imnik wrote:
Can you please explain why B is not parallel?
expense and investment are same part of speech.
thanks a lot in advance.
First, let's review the parallelism in the correct choice (D):
Quote:
... the head of the Better Business Bureau emphasized that companies should think of the cost of conventions and other similar gatherings not (1) as an expense, but (2) as an investment in networking that will pay dividends.
The two items in the list certainly LOOK parallel--both have the form, "as an [noun]". But to be sure, let's imagine what the sentence would look like if we only had one or the other:
1) "... companies should think of the cost of [X] as an expense."
2) "... companies should think of the cost of [X] as an investment in networking."
Grammatically, these are both fine. That's because both items in the parallel list ("as an expense" and "as an investment") can logically follow "cost of conventions and other similar gatherings".
Now let's check choice (B):
Quote:
... the head of the BBB emphasized that companies should think of the cost of conventions and other similar gatherings as not (1) expense, but (2) an investment in networking that will pay dividends.
The first red flags is that the two items in the list do NOT have the same form: the first is a noun
without an article (a/an/the), and the second is a noun
with an article ("an"). But to be sure, let's do the same test with choice (D):
1) "... companies should think of the cost of [X] as expense."
2) "... companies should think of the cost of as [X] an investment in networking."
The second one is okay, but notice that the first option doesn't work because it's missing an article for "expense"! Choice (D) avoids that problem by putting an article ("an") in front of each item in the parallel list. That makes (D) a better choice.
And if you want a long-winded on special parallelism triggers (both/and, either/or, not/but), here it is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXRz0RBLNus.
I hope that helps!