Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 03:34 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 03:34

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 392
Own Kudos [?]: 4075 [98]
Given Kudos: 18
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92929
Own Kudos [?]: 619106 [45]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92929
Own Kudos [?]: 619106 [6]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 392
Own Kudos [?]: 4075 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Send PM
Re: xy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
This is a good question, simple with a small trap
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1226
Own Kudos [?]: 518 [2]
Given Kudos: 31
Send PM
If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
|y - x| = x - y

y - x = x - y
2x = 2y
x=y so answer is no

-y + x = x-y
0=0
answer is no

sufficient
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 257 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
st 1) y=1, x=3/4 - false
y=-1, x=-3/4 - true
Not sufficient
st 2)
|y-x| =x-y--> x>y
Sufficient
coz |-x| = -(-x) = x -- basically a negative numbers should be negated again to get the result for absolute value
all the cases as cay that x>y but fails when x=y

combining we can answer the question

C

<didnt consider x=y option, so answered as B :ouch >

Originally posted by chix475ntu on 10 Feb 2010, 22:16.
Last edited by chix475ntu on 11 Feb 2010, 10:06, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Status:<strong>Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.</strong>
Posts: 2279
Own Kudos [?]: 3595 [0]
Given Kudos: 235
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Send PM
Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
chix475ntu wrote:
st 1) y=1, x=3/4 - false
y=-1, x=-3/4 - true
Not sufficient
st 2)
|y-x| =x-y--> x>y
Sufficient
coz |-x| = -(-x) = x -- basically a negative numbers should be negated again to get the result for absolute value

B


B alone is not sufficient as we dont know whether x=y?

So A gives information that x is not = y.

So Final ans is C
This was nice question...even I would have done the same mistake in the exam..Its really important to think of all the possibilities on the G day.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92929
Own Kudos [?]: 619106 [1]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Given: \(xy\neq0\). Question: is \(x>y\) true?

(1) \(4x = 3y\) --> if \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive, then \(x<y\) BUT if they are both negative then \(x>y\). Not sufficient. But from this statement we can grasp an important property we'll use while evaluating statements together: as \(xy\neq0\) then from statement (1) \(x\neq{y}\).

(2) \(|y-x|=x-y\). Now as LHS is absolute value, which is never negative, RHS must also be \(\geq0\) --> so \(x-y\geq0\) --> then \(|y-x|=-(y-x)\), and we'll get \(-(y-x)=x-y\) --> \(0=0\), which is true. This means that equation \(|y-x|=x-y\) holds true when \(x-y\geq0\) or, which is the same, when \(x\geq{y}\). But this not enough as \(x=y\) is still possible. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) we got that \(x\neq{y}\) and from (2) \(x\geq{y}\), hence \(x>y\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2013
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Given: \(xy\neq0\). Question: is \(x>y\) true?

(1) \(4x = 3y\) --> if \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive, then \(x<y\) BUT if they are both negative then \(x>y\). Not sufficient. But from this statement we can grasp an important property we'll use while evaluating statements together: as \(xy\neq0\) then from statement (1) \(x\neq{y}\).

(2) \(|y-x|=x-y\). Now as LHS is absolute value, which is never negative, RHS must also be \(\geq0\) --> so \(x-y\geq0\) --> then \(|y-x|=-(y-x)\), and we'll get \(-(y-x)=x-y\) --> \(0=0\), which is true. This means that equation \(|y-x|=x-y\) holds true when \(x-y\geq0\) or, which is the same, when \(x\geq{y}\). But this not enough as \(x=y\) is still possible. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) we got that \(x\neq{y}\) and from (2) \(x\geq{y}\), hence \(x>y\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.


Dear Bunuel:

I am a bit confused with this problem. I don't have a problem to understand the first statement, but I do have a problem trying to understand the second one..

I saw a user on this thread was solving the second statement as this:

2. |y - x| = x - y

y - x = x - y
2x = 2y
x=y

-y + x = x-y
0=0

Isn't his way of solving the correct way to solve this kind of problems? I have seen some other exercises and they always negate the LHS that has the absolute value on it regarding of the inequality symbol or equality. I would like to learn why we are not doing this on this problem.

If I am wrong, would you be so kind to revamp the way of solving statement 2, I already read the way you solved it, but it was not 100% clear for me.

Thanks in advance.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92929
Own Kudos [?]: 619106 [0]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: Inequalities [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Aidhen wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Given: \(xy\neq0\). Question: is \(x>y\) true?

(1) \(4x = 3y\) --> if \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive, then \(x<y\) BUT if they are both negative then \(x>y\). Not sufficient. But from this statement we can grasp an important property we'll use while evaluating statements together: as \(xy\neq0\) then from statement (1) \(x\neq{y}\).

(2) \(|y-x|=x-y\). Now as LHS is absolute value, which is never negative, RHS must also be \(\geq0\) --> so \(x-y\geq0\) --> then \(|y-x|=-(y-x)\), and we'll get \(-(y-x)=x-y\) --> \(0=0\), which is true. This means that equation \(|y-x|=x-y\) holds true when \(x-y\geq0\) or, which is the same, when \(x\geq{y}\). But this not enough as \(x=y\) is still possible. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) we got that \(x\neq{y}\) and from (2) \(x\geq{y}\), hence \(x>y\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.


Dear Bunuel:

I am a bit confused with this problem. I don't have a problem to understand the first statement, but I do have a problem trying to understand the second one..

I saw a user on this thread was solving the second statement as this:

2. |y - x| = x - y

y - x = x - y
2x = 2y
x=y

-y + x = x-y
0=0

Isn't his way of solving the correct way to solve this kind of problems? I have seen some other exercises and they always negate the LHS that has the absolute value on it regarding of the inequality symbol or equality. I would like to learn why we are not doing this on this problem.

If I am wrong, would you be so kind to revamp the way of solving statement 2, I already read the way you solved it, but it was not 100% clear for me.

Thanks in advance.


There can be many correct ways to solve a questions.

Try this one: (2) says that \(|y-x|=-(y-x)\). We know that \(|x|=-x\), when \(x\leq{0}\), thus \(y-x\leq{0}\).
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2014
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 26 [2]
Given Kudos: 88
D: M
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y

(2) |y - x| = x - y

Consider (1)
4x=3y ; x=3/-3 and y =4/-4 satisfy this condition. so x can be > y or x can be <y.
insufficient

Consider (2)

|y - x| = x - y
x= 4 y =3 satisfy this , and x>y
x= 3 y=3 satisfy this but x =y
x= 3 and y = 4 doesnt satisfy
x=-3 and y =-4 satisfy this and x >y
hence insufficient

combining 1 and 2 the only option that satisfy 1 and 2 is x=-3 and y=-4 and hence x>y

Therefore C is the answer.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2015
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.11
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Bunuel wrote:
Given: \(xy\neq0\). Question: is \(x>y\) true?

(1) \(4x = 3y\) --> if \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive, then \(x<y\) BUT if they are both negative then \(x>y\). Not sufficient. But from this statement we can grasp an important property we'll use while evaluating statements together: as \(xy\neq0\) then from statement (1) \(x\neq{y}\).

(2) \(|y-x|=x-y\). Now as LHS is absolute value, which is never negative, RHS must also be \(\geq0\) --> so \(x-y\geq0\) --> then \(|y-x|=-(y-x)\), and we'll get \(-(y-x)=x-y\) --> \(0=0\), which is true. This means that equation \(|y-x|=x-y\) holds true when \(x-y\geq0\) or, which is the same, when \(x\geq{y}\). But this not enough as \(x=y\) is still possible. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) we got that \(x\neq{y}\) and from (2) \(x\geq{y}\), hence \(x>y\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.


Hello Bunuel,

Thank you for your answer. Although , as per mod property, isn't it the case that |x| = x when x>=0 and -x when x<0 ? I would like to know why you are considering |x| = -x when x<=0, because this is where the answer is really hinged on.

Thanks!
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92929
Own Kudos [?]: 619106 [0]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
Expert Reply
ramblersm wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Given: \(xy\neq0\). Question: is \(x>y\) true?

