Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 27 Aug 2014, 21:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink] New post 05 May 2012, 02:47
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (02:37) correct 44% (01:42) wrong based on 152 sessions
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by walker on 28 May 2013, 07:53, edited 1 time in total.
Edited OA
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: GWd #15 V 38 [#permalink] New post 05 May 2012, 03:06
The OA of this question has been very controversial, C vs E.
I initially picked C, but after reading the question again and looking at other people's opinions, I changed my mind into E.

My understanding is like this. feel free to point out flaws.

Q: What misleads the voters to think that the petition is extended from the local ordinances?

C doesn't have anything that could mislead the voters. It is just a prediction that the state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances.

On the other hands,
at the end of the passage, the author says that the petitions advocates a saes law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
And E says that the state law doesn't change the non-smoking places determined by the local ordinances.
Combining those two above, the state law bans smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices while the state law doesn't change non-smoking places determined by the local ordiances.
This might make the voters to think that the petition is extended from the local ordinances.


I am not sure if I explained clearly. It's so hard to explain sth complicated in English, which is not my first language.
1 KUDOS received
BSchool Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 138
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.33
WE: Information Technology (Retail)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 27 [1] , given: 11

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink] New post 19 Nov 2012, 11:02
1
This post received
KUDOS
Please stay away from resources floating around the internet .

The OA to the above given question is C .

It's from the GMAT prep.

Thanks,
Ankit
_________________

You want something, go get it . Period !

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 1704
Followers: 234

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2014, 18:21
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 67

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2014, 07:25
eybrj2 wrote:
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.


What circumstances would misled readers assuming that the petition if approved would make the whole city anti-smoking zone (or extend the purview of the anti-smoking law). "C" highlights the the voters' concern saying that the new law would supersede the existing one, leading to stronger bans.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 217
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 14 [1] , given: 124

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2014, 14:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
eybrj2 wrote:
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.


C. If local antismoking ordinances currently contains stronger bans than the state law does, signing for the petition will actually make the local banning smoking weaker, because local law is replaced by state law. Voters who sign for the petition will want to have stronger local banning smoking ordinances. So C, if exists, actually mislead the voters.
_________________

.........................................................................
+1 Kudos please, if you like my post

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking   [#permalink] 08 Aug 2014, 14:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking gregspirited 7 21 Dec 2007, 08:08
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking foolbox 4 06 Jun 2006, 00:35
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking gamjatang 7 11 Dec 2005, 05:42
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking cybera 5 14 Jul 2005, 15:57
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking nocilis 10 25 Mar 2005, 20:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.