Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 17:00 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 17:00

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 505-555 Levelx   Parallelismx   Subject Verb Agreementx                        
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2013
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 2803 [232]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [65]
Given Kudos: 130
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14673 [25]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [5]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
4
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
thanhmaitran wrote:
Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might, but climatologists have indicated all along that precipitation, storminess, and temperature extremes are likely to have the greatest impact on people.


(A) Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might,

(B) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually had as its focus whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be,

(C) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent,

(D) The discussion of greenhouse effects have usually focused on the possibility of Earth getting warmer and to what extent it might,

(E) The discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and the extent that is,



Concepts tested here: Subject-Verb Agreement + Parallelism + Tenses + Awkwardness/Redundancy

• Any elements joined by a conjunction ("and" in this sentence) must be parallel.
• Future actions are conveyed through the simple future tense.
• The simple present tense is used to indicate actions taking place in the current time frame, indicate habitual actions, state universal truths, and convey information that is permanent in nature.

A: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the singular noun "Discussion" with the plural verb "have...had". Further, Option A fails to maintain parallelism between "the possibility of Earth growing warmer" and "to what extent it might"; remember, any elements joined by a conjunction ("and" in this sentence) must be parallel. Additionally, Option A uses the passive voice construction "had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

B: This answer choice uses the passive voice construction "had as its focus", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

C: Correct. This answer choice correctly refers to the singular noun "Discussion" with the singular verb "has...focused". Further, Option C correctly maintains parallelism between "whether Earth would grow warmer" and "to what extent". Additionally, Option C avoids the tense error seen in Option E, as it uses the noun phrase "to what extent" rather than a phrase that includes an active verb, such as "is" in Option E. Besides, Option C is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.

D: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the singular noun "Discussion" with the plural verb "have...focused". Further, Option D fails to maintain parallelism between "the possibility of Earth growing warmer" and "to what extent it might"; remember, any elements joined by a conjunction ("and" in this sentence) must be parallel.

E: This answer choice fails to maintain parallelism between "whether Earth would grow warmer" and "the extent that is"; remember, any elements joined by a conjunction ("and" in this sentence) must be parallel. Further, Option E incorrectly uses the simple present tense verb "is" to refer to a hypothetical future event; remember, future actions are conveyed through the simple future tense, and the simple present tense is used to indicate actions taking place in the current time frame, indicate habitual actions, state universal truths, and convey information that is permanent in nature.

Hence, C is the best answer choice.

To understand the concept of "Simple Tenses" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~2 minutes):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 123 [8]
Given Kudos: 373
GMAT 1: 630 Q48 V29
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
5
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
thanhmaitran wrote:
Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might, but climatologists have indicated all along that precipitation, storminess, and temperature extremes are likely to have the greatest impact on people.

(A) Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might,

(B) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually had as its focus whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be,

(C) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent,

(D) The discussion of greenhouse effects have usually focused on the possibility of Earth getting warmer and to what extent it might,

(E) The discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and the extent that is,


Experts please help to check.
A , D --- Discussion of X have --> SV error
E --- The discussion has focused on 1) whether Earth would grow warmer 2)the extent that is -->> ||sm issue
Between B and C
B-- has usually had as its focus VS discussion has focused ( Better)
Also in (C) whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent ( would grow warmer) --- complete idea
(B)whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be ( ???) -- looks like incomplete

So (C)
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jan 2016
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 762 [16]
Given Kudos: 176
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
14
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
thanhmaitran wrote:
Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might, but climatologists have indicated all along that precipitation, storminess, and temperature extremes are likely to have the greatest impact on people.

(A) Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might,

(B) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually had as its focus whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be,

(C) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent,

(D) The discussion of greenhouse effects have usually focused on the possibility of Earth getting warmer and to what extent it might,

(E) The discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and the extent that is,


Official answer:

Reasoning:
- The sentence contrasts climatologists' views concerning greenhouse effects with other views that emphasize global warming.
- The main subject of the sentence is discussion....., which is singular, so the main verb should be singular.
- The two things that are said to be the focus of discussion should be in parallel form.

A. The plural verb have...had does not agree with the singular subject discussion. The phrases the possibility... warmer and to what... might are not parallel.

B. The verb form has had as its focus is unnecessarily wordy; the noun clauses are parallel in form, but it is not clear what the extent refers to

C. CORRECT This has correct Subject-Verb agreement, eliminates the wordiness of the original sentence, and the phrases whether... warmer and to what extent are parallel.

D. The singular subject discussion does not agree with the plural verb have focused. The possibility of... is not parallel with to what extent...

E. The two phrases following on are not in parallel form. What that refers to in the extent that is is unclear.
avatar
Tutor
Joined: 03 Sep 2015
Posts: 48
Own Kudos [?]: 222 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
B has “and what the extent would be”. C has “and to what extent”. B is unidiomatic, but notice it is also longer that C. The test makers prefer the simpler, shorter option whenever possible. If you are finding it difficult to decide between two options that sound good to you, it may be the safest option to choose the shorter one. “Until you will not get good marks” is incorrect. The correct expression is “until you get good marks”.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2015
Posts: 87
Own Kudos [?]: 464 [7]
Given Kudos: 405
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V41
GMAT 3: 760 Q49 V46
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
2
Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might, but climatologists have indicated all along that precipitation, storminess, and temperature extremes are likely to have the greatest impact on people.

Subject = Discussion = Singular
Hence need Singular verb

(A) Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might,

(B) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually had as its focus whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be,

Extent of what ?

(C) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent,

CORRECT

(D) The discussion of greenhouse effects have usually focused on the possibility of Earth getting warmer and to what extent it might,

(E) The discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and the extent that is,

Usage of simple present tense is incorrect to denote an action in the future
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 84 [0]
Given Kudos: 147
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
Hi experts,

1/
(B) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually had as its focus whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be,

as I know, the correct is focus on if focus works as a verb,
I wonder whether prep "on" should follow immediately if "focus" works as a noun, that's why I cross off B, but I am not sure whether the reason is valid, because OE does not mention it.

please conform,

2/
(C) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent,

for meaning: I don't think "...what the extend would be." is not clear,
it is similar to ,
...what the question is.
for grammar:
I have not gotten why "whether ...." and "to what" are parallelisms?
"whether" cause is a question clause (I do not know the terminology)
"what" clause is a question clause as well.
"to what" clause is a prep phrase for me
IMO, whether can parallel to what,
here, the correct answer is what clause parallel to to what clause
(for me ,it is a prep phrase)

desiring your explanation

thanks a lot
have a nice day.
>_~
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Mar 2017
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
thanhmaitran wrote:
Also in (C) whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent ( would grow warmer) --- complete idea


I don't understand why whether Earth would grow warmer is parallel to to what extent:

> whether Earth would grow warmer is a dependant clause with a conjunction, a subject and a verb
> to what extent is is a prepositional phrase with a preposition and a noun

Moreover, the root Discussion.... has focused on...
a) ...whether Earth would grow warmer works
b) ...to what extent doesn't work

Thus, I'd conclude that the the Earth part and the extent part aren't parallel.

Any explanations? Thank you!
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [19]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
12
Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
guenthermat wrote:
I don't understand why whether Earth would grow warmer is parallel to to what extent:

> whether Earth would grow warmer is a dependant clause with a conjunction, a subject and a verb
> to what extent is is a prepositional phrase with a preposition and a noun

Moreover, the root Discussion.... has focused on...
a) ...whether Earth would grow warmer works
b) ...to what extent doesn't work

Thus, I'd conclude that the the Earth part and the extent part aren't parallel.

Any explanations? Thank you!

Dear guenthermat,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

First of all, remember that parallelism is NOT a grammatical structure. Parallelism is a logical structure, and any matching pattern in the grammar serves only to reflect the underlying logic. Thus, structures that don't appears similar can still be parallel if they are logical equivalents.