(1) \(4x = 3y\) --> if \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive, then \(x<y\) BUT if they are both negative then \(x>y\). Not sufficient. But from this statement we can grasp an important property we'll use while evaluating statements together: as \(xy\neq0\) then from statement (1) \(x\neq{y}\).

(2) \(|y-x|=x-y\). Now as LHS is absolute value, which is never negative, RHS must also be \(\geq0\) --> so \(x-y\geq0\) --> then \(|y-x|=-(y-x)\), and we'll get \(-(y-x)=x-y\) --> \(0=0\), which is true. This means that equation \(|y-x|=x-y\) holds true when \(x-y\geq0\) or, which is the same, when \(x\geq{y}\). But this not enough as \(x=y\) is still possible. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) we got that \(x\neq{y}\) and from (2) \(x\geq{y}\), hence \(x>y\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.


Hello Bunuel,

Thank you for your answer. Although , as per mod property, isn't it the case that |x| = x when x>=0 and -x when x<0 ? I would like to know why you are considering |x| = -x when x<=0, because this is where the answer is really hinged on.

Thanks!


|0| = 0 = -0, so you can include = sign in either of the cases: |x| = -x, when x<=0 and |x| = x, when x >= 0.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 248
Own Kudos [?]: 234 [0]
Given Kudos: 338
GMAT 1: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 2: 570 Q43 V27
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
Send PM
Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Economist wrote:
If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y

(2) |y - x| = x - y


This is a good one. +1 Economist for it.

If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

Question asks whether \(x>y\)?

(1) 4x = 3y --> \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\), well this one is relatively easy. This statement only tells that x and y have the same sign. When they are both positive then \(x>y\), BUT when they are both negative \(y>x\). Not sufficient.

(2) \(|y - x| = x - y\) --> \(|y - x| = -(y-x)\). This means that \(y - x\leq{0}\) --> \(x\geq{y}\). Thus, this statement says that x can be more than or equal to y. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) (\(x=\frac{3}{4}y\)) it follows that \(x\) is not equal to \(y\) (bearing in mind that xy ≠ 0), hence from (2): \(x>y\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.



For (1), isn't it the opposite? when both +ve x<y, when both -ve x>y.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 435
Own Kudos [?]: 443 [0]
Given Kudos: 752
Location: Malaysia
GPA: 3.95
WE:Consulting (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
urvashis09 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Economist wrote:
If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y

(2) |y - x| = x - y


This is a good one. +1 Economist for it.

If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

Question asks whether \(x>y\)?

(1) 4x = 3y --> \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\), well this one is relatively easy. This statement only tells that x and y have the same sign. When they are both positive then \(x>y\), BUT when they are both negative \(y>x\). Not sufficient.

(2) \(|y - x| = x - y\) --> \(|y - x| = -(y-x)\). This means that \(y - x\leq{0}\) --> \(x\geq{y}\). Thus, this statement says that x can be more than or equal to y. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) (\(x=\frac{3}{4}y\)) it follows that \(x\) is not equal to \(y\) (bearing in mind that xy ≠ 0), hence from (2): \(x>y\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.



For (1), isn't it the opposite? when both +ve x<y, when both -ve x>y.



Yes but that doesn't change the answer anyway.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2017
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [0]
Given Kudos: 467
Send PM
If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
Kudos for the explanation. Am having trouble with absolute value and inequalities. How can I improve????
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92929
Own Kudos [?]: 619106 [1]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Dec 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
Economist wrote:
If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y

(2) |y - x| = x - y

:facepalm_man: silly Mistake and end up with :hurt:
SVP
SVP
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Posts: 1720
Own Kudos [?]: 1344 [0]
Given Kudos: 607
Location: United States
Send PM
Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
Economist wrote:
If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y

(2) |y - x| = x - y



(1) 4x = 3y: insufic
x=3/4*y
x,y>0: then x<y…y=1, x=3/4(1)=3/4<1
x,y<0: then x>y…y=-2, x=3/4(-2)=-1.5>-2

(2) |y - x| = x - y: insufic
|y-x|≥0…x-y≥0…x≥y; x=y or x>y

(1/2) sufic
since x=3/4y then x≠y, thus x>y

Ans (C)
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32680
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) |y - x| = x - y [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92929 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne