have [#permalink]
23 Jun 2012, 16:36
Initial guess was 'E' but from the tip provided by SaraiGMAX I go with 'D'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 272
GMAT 1: 750 Q V
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
34
[0], given: 6
|
Re: Prior to 1980, many American-made cars did not have [#permalink]
24 Jun 2012, 03:23
Straight D. Accidents increased increased despite development of ABS because drivers became less risk averse. Cheers, Der alte Fritz.
_________________
+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Prior to 1980, many American-made cars did not have
[#permalink]
24 Jun 2012, 03:23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|