The two items in parallel here are substantive clauses, a.k.a noun clauses. A substantive clause one kind of dependent clause, and it always takes a noun-role in a sentence (subject, direct object, object of preposition). Both of these clauses are acting as nouns and objects of the verb "depend on."

1) whether Earth would grow warmer = a straightforward substantive clause

2) to what extent - this is tricky for a couple reasons. First of all, in the second branch of parallelism, a writer is always allowed to omit words that were present in the first branch. See:
Dropping Common Words in Parallel on the GMAT
This is always a confusing point for non-native speakers in particular. English is a difficult language and it's hard enough to understand all the words that are present, but now we also have to figure out the words that are missing!! With those repeated words, the full version would be:
to what extent [the Earth would grow warmer]
The entire sentence would be long and repetitive if all those words that appears in the first branch of the parallelism were repeated in the second. That's precisely why sophisticated writers, such as the author of this sentence, chose to drop repeated words: omitting the words creates sleeker, more elegant sentences.

Also, and this is another tricky point: when a dependent clause (such as a substantive clause or a relative clause) begins as a preposition, it is as if the preposition is "inside" the clause. Thus, this second substantive clause is acting as a noun parallel to the first one, and while it appears inside a preposition, it is as if that preposition were inside of it.

All of this is very sophisticated, but this is why (C) is 100% correct and why it contains flawlessly constructed parallelism.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 324 [0]
Given Kudos: 106
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.48
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
Dear expert @mikemcgarry,
I chose correct choice and eliminated wrong options in the same way as in previous posts. I just had a minor concern that is "grow warmer" similar, in meaning, to "get warmer"? If not and depending on particular context, then could you please show us more? Thank you a lot.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [4]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Expert Reply
Lucy Phuong wrote:
Dear expert mikemcgarry,
I chose correct choice and eliminated wrong options in the same way as in previous posts. I just had a minor concern that is "grow warmer" similar, in meaning, to "get warmer"? If not and depending on particular context, then could you please show us more? Thank you a lot.

Dear Lucy,

How are you? I'm happy to respond. :-)

Both options, "to get warmer" and "to grow warmer," mean exactly the same thing. I would say that "to get warmer" is more casual and colloquial, a little less typical of GMAT SC language, and "to grow warmer" is slightly more well-spoken and characteristic of that language. The choice between these two would NOT be a deciding split--we cannot say that "to get warmer" is definitively wrong. At the same time, it's not at all surprising that the OA employs the well-spoken option.

There are some rules in grammar that, like math, are black/white, right vs. wrong. For example, SVA and pronoun rules have to be 100% correct. Other issues are particularly subtle, such as word choice or split infinitives or ending with a preposition--these would never deciding splits on the GMAT SC, but as a general rule, the less preferred pattern appears only in SC choices that are wrong for other reasons. Thus, familiarity with these issues can confirm our other choices.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [8]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
6
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might, but climatologists have indicated all along that precipitation, storminess, and temperature extremes are likely to have the greatest impact on people.

(A) Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might,

(B) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually had as its focus whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be,

(C) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent,

(D) The discussion of greenhouse effects have usually focused on the possibility of Earth getting warmer and to what extent it might,

(E) The discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and the extent that is,



To whomever, it may suit ( especially the newly initiated))

I don't say it is a magic wand nor is it universally applicable; yet at times of doubt, while dealing with complex issues, you might be lucky to spot a few established customs to narrow down perhaps to almost the correct choice. After all, one percent wrong is 100 percent wrong in GMAT and we must be astute enough to spot those silly peccadilloes to eliminate a good chunk of incorrect choices. For example, in this given case, we can in one shot kick out choices A and D, for missing the number agreement. We might also dump B as per Verb -Adjective - Noun (VAN) rule.
Between C and E, the use of the definite article 'the' to denote a broad, perpetual and usual discussion is erroneous as per established norms. E misleadingly suggests that we are referring to a particular discussion. Therefore, C is the most likely choice, even if you are not clear which is the more parallel between C and E.

Let me caution you again that this knack goes with the usual disclaimers.

Originally posted by daagh on 26 May 2017, 07:44.
Last edited by daagh on 27 May 2017, 09:24, edited 1 time in total.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 817
Own Kudos [?]: 969 [1]
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might, but climatologists have indicated all along that precipitation, storminess, and temperature extremes are likely to have the greatest impact on people.

(A) Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might,

(B) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually had as its focus whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be,

(C) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent,

(D) The discussion of greenhouse effects have usually focused on the possibility of Earth getting warmer and to what extent it might,

(E) The discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and the extent that is,

Discussion is Singular and hence we need singular "had" + parallel structure "whether warmer" and "to what extent"

Hence - C
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Sep 2016
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [1]
Given Kudos: 198
Location: India
GMAT 1: 430 Q38 V13
GPA: 3.55
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Please explain why choice C is correct
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Saumya2403 wrote:
Please explain why choice C is correct

Dear Saumya2403,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, I am going to chide you. What you have asked here is a low quality question. Think about it: how much time and effort did you put into formulating your question? From the appearance, it looks as if you just typed it quickly and hit enter, with a minimum of engagement. I am sorry to tell you this, my friend, but you really are going to learn very little from this approach.

You see, it's a misunderstanding of many students that education is something that teachers and test experts "do" to a student, and the student is simply the passive recipient. In fact, you are 100% responsible for every aspect of your education. Education is something you do to yourself, by yourself, and for yourself, and we teachers & test prep experts can only help you. Some of the biggest determinations of how much you ultimately will learn are your commitment and determination. Are you really showing up for yourself? Do you really believe in your own possibility of success? Are you willing to engage with tremendous effort in order to bring forth your best possibilities.

If you want excellent results, you need to practice the habits of excellence. One of these is the habit of formulating excellent questions. See this blog article.
Asking Excellent Questions

Here's my challenge to you. Read that blog very carefully, and then come back her, study all the entries on this thread, and if you still don't understand why (C) is correct, formulate the highest quality question you can. If you do that, I will be more than happy to answer it.

Remember, my friend: how you do anything is how you do everything.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2017
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.82
WE:Information Technology (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
Could some please give a detailed explanation why option "b" is wrong, I am not able to understand.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4347
Own Kudos [?]: 30796 [3]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
yash321 wrote:
Could some please give a detailed explanation why option "b" is wrong, I am not able to understand.




Hello yash321,

I will be glad to help you out with this one. :-)

Following are errors in Choice B:


1. Meaning Error: It is not very clear what the extent actually corresponds/refers to. extent usually corresponds to something to convey the complete meaning. (the extent of something).

The extent of damage to buildings due to the earthquake is still unknown. (Correct)
The earthquake damaged a lot of buildings, but the extent is unknown. (Incorrect)


2. Idiom Error: The current construction requires a noun to follow the word focus.

Michael has usually maintained personal growth as his focus. (Correct)
Michael has usually maintained as his focus personal growth. (Rephrase: Correct)
Michael has usually maintained as his focus how to improve his personal growth. (Clause: Incorrect)


Similarly, in this sentence, the usage of the clause whether Earth would get… after focus is grammatically incorrect.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2021
Posts: 65
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Leadership
WE:Design (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
Reasoning:
- The sentence contrasts climatologists' views concerning greenhouse effects with other views that emphasize global warming.
- The main subject of the sentence is discussion....., which is singular, so the main verb should be singular.
- The two things that are said to be the focus of discussion should be in parallel form.

A. The plural verb have...had does not agree with the singular subject discussion. The phrases the possibility... warmer and to what... might are not parallel.

B. The verb form has had as its focus is unnecessarily wordy; the noun clauses are parallel in form, but it is not clear what the extent refers to

C. CORRECT This has correct Subject-Verb agreement, eliminates the wordiness of the original sentence, and the phrases whether... warmer and to what extent are parallel.

D. The singular subject discussion does not agree with the plural verb have focused. The possibility of... is not parallel with to what extent...

E. The two phrases following on are not in parallel form. What that refers to in the extent that is is unclear
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne