aditya111 wrote:
dhruvd wrote:
I agree, the only confusion was between options A and D. All the other options are irrelevant.
I think option D is correct because the question has this statement: This way, each facility will be forced to work more efficiently and each remaining employee will have a greater incentive to work additional hours to keep her job. If the Executive doesn't realize that the strength will just not be enough then his plan completely falls apart.
-----------------------------
Press kudos if this helped you
How can a statement by some cosultant cripple the argument when we don't even know the validity and scope of the statement
Do consider
KUDOS if this post made you look at the discussion in a new way..
Dear Aditya,
Remember these fundamental rules while solving the weaken question.
1) The answer should refute only the conclusion and not any premise, evidence or fact presented in stimulus. e.g. if the conclusion is based on the fact presented as evidence, your answer can not challenge that fact however it can assert that how the fact can not be the evidence for the conclusion.
2) The answer choices are accepted as given, even if they include
new information. So in our case we can take the management consultants report as true and can weaken the conclusion with that.
Regards,
Abhijit