|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 509
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 20
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 262
|
The proposed simplification of the tax code would repeal or [#permalink]
 03 Oct 2012, 21:11
Question Stats:
75% (01:58) correct
25% (01:25) wrong based on 1 sessions
The proposed simplification of the tax code would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced across the board. A. would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced B. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates can be reduced C. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, which includes the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced D. would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so as to reduce income tax rates E. would repeal and modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced
_________________
First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 120
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
33
[0], given: 12
|
Re: The proposed simplification of the tax [#permalink]
04 Oct 2012, 00:52
getgyan wrote: The proposed simplification of the tax code would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced across the board.
A. would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced
B. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates can be reduced
C. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, which includes the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced
D. would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so as to reduce income tax rates
E. would repeal and modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced Since it is talking about a proposal and not a certain outcome is ascertained, "would" is a better usage than "will". A. No errors. Correct usage of "would" and "could". B. No error per se, but "will" is to be used when the outcome is sure. So A is better. C. "will" and "could" -> inconsistency. D. "so as to" makes the construction awkward. E. "repeal and modify" is not correct. A is the "best" choice.
_________________
Shouvik
http://www.Edvento.com
admin@edvento.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 509
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 20
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 262
|
Re: The proposed simplification of the tax [#permalink]
04 Oct 2012, 03:02
Edvento wrote:
Since it is talking about a proposal and not a certain outcome is ascertained, "would" is a better usage than "will".
"Would" is used when we talk about future in the past. Here we are talking about future in present. Also we cannot say for sure whether the outcome is ascertained or not? Any thoughts? Do you still think would is more correct than will? 
_________________
First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 120
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
33
[0], given: 12
|
Re: The proposed simplification of the tax [#permalink]
04 Oct 2012, 06:54
getgyan wrote: Edvento wrote:
Since it is talking about a proposal and not a certain outcome is ascertained, "would" is a better usage than "will".
"Would" is used when we talk about future in the past. Here we are talking about future in present. Also we cannot say for sure whether the outcome is ascertained or not? Any thoughts? Do you still think would is more correct than will? When we talk about a hypothetical future from a past scenario, we use "would have". And when the outcome is uncertain, we use "would". "Will" is used when something is sure. "Tomorrow the sun will rise from the east". Here, "would" is applicable.
_________________
Shouvik
http://www.Edvento.com
admin@edvento.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 26
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 3
|
Re: The proposed simplification of the tax [#permalink]
04 Oct 2012, 07:41
OA Please....
please insert the OA using spoiler along with the question..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2012
Posts: 17
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 7
|
Re: The proposed simplification of the tax code would repeal or [#permalink]
01 Nov 2012, 22:12
getgyan wrote: The proposed simplification of the tax code would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced across the board.
A. would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced
B. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates can be reduced
C. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, which includes the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced
D. would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so as to reduce income tax rates
E. would repeal and modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could be reduced The sentence talks about a proposed law so the use of "would" and "could" is better than "will" and "can". If the law is already enacted then the use of "will" and "can" is correct. Will and can are used when talking about something which is certain and "would" and "could" are used when something is still not certain. So going by this the correct option is A. A:Correct. Proper use of would/could to indicate proposed law. B:Wrong. Will/Can cannot be used here since the law is not yet passed C:Wrong.Will/Could is incorrect,should be either would/could or will/can . Also "which" refers to breaks(plural) so we need "include" to go with which. D:Wrong: There is nothing wrong in this sentence as such but I think A is much better. I think "so as to" make the sentence sound little awkward. E:Wrong. You cannot repeal and then modify. It should be repeal or modify.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: The proposed simplification of the tax code would repeal or
[#permalink]
01 Nov 2012, 22:12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|
close
