Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 Oct 2014, 00:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

For each of the past two years, major department stores have

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
6 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2012
Posts: 52
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 510 Q36 V25
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Other)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 51 [6] , given: 105

For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2013, 06:34
6
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (02:21) correct 62% (01:29) wrong based on 470 sessions
For each of the past two years, major department stores have reported a nearly 50% increase in their sales of men's clothing manufactured by Zachary, Inc., a result that is all the more surprising because the sales of most other brands of men's clothing have been depressed over the same period. Nevertheless, even Zachary, Inc. does not appear to have emerged unscathed from the overall trend: despite the aforementioned increase, Zachary, Inc. has reported a slight decline in overall sales in each of the past two years.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surprising result above?

A) The sales of clothing at Zachary, Inc.'s boutique stores, which, unlike department stores, are owned and operated by the company itself, have held steady over the last two years.

B) Two years ago, Zachary, Inc. began an ambitious new advertising campaign; in each of the last two years, the company's advertising department has overspent its planned budget by almost half.

C) Zachary, Inc. is renowned for the quality of its fabrics, and sells large quantities of fabric to other manufacturers of men's clothing.

D) Zachary, Inc. formerly manufactured leather accessories and women's clothing in addition to men's clothing, but, for the past three years, the company has produced only men's clothing.

E) In the last two years, the percentage of Zachary, Inc.'s clothing sold by department stores at discounted prices has been unusually high, a result that analysts have blamed on the sluggish economy.

+1 if u got it right :-D
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 64
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [1] , given: 9

Re: Zachary's Inc [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2013, 09:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
got stuck between C and E..

Final take is C
_________________

giving kudos is the best thing you can do for me..

21 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1100
Location: United States
Followers: 127

Kudos [?]: 1313 [21] , given: 120

Premium Member
Re: Zachary's Inc [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2013, 22:07
21
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
thinktank wrote:
For each of the past two years, major department stores have reported a nearly 50% increase in their sales of men's clothing manufactured by Zachary, Inc., a result that is all the more surprising because the sales of most other brands of men's clothing have been depressed over the same period. Nevertheless, even Zachary, Inc. does not appear to have emerged unscathed from the overall trend: despite the aforementioned increase, Zachary, Inc. has reported a slight decline in overall sales in each of the past two years.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surprising result above?

A) The sales of clothing at Zachary, Inc.'s boutique stores, which, unlike department stores, are owned and operated by the company itself, have held steady over the last two years.

B) Two years ago, Zachary, Inc. began an ambitious new advertising campaign; in each of the last two years, the company's advertising department has overspent its planned budget by almost half.

C) Zachary, Inc. is renowned for the quality of its fabrics, and sells large quantities of fabric to other manufacturers of men's clothing.

D) Zachary, Inc. formerly manufactured leather accessories and women's clothing in addition to men's clothing, but, for the past three years, the company has produced only men's clothing.

E) In the last two years, the percentage of Zachary, Inc.'s clothing sold by department stores at discounted prices has been unusually high, a result that analysts have blamed on the sluggish economy.

+1 if u got it right :-D


GENERAL METHOD:

For Resolve the Paradox questions, we must select an answer that can explain both sides of the situation, not only one side. That's the KEY.
Before solving this question, please note that there are two types of answers ALWAYS are incorrect:
1. Explain only one side of the paradox.
2. Just explain the similarities and differences, e.g. if the stimulus contains a paradox where two items are similar, then an answer choice explains a difference between the two cannot be correct.

APPLY:

The logic here is: men clothing manufactured by Zachary increased 50%, but overall sales of Zachary slightly decreased. You see the gap? OVERALL Sales do not mean ONLY men clothing. If you see an answer that shows Zachary men clothing sales increased, but sales of Zachary's products OTHER THAN men clothing decreased. That would be the answer. Because OVERALL SALES = MEN CLOTHING + OTHER PRODUCTS. Only men clothing sales increased is not enough to conclude Overall sales increased.


CONSIDER EACH ANSWERS:

A) The sales of clothing at Zachary, Inc.'s boutique stores, which, unlike department stores, are owned and operated by the company itself, have held steady over the last two years. - WRONG - Out of scope

B) Two years ago, Zachary, Inc. began an ambitious new advertising campaign; in each of the last two years, the company's advertising department has overspent its planned budget by almost half. - WRONG - Out of scope

C) Zachary, Inc. is renowned for the quality of its fabrics, and sells large quantities of fabric to other manufacturers of men's clothing. - CORRECT - Because Zachary's fabric is famous, so many people want to buy men clothing manufactured by the company --> Men clothing sales increased. Besides men clothing, Zachary also sells fabrics to other manufactures. However, other manufactures sales decreased because of weak economy (mentioned in the stimulus), making Zachary's overall sales slightly decreased. Because they are also Zachary's customers. This is the answer!

D) Zachary, Inc. formerly manufactured leather accessories and women's clothing in addition to men's clothing, but, for the past three years, the company has produced only men's clothing. - WRONG - Out of scope.

E) In the last two years, the percentage of Zachary, Inc.'s clothing sold by department stores at discounted prices has been unusually high, a result that analysts have blamed on the sluggish economy. - WRONG - Please review my note above, the answer that explains only one side is ALWAYS incorrect. E only explains why men clothing sales of Zachary increased, but doesn't explain why Zachary's overall sales decreased. That cannot be the answer.


I hope it helps a little bit.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Posts: 9
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 10

Re: Zachary's Inc [#permalink] New post 23 Sep 2013, 18:02
pqhai wrote:
For Resolve the Paradox questions, we must select an answer that can explain both sides of the situation, not only one side. That's the KEY.
Before solving this question, please note that there are two types of answers ALWAYS are incorrect:
1. Explain only one side of the paradox.


Can you please provide some examples?
That would be gr8 help in understanding this.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1100
Location: United States
Followers: 127

Kudos [?]: 1313 [0], given: 120

Premium Member
Re: Zachary's Inc [#permalink] New post 23 Sep 2013, 19:39
dixjatin wrote:
pqhai wrote:
For Resolve the Paradox questions, we must select an answer that can explain both sides of the situation, not only one side. That's the KEY.
Before solving this question, please note that there are two types of answers ALWAYS are incorrect:
1. Explain only one side of the paradox.


Can you please provide some examples?
That would be gr8 help in understanding this.


Hi dixjatin

Thank you. You have a very good question.

The idea of resolve the paradox is that you must give a reason that can explain both sides.
For example: Houses that are near beaches are always expensive. However, many people reduces their house prices that are near South beaches.
If you see any option that explains only one side ==> it is a wrong answer. For example:
* Beach atmosphere is cool and many people want to buy house there --> This option only explains why house near beach are expensive (one side of the paradox). --> wrong answer.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 6

Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2013, 06:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
thinktank wrote:
For each of the past two years, major department stores have reported a nearly 50% increase in their sales of men's clothing manufactured by Zachary, Inc., a result that is all the more surprising because the sales of most other brands of men's clothing have been depressed over the same period. Nevertheless, even Zachary, Inc. does not appear to have emerged unscathed from the overall trend: despite the aforementioned increase, Zachary, Inc. has reported a slight decline in overall sales in each of the past two years.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surprising result above?

A) The sales of clothing at Zachary, Inc.'s boutique stores, which, unlike department stores, are owned and operated by the company itself, have held steady over the last two years.

B) Two years ago, Zachary, Inc. began an ambitious new advertising campaign; in each of the last two years, the company's advertising department has overspent its planned budget by almost half.

C) Zachary, Inc. is renowned for the quality of its fabrics, and sells large quantities of fabric to other manufacturers of men's clothing.

D) Zachary, Inc. formerly manufactured leather accessories and women's clothing in addition to men's clothing, but, for the past three years, the company has produced only men's clothing.

E) In the last two years, the percentage of Zachary, Inc.'s clothing sold by department stores at discounted prices has been unusually high, a result that analysts have blamed on the sluggish economy.

+1 if u got it right :-D


I dont get why answer choice D is wrong.
The passage clearly states that the OVERALL sales are down.

If lets say, they used to sell a lot of women accessories and a lot of leather pants, and now they have stopped producing it, but the sales of their clothing for men has increased, it could still be that overall sales is down?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 48
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 9

Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2013, 11:03
E is wrong because the argument discuses discount given on a wrong group ( all clothes) - the paradox is based on men's cloths

While C - the correct answer, discuses the good quality of the fabrics for men's cloths hence explaining why sales have increased due to another set of customers
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 48
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 9

Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2013, 11:07
As for D - it does not address why there seem to be an increase in sales in the men's cloths. The knowledge that Zachary used to manufacture women's accessories but is now only manufacturing men's cloths ADDs nothing to the resolve the argument -
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2011
Posts: 46
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 1

Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 21 Oct 2013, 14:14
waltiebikkiebal wrote:

I dont get why answer choice D is wrong.
The passage clearly states that the OVERALL sales are down.

If lets say, they used to sell a lot of women accessories and a lot of leather pants, and now they have stopped producing it, but the sales of their clothing for men has increased, it could still be that overall sales is down?



If we take pqhai's equation: OVERALL SALES = MEN CLOTHING + OTHER PRODUCTS, and other products are gone. We are left with: OVERALL SALES = MEN CLOTHING.

How can overall sales then be depressed if the men's clothing sale increases?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Apr 2013
Posts: 75
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 23

Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 22 Oct 2013, 10:23
I am not convinced that it's C

C points out that Zachary is a renowned brand , so sales could exceed its competitors, but then again those competitors are using the same materials that Zachary uses, so the advantage to Zachary is somewhat lost. Since buyers can buy the same products from other competitors.

E says that the overall quantity of sales have increased so that explains why sales have been doing better than competitors, but the price is discounted, so the overall revenue will be less than previous years. This choice even spells out that the reduction in price was due to economic conditions. IMO choice E explains both points.

Anyone else can give better insight or challenge my logic on this?
_________________

Struggling: make or break attempt

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2011
Posts: 46
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 1

Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 22 Oct 2013, 15:48
SaraLotfy wrote:
I am not convinced that it's C

C points out that Zachary is a renowned brand , so sales could exceed its competitors, but then again those competitors are using the same materials that Zachary uses, so the advantage to Zachary is somewhat lost. Since buyers can buy the same products from other competitors.

E says that the overall quantity of sales have increased so that explains why sales have been doing better than competitors, but the price is discounted, so the overall revenue will be less than previous years. This choice even spells out that the reduction in price was due to economic conditions. IMO choice E explains both points.

Anyone else can give better insight or challenge my logic on this?


I'll try with an example.

Say Z have two departments, men's clothing and fabrics. Further, since the answer choice states Z sells large quantities of fabrics make the sales between the two departments disproportionate.

year 1
men's clothing sales 50
fabrics 1000
overall sales 1050

year 2
men's clothing sales 100
fabrics 900
overall sales 1000

Since the sales of other manufacturers have been sluggish (sell less) they also buy less fabrics for its clothing manufacturing. Also, because changes in z's fabrics department in this ex. has a bigger impact on overall sales, they are likely to perform worse if the trend in the industry is declining.
So, this ans. choice provides a reasonable explanation of why overall sales decreases.


As for e) you write that men's clothing sales have increased due to cheaper clothes. So, this ans. choice only gives a reason for why one department (men's clothing have increased). Also, there is no mention of revenues in the argument. As a result this does nothing in explaining why overall sales decreases.

Remember, we want to explain the "surprising result" that OVERALL SALES have decreased. This is a fact, thus true, and we cannot challenge this.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 281
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 23

Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 10 May 2014, 16:10
Hi

I do see how C is valid based on the argument above but as a few other posters pointed out, why is D incorrect?

First off, I noted the paradox as: Zach sales have gone up even though other brands have gone down. Isn't "this is all the more surprising" the proper paradox indicator?

Additionally, if we assume that the contrast is between higher revenue in clothing but lower sales, doesn't D answer that? It states that since Zach is ONLY doing clothing, their revenue % is higher but their overall number is lower?

Any experts care to chime in?

Thanks!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2013
Posts: 11
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 139

Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 10 May 2014, 20:15
russ9 wrote:
Hi

I do see how C is valid based on the argument above but as a few other posters pointed out, why is D incorrect?

First off, I noted the paradox as: Zach sales have gone up even though other brands have gone down. Isn't "this is all the more surprising" the proper paradox indicator?

Additionally, if we assume that the contrast is between higher revenue in clothing but lower sales, doesn't D answer that? It states that since Zach is ONLY doing clothing, their revenue % is higher but their overall number is lower?

Any experts care to chime in?

Thanks!


I am no expert, but heres my 2 cents...
The paradox here is Zach's MENS CLOTHING sales have gone up(even though its overall sales have gone down), while other stores have lost sales in the men's clothing department. That would mean Zach's sells other fabrics/products apart from men's clothing.

Option D states exactly opposite of that- it states that 3 years ago Zach used to make leather accessories and women's clothing, but has stopped doing that. Our question is only concerned with the past two years. So D does not help solve the paradox.

Hope I made it a little clear...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 305
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT Date: 04-30-2014
GPA: 3.24
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 109

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2014, 08:39
thinktank wrote:
For each of the past two years, major department stores have reported a nearly 50% increase in their sales of men's clothing manufactured by Zachary, Inc., a result that is all the more surprising because the sales of most other brands of men's clothing have been depressed over the same period. Nevertheless, even Zachary, Inc. does not appear to have emerged unscathed from the overall trend: despite the aforementioned increase, Zachary, Inc. has reported a slight decline in overall sales in each of the past two years.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surprising result above?

A) The sales of clothing at Zachary, Inc.'s boutique stores, which, unlike department stores, are owned and operated by the company itself, have held steady over the last two years.

B) Two years ago, Zachary, Inc. began an ambitious new advertising campaign; in each of the last two years, the company's advertising department has overspent its planned budget by almost half.

C) Zachary, Inc. is renowned for the quality of its fabrics, and sells large quantities of fabric to other manufacturers of men's clothing.

D) Zachary, Inc. formerly manufactured leather accessories and women's clothing in addition to men's clothing, but, for the past three years, the company has produced only men's clothing.

E) In the last two years, the percentage of Zachary, Inc.'s clothing sold by department stores at discounted prices has been unusually high, a result that analysts have blamed on the sluggish economy.

+1 if u got it right :-D


I would be skeptical before questioning the quality of the question..In fact I believe MGMAT guys are better than the GMAC at brewing GMAT questions :wink:
but still I took the men's clothing departmental sales to be the sale of ready made clothes and not fabric cloth..So when C mentioned about the fabric sales..I took it to be an irrelevant and an altogether different section of the sales..
Am I right in doubting the question here or we can expect this ambiguity on the GMAT too..??
_________________

Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 291
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 46

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2014, 19:34
Sometimes CR questions totally fox me and it is not because they are difficult but because they adopt different postures for different questions. C to me looks irrelevant. The question stem contrasts the increase in sale of MEN's clothing with the decrease in OVERALL sales. To me D looks like a point which indicates anything on the decrease in overall sales.

So lets say earlier Zachary Inc was selling 100 men clothing ( MC) + 100 Others. Now the others divison is sold up and the MC has increased its sales by 50 % thus equal to 150. Total sales of Zachary is 150 which is less than the earlier total of 200 inspite of showing a marked increase in sale of man's clothing.

Not convinced with the answer and how it is not out of scope
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2013
Posts: 43
Location: United States
GPA: 3
WE: Information Technology (Insurance)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 18

Premium Member
Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2014, 01:20
Quote:
D) Zachary, Inc. formerly manufactured leather accessories and women's clothing in addition to men's clothing, but, for the past three years, the company has produced only men's clothing. - WRONG - Out of scope.


Can someone please tell me why not D or why s it out of scope? They have been selling other things as well like women's clothing. So though there was an increase in sales of men's clothing their overall sales saw a decline coz they were probably not able to sell other clothing. Could nt that be considered ?
_________________

Never give up, never celebrate, never leave your spot until it is finally over
We are winning this GMAT-war together

"Your one spot for all your GMAT and B-school ranking know hows" - Click here

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 305
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT Date: 04-30-2014
GPA: 3.24
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 109

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2014, 12:01
janxavier wrote:
Quote:
D) Zachary, Inc. formerly manufactured leather accessories and women's clothing in addition to men's clothing, but, for the past three years, the company has produced only men's clothing. - WRONG - Out of scope.


Can someone please tell me why not D or why s it out of scope? They have been selling other things as well like women's clothing. So though there was an increase in sales of men's clothing their overall sales saw a decline coz they were probably not able to sell other clothing. Could nt that be considered ?


Cant say out of scope..but it explains just one part..that too not so strongly..
It doesnt explain the increase in sales of just Zachary
_________________

Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all

Re: For each of the past two years, major department stores have   [#permalink] 07 Jul 2014, 12:01
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 In each of the past five years, imhimanshu 3 28 Sep 2013, 06:58
5 Last year Department Store X had a sales total for December kamal101 8 03 Dec 2007, 17:11
At the end of the year, Wilson s Department Store awards prude_sb 6 18 Feb 2007, 08:25
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic At a certain department store present-wrapping counter, each chiragr 13 08 Feb 2006, 00:16
At the end of the year, Wilson s Department Store awards WinWinMBA 0 18 Jun 2005, 08:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

For each of the past two years, major department stores have

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.