Last visit was: 09 May 2024, 02:29 It is currently 09 May 2024, 02:29

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 263
Own Kudos [?]: 328 [4]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Apr 2014
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2017
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 158
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2017
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 166
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.19
Send PM
Re: Shopkeeper: Every year, for the past five years, we have had to raise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Can someone explain me why option E is not correct ? I agree that option D does weaken the argument, but option E also weakens the argument by indicating that there is another country that offers low prices of heating oil. Low prices of heating oil should make their costs less. Thus lower merchandise costs. Please someone help im confused.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2017
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: Shopkeeper: Every year, for the past five years, we have had to raise [#permalink]
hovhannesmkrtchyan wrote:
Can someone explain me why option E is not correct ? I agree that option D does weaken the argument, but option E also weakens the argument by indicating that there is another country that offers low prices of heating oil. Low prices of heating oil should make their costs less. Thus lower merchandise costs. Please someone help im confused.


To hovhannesmkrtchyan,
Here is my thinking about E.

I think E is nothing.
The target of weaken is make conclusion wrong.
Conclusion is 'We should expect to increase our price again'
'Unless we decide to import our oil from another country or reduce our dependence on heating ool'
is not conclusion, but some conditions, which do not need to must be true.
So D is better.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2017
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 509
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V30
GPA: 3.35
Send PM
Shopkeeper: Every year, for the past five years, we have had to raise [#permalink]
GMATNinja
MagooshExpert

hello expert
can you please explain why option E is not correct
my understanding:At least one country other than Navinia offers to sell heating oil at significantly lower prices

as there exist more than one country that offers oil at a lower price,so oil price will not increase an thus the merchandise prices
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5432 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Shopkeeper: Every year, for the past five years, we have had to raise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
JAIN09 wrote:
GMATNinja
MagooshExpert

hello expert
can you please explain why option E is not correct
my understanding:At least one country other than Navinia offers to sell heating oil at significantly lower prices

as there exist more than one country that offers oil at a lower price,so oil price will not increase an thus the merchandise prices


Hey JAIN09 ,

Looks like you have not understood the argument properly.

Author's conclusion is we should expect to increase our prices again next year unless we get oil from someone else or we reduce our dependency.

That means author himself is saying "Hey, I got a country selling me cheaper product, I won't increase the prices" or "Hey, we reduced our dependency, I won't increase the prices". But if none of these happens, I will increase the prices.

Option E is actually saying "We have another country to get the cheaper oil." So, this is no way breaking what author said. This option is actually inline with what Author mentioned. Hence, not a weakener.

Check out my this post where I have explained Unless P, then Q rules. :)

Does that make sense?
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17281
Own Kudos [?]: 849 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Shopkeeper: Every year, for the past five years, we have had to raise [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Shopkeeper: Every year, for the past five years, we have had to raise [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6922 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne