Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 09:30 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 09:30

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Apr 2011
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 54 [21]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Apr 2011
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 54 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
I do not agree with the perception of the use of progressive tense in four of the choices in this topic. It may be noted that a progressive tense is used to describe some thing that is/was/has been /had been happening at the moment of saying it Here we are not making a running commentary of an event We are just expressing Carl’s style of explaining. We should normally use a simple present tense ‘explains”

All the four choices A, B, D, and E are wrong. D and E in addition shift the tense from the present to past. At best, we can agree with Chocie C, which uses present perfect tense ‘has explained’. If it is a one-time event, go for present perfect. If it is a generality, then go for simple present (which is not there) So C is the best. This is IMO
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 76 [2]
Given Kudos: 65
Send PM
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
2
Kudos
I personally went with B. We are talking about an event that happened in the past and is still continuing into the future.

B makes perfect sense to me.

A is talking as if Car is actually "Explaining and doing that action" right that moment.

And here's the actual source from NYtimes

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/your ... llery.html

In a continuing series of back-of-the-napkin drawings and posts on the Bucks blog. Carl Richards, a financial planner, has been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams. Here we bring them to you all in one place for easier browsing.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2013
Status:Oh GMAT ! I give you one more shot :)
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 498 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
1
Kudos
chamisool wrote:
In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, who is a financial planner, is explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.

A. In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, who is a financial planner, is explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.
B. In a continuing series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, has been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.
C. In a continuing series involving back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, has explained the basics of money by means of simple graphs and diagrams.
D. In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings a financial planner, Carl Richards, had been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.
E. In a continuing series from back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, was explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.


Option B would be perfect except for the problem with intended meaning.
In a continuing series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner

In my opinion Carl Richards is the financial planner, but as per this sentence a financial planner is qualifying the noun back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards
shouldn't there be a comma before Carl Richards to separate it from back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings

Experts please help.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2013
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Send PM
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, who is a financial planner, is explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.[/u]

A. In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, who is a financial planner, is explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams. "is explaining is wrong" should be past tense & not present tense
B. In a continuing series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, has been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.
C. In a continuing series involving back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, has explained the basics of money by means of simple graphs and diagrams. should be in present perfect tense
D. In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings a financial planner, Carl Richards, had been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.
E. In a continuing series from back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, was explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2014
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 146 [1]
Given Kudos: 89
Concentration: Marketing, Healthcare
Send PM
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
1
Kudos
In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, who is a financial planner, is explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.

A. In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, who is a financial planner, is explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams -- is explaining shows present continuous

B. In a continuing series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, has been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams --- has been explaining shows correct verb usage

C. In a continuing series involving back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, has explained the basics of money by means of simple graphs and diagrams --- has explained distorts continuity

D. In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings a financial planner, Carl Richards, had been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams --- continuous is wrong, should be -ing form

E. In a continuing series from back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, was explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams --- from is wrong, should be of [/quote]



IMO B is correct
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 289
Own Kudos [?]: 715 [2]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
reto wrote:
King407 wrote:
In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, who is a financial planner, is explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.

A. In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, who is a financial planner, is explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams -- is explaining shows present continuous

B. In a continuing series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, has been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams --- has been explaining shows correct verb usage

C. In a continuing series involving back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, has explained the basics of money by means of simple graphs and diagrams --- has explained distorts continuity

D. In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings a financial planner, Carl Richards, had been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams --- continuous is wrong, should be -ing form

E. In a continuing series from back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, was explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams --- from is wrong, should be of



Hi Reto,

In A "who is a financial planner" is unnecessary since we dont have two people and the person concerned is immediately before the comma.

Also in a process that started earlier and is still continuing we use "has been" instead of "is".

Kindly notice that in option A "the series is continuous" while in B "the series is continuing".

Hence in option A the word "continuous" is an adjective modifying the "series" and in option B "continuing" is an adjective showing that the series is still going on.

Hope its in black and white. :)

Regards,
Dom.
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
metu0math wrote:
Why not a? I think this question is not a proper one! There is no problem with who is a ...

Posted from GMAT ToolKit


A is grammatically correct, but B is better for the following reasons:

1. Concision: "who is" are two extra words to convey the same meaning.
2. Tense: The series has started some time ago and is still continuing. Hence present perfect rather then present continuous is better. (though the meaning that the explanation is happening right now is not quite wrong either).

In the real GMAT, you may probably expect to get more severe errors in the wrong options.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2016
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 350
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
The sentence talks about a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings. Therefore, in such a case the usage of present perfect is not the ideal usage as it reflects an event that is completed in present. It makes sense to use Present continuous sense and therefore, option B is appropriate.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28574 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
chamisool wrote:
In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, who is a financial planner, is explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams.

A. In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, who is a financial planner, is explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams
B. In a continuing series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, has been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams
C. In a continuing series involving back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, has explained the basics of money by means of simple graphs and diagrams
D. In a continuous series of back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings a financial planner, Carl Richards, had been explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams
E. In a continuing series from back‐of‐the‐napkin drawings Carl Richards, a financial planner, was explaining the basics of money through simple graphs and diagrams

This is really one of the worst attempts at a GMAT SC practice questions that I have ever seen. This might be the single worst question on the entire GMAT Club site. That's impressive, in a strange way.

I don't know why "simple graphs and diagrams" is underlined, since it's the same in all five answer choices. Considering how much is underlined, a ridiculously small amount of the sentence varies from one choice to the next.

I can imagine scenarios in which any of the five answer choices could be correct. Of course the meaning is different in all five, so that doesn't make any answer better than any other.

Mike
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17226
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In a continuous series of back of the napkin drawings Carl [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne