Apr 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Christina scored 760 by having clear (ability) milestones and a trackable plan to achieve the same. Attend this webinar to learn how to build trackable milestones that leverage your strengths to help you get to your target GMAT score. Apr 20 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT The Easter Bunny brings … the first day of school?? Yes! Now is the time to start studying for the GMAT if you’re planning to apply to Round 1 of fall MBA programs. Get a special discount with the Easter sale! Apr 21 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Apr 21 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT $84 + an extra $10 off for the first month of EMPOWERgmat access. Train to be ready for Round 3 Deadlines with EMPOWERgmat's Score Booster. Ends April 21st Code: GCENHANCED Apr 22 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips, and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL. Save your spot today! Apr 23 08:00 PM EDT  09:00 PM EDT Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Tuesday, April 23rd at 8 pm ET Apr 24 08:00 PM EDT  09:00 PM EDT Maximize Your Potential: 5 Steps to Getting Your Dream MBA Part 3 of 5: Key TestTaking Strategies for GMAT. Wednesday, April 24th at 8 pm ET
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 752
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX)  Class of 2014

If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Nov 2009, 09:45
Question Stats:
20% (01:47) correct 80% (01:54) wrong based on 642 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If xy ≠ 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54371

If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Nov 2009, 10:14
Economist wrote: If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?
(1) 4x = 3y
(2) y  x = x  y This is a good one. +1 Economist for it. If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?Question asks whether \(x>y\)? (1) 4x = 3y > \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\), well this one is relatively easy. This statement only tells that x and y have the same sign. When they are both positive then \(x<y\), BUT when they are both negative \(y<x\). Not sufficient. (2) \(y  x = x  y\) > \(y  x = (yx)\). This means that \(y  x\leq{0}\) > \(x\geq{y}\). Thus, this statement says that x can be more than or equal to y. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) From (1) (\(x=\frac{3}{4}y\)) it follows that \(x\) is not equal to \(y\) (bearing in mind that xy ≠ 0), hence from (2): \(x>y\). Sufficient. Answer: C.
_________________




Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 752
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX)  Class of 2014

This is a good question, simple with a small trap



VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1395

If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Nov 2009, 10:26
y  x = x  y
y  x = x  y 2x = 2y x=y so answer is no
y + x = xy 0=0 answer is no
sufficient



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54371

lagomez wrote: 2. y  x = x  y
y  x = x  y 2x = 2y x=y so answer is no
y + x = xy 0=0 answer is no
sufficient
One more thing: the red part is not correct. \(y  x = x  y\). Look at the LHS it's absolute value, it's never negative, hence RHS or \(xy\) is never negative, \(xy>=0\) or \(yx<=0\). If so then only one possibility for \(y  x\), it must be \(y+x\). So we'll have: Condition: \(yx<=0\), which is the same as \(x>=y\) And: \(y  x = x  y\)> \(y+x=xy\), > \(0=0\). The above means that \(y  x = x  y\) is always true for \(x>=y\). But as we concluded earlier it's not enough. We need to be sure that \(x>y\). And \(x>=y\) leaves the possibility that they are equal, which is removed with the statement (1) when considering together. Hence C.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 185

Re: Inequalities
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 11 Feb 2010, 10:06
st 1) y=1, x=3/4  false y=1, x=3/4  true Not sufficient st 2) yx =xy> x>y Sufficient coz x = (x) = x  basically a negative numbers should be negated again to get the result for absolute value all the cases as cay that x>y but fails when x=y combining we can answer the question C <didnt consider x=y option, so answered as B >
Originally posted by chix475ntu on 10 Feb 2010, 22:16.
Last edited by chix475ntu on 11 Feb 2010, 10:06, edited 1 time in total.



CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2567
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31 GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35

Re: Inequalities
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Feb 2010, 00:08
chix475ntu wrote: st 1) y=1, x=3/4  false y=1, x=3/4  true Not sufficient st 2) yx =xy> x>y Sufficient coz x = (x) = x  basically a negative numbers should be negated again to get the result for absolute value
B B alone is not sufficient as we dont know whether x=y? So A gives information that x is not = y. So Final ans is C This was nice question...even I would have done the same mistake in the exam..Its really important to think of all the possibilities on the G day.
_________________
Fight for your dreams : For all those who fear from Verbal lets give it a fightMoney Saved is the Money Earned Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savingsGmat test review : http://gmatclub.com/forum/670to710alongjourneywithoutdestinationstillhappy141642.html



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54371

Re: Inequalities
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Feb 2010, 11:55
Given: \(xy\neq0\). Question: is \(x>y\) true? (1) \(4x = 3y\) > if \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive, then \(x<y\) BUT if they are both negative then \(x>y\). Not sufficient. But from this statement we can grasp an important property we'll use while evaluating statements together: as \(xy\neq0\) then from statement (1) \(x\neq{y}\). (2) \(yx=xy\). Now as LHS is absolute value, which is never negative, RHS must also be \(\geq0\) > so \(xy\geq0\) > then \(yx=(yx)\), and we'll get \((yx)=xy\) > \(0=0\), which is true. This means that equation \(yx=xy\) holds true when \(xy\geq0\) or, which is the same, when \(x\geq{y}\). But this not enough as \(x=y\) is still possible. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) From (1) we got that \(x\neq{y}\) and from (2) \(x\geq{y}\), hence \(x>y\). Sufficient. Answer: C. Hope it helps.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2013
Posts: 1

Re: Inequalities
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Sep 2013, 14:42
Bunuel wrote: Given: \(xy\neq0\). Question: is \(x>y\) true?
(1) \(4x = 3y\) > if \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive, then \(x<y\) BUT if they are both negative then \(x>y\). Not sufficient. But from this statement we can grasp an important property we'll use while evaluating statements together: as \(xy\neq0\) then from statement (1) \(x\neq{y}\).
(2) \(yx=xy\). Now as LHS is absolute value, which is never negative, RHS must also be \(\geq0\) > so \(xy\geq0\) > then \(yx=(yx)\), and we'll get \((yx)=xy\) > \(0=0\), which is true. This means that equation \(yx=xy\) holds true when \(xy\geq0\) or, which is the same, when \(x\geq{y}\). But this not enough as \(x=y\) is still possible. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) From (1) we got that \(x\neq{y}\) and from (2) \(x\geq{y}\), hence \(x>y\). Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it helps. Dear Bunuel: I am a bit confused with this problem. I don't have a problem to understand the first statement, but I do have a problem trying to understand the second one.. I saw a user on this thread was solving the second statement as this: 2. y  x = x  y y  x = x  y 2x = 2y x=y y + x = xy 0=0 Isn't his way of solving the correct way to solve this kind of problems? I have seen some other exercises and they always negate the LHS that has the absolute value on it regarding of the inequality symbol or equality. I would like to learn why we are not doing this on this problem. If I am wrong, would you be so kind to revamp the way of solving statement 2, I already read the way you solved it, but it was not 100% clear for me. Thanks in advance.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54371

Re: Inequalities
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Oct 2013, 00:34
Aidhen wrote: Bunuel wrote: Given: \(xy\neq0\). Question: is \(x>y\) true?
(1) \(4x = 3y\) > if \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive, then \(x<y\) BUT if they are both negative then \(x>y\). Not sufficient. But from this statement we can grasp an important property we'll use while evaluating statements together: as \(xy\neq0\) then from statement (1) \(x\neq{y}\).
(2) \(yx=xy\). Now as LHS is absolute value, which is never negative, RHS must also be \(\geq0\) > so \(xy\geq0\) > then \(yx=(yx)\), and we'll get \((yx)=xy\) > \(0=0\), which is true. This means that equation \(yx=xy\) holds true when \(xy\geq0\) or, which is the same, when \(x\geq{y}\). But this not enough as \(x=y\) is still possible. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) From (1) we got that \(x\neq{y}\) and from (2) \(x\geq{y}\), hence \(x>y\). Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it helps. Dear Bunuel: I am a bit confused with this problem. I don't have a problem to understand the first statement, but I do have a problem trying to understand the second one.. I saw a user on this thread was solving the second statement as this: 2. y  x = x  y y  x = x  y 2x = 2y x=y y + x = xy 0=0 Isn't his way of solving the correct way to solve this kind of problems? I have seen some other exercises and they always negate the LHS that has the absolute value on it regarding of the inequality symbol or equality. I would like to learn why we are not doing this on this problem. If I am wrong, would you be so kind to revamp the way of solving statement 2, I already read the way you solved it, but it was not 100% clear for me. Thanks in advance. There can be many correct ways to solve a questions. Try this one: (2) says that \(yx=(yx)\). We know that \(x=x\), when \(x\leq{0}\), thus \(yx\leq{0}\).
_________________



Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2014
Posts: 16
D: M
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2014, 22:26
If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?
(1) 4x = 3y
(2) y  x = x  y
Consider (1) 4x=3y ; x=3/3 and y =4/4 satisfy this condition. so x can be > y or x can be <y. insufficient
Consider (2)
y  x = x  y x= 4 y =3 satisfy this , and x>y x= 3 y=3 satisfy this but x =y x= 3 and y = 4 doesnt satisfy x=3 and y =4 satisfy this and x >y hence insufficient
combining 1 and 2 the only option that satisfy 1 and 2 is x=3 and y=4 and hence x>y
Therefore C is the answer.



Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2015
Posts: 7
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: CBS '19, Tuck '19, Duke '19, Anderson '19, Johnson '19, KenanFlagler '19, Marshall '19, HEC Sept'16, HEC Jan'16, ISB '18 (A), Smeal Penn State "19
GPA: 3.11
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Aug 2016, 23:33
Bunuel wrote: Given: \(xy\neq0\). Question: is \(x>y\) true?
(1) \(4x = 3y\) > if \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive, then \(x<y\) BUT if they are both negative then \(x>y\). Not sufficient. But from this statement we can grasp an important property we'll use while evaluating statements together: as \(xy\neq0\) then from statement (1) \(x\neq{y}\).
(2) \(yx=xy\). Now as LHS is absolute value, which is never negative, RHS must also be \(\geq0\) > so \(xy\geq0\) > then \(yx=(yx)\), and we'll get \((yx)=xy\) > \(0=0\), which is true. This means that equation \(yx=xy\) holds true when \(xy\geq0\) or, which is the same, when \(x\geq{y}\). But this not enough as \(x=y\) is still possible. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) From (1) we got that \(x\neq{y}\) and from (2) \(x\geq{y}\), hence \(x>y\). Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it helps. Hello Bunuel, Thank you for your answer. Although , as per mod property, isn't it the case that x = x when x>=0 and x when x<0 ? I would like to know why you are considering x = x when x<=0, because this is where the answer is really hinged on. Thanks!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54371

Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Aug 2016, 00:58
ramblersm wrote: Bunuel wrote: Given: \(xy\neq0\). Question: is \(x>y\) true?
(1) \(4x = 3y\) > if \(x\) and \(y\) are both positive, then \(x<y\) BUT if they are both negative then \(x>y\). Not sufficient. But from this statement we can grasp an important property we'll use while evaluating statements together: as \(xy\neq0\) then from statement (1) \(x\neq{y}\).
(2) \(yx=xy\). Now as LHS is absolute value, which is never negative, RHS must also be \(\geq0\) > so \(xy\geq0\) > then \(yx=(yx)\), and we'll get \((yx)=xy\) > \(0=0\), which is true. This means that equation \(yx=xy\) holds true when \(xy\geq0\) or, which is the same, when \(x\geq{y}\). But this not enough as \(x=y\) is still possible. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) From (1) we got that \(x\neq{y}\) and from (2) \(x\geq{y}\), hence \(x>y\). Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it helps. Hello Bunuel, Thank you for your answer. Although , as per mod property, isn't it the case that x = x when x>=0 and x when x<0 ? I would like to know why you are considering x = x when x<=0, because this is where the answer is really hinged on. Thanks! 0 = 0 = 0, so you can include = sign in either of the cases: x = x, when x<=0 and x = x, when x >= 0.
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 309
GMAT 1: 560 Q42 V25 GMAT 2: 570 Q43 V27 GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39

Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jan 2018, 08:28
Bunuel wrote: Economist wrote: If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?
(1) 4x = 3y
(2) y  x = x  y This is a good one. +1 Economist for it. If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?Question asks whether \(x>y\)? (1) 4x = 3y > \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\), well this one is relatively easy. This statement only tells that x and y have the same sign. When they are both positive then \(x>y\), BUT when they are both negative \(y>x\). Not sufficient. (2) \(y  x = x  y\) > \(y  x = (yx)\). This means that \(y  x\leq{0}\) > \(x\geq{y}\). Thus, this statement says that x can be more than or equal to y. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) From (1) (\(x=\frac{3}{4}y\)) it follows that \(x\) is not equal to \(y\) (bearing in mind that xy ≠ 0), hence from (2): \(x>y\). Sufficient. Answer: C. For (1), isn't it the opposite? when both +ve x<y, when both ve x>y.



Director
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 516
Location: Malaysia
GPA: 3.95
WE: Consulting (Energy and Utilities)

Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jan 2018, 08:36
urvashis09 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Economist wrote: If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?
(1) 4x = 3y
(2) y  x = x  y This is a good one. +1 Economist for it. If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?Question asks whether \(x>y\)? (1) 4x = 3y > \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\), well this one is relatively easy. This statement only tells that x and y have the same sign. When they are both positive then \(x>y\), BUT when they are both negative \(y>x\). Not sufficient. (2) \(y  x = x  y\) > \(y  x = (yx)\). This means that \(y  x\leq{0}\) > \(x\geq{y}\). Thus, this statement says that x can be more than or equal to y. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) From (1) (\(x=\frac{3}{4}y\)) it follows that \(x\) is not equal to \(y\) (bearing in mind that xy ≠ 0), hence from (2): \(x>y\). Sufficient. Answer: C. For (1), isn't it the opposite? when both +ve x<y, when both ve x>y. Yes but that doesn't change the answer anyway.
_________________
If my Post helps you in Gaining Knowledge, Help me with KUDOS.. !!



Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2017
Posts: 81

If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Feb 2018, 06:59
Kudos for the explanation. Am having trouble with absolute value and inequalities. How can I improve????



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54371

Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Feb 2018, 07:10
Kezia9 wrote: Kudos for the explanation. Am having trouble with absolute value and inequalities. How can I improve???? 9. Inequalities For more check Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread Hope it helps.
_________________



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 10553

Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Apr 2019, 07:29
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: If xy 0, is x > y? (1) 4x = 3y (2) y  x = x  y
[#permalink]
14 Apr 2019, 07:29






