merper wrote:
Dinged as well.
These numbers are so bizarre. They are accepting fewer people now? If they admit 350 out of 4500(assuming number is unchanged from last year, that's a freaking 8% admit rate. That's more selective than Harvard. Also why did the numbers of admits go down by 60? Are the rest LGO or other programs?
Anyway, even if their class size is 400 overall and their yield is 70%, they should make offers to 11% of applicants and probably interview about 20%. They interviewed just about 32%(!!) of Round 1 here, which leaves only 8-11% max for Round 2 JUST FOR INTERVIEWS(assuming the sample at GMATclub is representative of the larger applicant pool and equal round sizes).
Why did I spend $200 on a round 2 app here if they didn't have many spots left to offer? Something is off somewhere here, and I'll be interested to see what their official admit rate is, though they won't break it down by round.
Just a thought: The GMAT club R2 Sloan appears to be heavily skewed towards males. Let's assume that the class of '16 deferral story is even close to accurate (25-50). For a number of reasons, I have the idea that males were more likely to bite on the deferral $$ for a number of reasons. Further, the increase in females as a % of the class from class of '15 to 16' (34% to 39%) supports this theory. Now let's continue this thought process and assume that the Adcom is interested in at least maintaining if not improving upon this 40/60 split.
Now, if we assume the GMAT club Sloan R2 applicant pool is heavily skewed towards males, then perhaps GMAT club's R2 interview percentage actually reflects a reasonable proxy for all R2 males, which is to say very, very low. Probably even more so if you are from traditional backgrounds like myself. Really wish I had done more research on this reality 4 months ago and applied elsewhere. The info was out there.