Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 02:03 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 02:03

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 724 [70]
Given Kudos: 155
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92929
Own Kudos [?]: 619095 [31]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2014
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [4]
Given Kudos: 43
Schools: HBS '19
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 724 [0]
Given Kudos: 155
Send PM
Re: Is x < w ? [#permalink]
is x < w ?

1) x - w < x

2) x + w < w


Can someone please explain the OA along with the process of solving such sums?
Thanks in advance

Ok i got it now

1) x - w < x
subtract x from both sides :

-w < 0
w > 0 but no clue about x ------> insufficient

2) x + w < w
subtract w from both sides :
x < 0 =====> no clue about w ---> insufficient

C) 1 + 2
w > 0 and x < 0 hence x < w ------> sufficient

Can some one please confirm whether my reasoning is correct.
I believe dividing or multiplying by an expression (such as w and or x) in this case is wrong, Since it is not mentioned whether x & or w is +ve/-ve and or int or a fraction
But subtraction should be ok.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2014
Status:I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Posts: 474
Own Kudos [?]: 38831 [1]
Given Kudos: 220
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE:Business Development (Real Estate)
Send PM
Re: Is x < w ? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Top Contributor
aniketm.87@gmail.com wrote:
is x < w ?

1) x - w < x

2) x + w < w


Can someone please explain the OA along with the process of solving such sums?
Thanks in advance

Ok i got it now

1) x - w < x
subtract x from both sides :

-w < 0
w > 0 but no clue about x ------> insufficient

2) x + w < w
subtract w from both sides :
x < 0 =====> no clue about w ---> insufficient

C) 1 + 2
w > 0 and x < 0 hence x < w ------> sufficient

Can some one please confirm whether my reasoning is correct.
I believe dividing or multiplying by an expression (such as w and or x) in this case is wrong, Since it is not mentioned whether x & or w is +ve/-ve and or int or a fraction
But subtraction should be ok.


IMO,
    You are absolutely correct since both side of the inequities in Statement(1 and (2) have same expression.Their subtructions are ok
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Status:In the realms of Chaos & Night
Posts: 125
Own Kudos [?]: 624 [2]
Given Kudos: 98
Send PM
Re: Is x < w ? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
Is x < w ?

(1) x - w < x --> w > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) x + w < w --> x < 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) x < 0 < w. Sufficient.

Answer: C.


Hi Bunuel
As per GMAT Club Math Book - "When you divide both sides by a variable (or do operations like "canceling x on both sides") you implicitly assume that the variable cannot be equal to 0, as division by 0 is undefined."
Does this apply only for division. Is it allowed to add, subtract or multiply without knowing the sign (+ve or -ve) for that variable in an inequality.
Please explain or share any link which addresses this confusion.
In both the case above you have subtracted one of the variable from both sides.
Thanks
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92929
Own Kudos [?]: 619095 [4]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: Is x < w ? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Nightfury14 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is x < w ?

(1) x - w < x --> w > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) x + w < w --> x < 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) x < 0 < w. Sufficient.

Answer: C.


Hi Bunuel
As per GMAT Club Math Book - "When you divide both sides by a variable (or do operations like "canceling x on both sides") you implicitly assume that the variable cannot be equal to 0, as division by 0 is undefined."
Does this apply only for division. Is it allowed to add, subtract or multiply without knowing the sign (+ve or -ve) for that variable in an inequality.
Please explain or share any link which addresses this confusion.
In both the case above you have subtracted one of the variable from both sides.
Thanks


We are concerned about the sign of a number when multiplying/dividing an inequality by that number. However we can safely add/subtract a number from both sides of an inequality.

Inequalities Made Easy!

Solving Quadratic Inequalities - Graphic Approach
Inequality tips
Wavy Line Method Application - Complex Algebraic Inequalities

DS Inequalities Problems
PS Inequalities Problems

700+ Inequalities problems

inequalities-trick-91482.html
data-suff-inequalities-109078.html
range-for-variable-x-in-a-given-inequality-109468.html
everything-is-less-than-zero-108884.html
graphic-approach-to-problems-with-inequalities-68037.html

Hope this helps.
RSM Erasmus Moderator
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 2461
Own Kudos [?]: 1360 [0]
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Send PM
Re: Is x < w ? [#permalink]
Is x < w ?

(1) x - w < x

-w < 0 ...........W>0.......No info about X

Insufficient

(2) x + w < w

x< 0......No info abut W

Insufficient

Combining 1 & 2

x< 0 <w

Answer: C

Alternatively, we can sum up 2 inequalities :

2x-w+w<x +w.............2x<x+w.............2x-x<w...............x<w
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2018
Posts: 66
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 86
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Is x < w ? [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Is x < w ?

(1) x - w < x --> w > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) x + w < w --> x < 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) x < 0 < w. Sufficient.

Answer: C.



Can x<w be re-written as x-w<0?
If not, then why?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92929
Own Kudos [?]: 619095 [0]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: Is x < w ? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Shbm wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is x < w ?

(1) x - w < x --> w > 0. Not sufficient.

(2) x + w < w --> x < 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) x < 0 < w. Sufficient.

Answer: C.



Can x<w be re-written as x-w<0?
If not, then why?


You can add or subtract a value from both parts of an inequality freely. So, you can subtract w from x < w and get x - w < 0.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2021
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [0]
Given Kudos: 115
Send PM
Re: Is x < w ? [#permalink]
dividing both sides by the corresponding letter is easy, however I did not feel sure about that method because in some questions is not possible to solve them in that way so I just thought about possible values for the letters.

(1)x-w<x

so in order to subtract something from x with a result less than x, either x is negative and w is positive (x<w) or x is positive and w is positive (x<>=w), since we have many different values for x and w, (1) is insufficient.

(2)x+w<w

when will w+x be smaller than w? either w is negative and x is negative (w><=x) or w is positive and x is negative (w>x). Becase we have multiple values for x and W, (2) is insufficient.

(1)+(2) add the inequalities
x-w+x+w<x+w
2x<x+w
x<w

IMO C
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is x < w ? [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92922 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne