Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If x and y are positive integers such that x = 8y + 12, what is the greatest common divisor of x and y?

1) x = 12u, where u is an integer.

2) y = 12z, where z is an integer.

well I guess the first questions was quite easy. How about this one? do you still use numbers to solve?

OK. Algebraic approach:

Given: \(x=8y+12\).

(1) \(x=12u\) --> \(12u=8y+12\) --> \(3(u-1)=2y\) --> the only thing we know from this is that 3 is a factor of \(y\). Is it GCD of \(x\) and \(y\)? Not clear: if \(x=36\), then \(y=3\) and \(GCD(x,y)=3\) but if \(x=60\), then \(y=6\) and \(GCD(x,y)=6\) --> two different answers. Not sufficient.

(2) \(y=12z\) --> \(x=8*12z+12\) --> \(x=12(8z+1)\) --> so 12 is a factor both \(x\) and \(y\).

Is it GCD of \(x\) and \(y\)? Why can not it be more than 12, for example 13, 16, 24, ... We see that factors of \(x\) are 12 and \(8z+1\): so if \(8z+1\) has some factor >1 common with \(z\) then GCD of \(x\) and \(y\) will be more than 12 (for example if \(z\) and \(8z+1\) are multiples of 5 then \(x\) would be multiple of \(12*5=60\) and \(y\) also would be multiple of \(12*5=60\), so GCD of \(x\) and \(y\) would be more than 12). But \(z\) and \(8z+1\) CAN NOT share any common factor >1, as \(8z+1\) is a multiple of \(z\) plus 1, so no factor of \(z\) will divide \(8z+1\) evenly, which means that GCD of \(x\) and \(y\) can not be more than 12. \(GCD(x,y)=12\). Sufficient.

Wow! I have to come up with this conclusion in 2 minutes? Thanks! I guess it will help me if I'll see something similar...

There is a general rule: if \(a\) and \(b\) are multiples of \(k\) and are \(k\) units apart from each other then \(k\) is greatest common divisor of \(a\) and \(b\).

For example if \(a\) and \(b\) are multiples of 7 and \(a=b+7\) then 7 is GCD of \(a\) and \(b\).

So if we apply this rule to (2) we would have: both \(x\) and \(y\) are multiple of 12 and are 12 apart each other, so 12 is GCD of \(x\) and \(y\).

So in my previous post I just showed the way this general rule is derived.

Wow! I have to come up with this conclusion in 2 minutes? Thanks! I guess it will help me if I'll see something similar...

There is a general rule: if \(a\) and \(b\) are multiples of \(k\) and are \(k\) units apart from each other then \(k\) is greatest common divisor of \(a\) and \(b\).

For example if \(a\) and \(b\) are multiples of 7 and \(a=b+7\) then 7 is GCD of \(a\) and \(b\).

So if we apply this rule to (2) we would have: both \(x\) and \(y\) are multiple of 12 and are 12 apart each other, so 12 is GCD of \(x\) and \(y\).

So in my previous post I just showed the way this general rule is derived.

rafi: Same logic as that given by Bunuel and shrouded1 above, just worded differently in case you have come across this before: "Two consecutive integers do not have any common factors other than 1"

So 8z and 8z + 1 will not share any factors other than 1 and all factors of z will be factors of 8z too. Therefore, z and 8z + 1 will not have any common factors other than 1.
_________________

Wow! I have to come up with this conclusion in 2 minutes? Thanks! I guess it will help me if I'll see something similar...

There is a general rule: if \(a\) and \(b\) are multiples of \(k\) and are \(k\) units apart from each other then \(k\) is greatest common divisor of \(a\) and \(b\).

For example if \(a\) and \(b\) are multiples of 7 and \(a=b+7\) then 7 is GCD of \(a\) and \(b\).

So if we apply this rule to (2) we would have: both \(x\) and \(y\) are multiple of 12 and are 12 apart each other, so 12 is GCD of \(x\) and \(y\).

So in my previous post I just showed the way this general rule is derived.

Hope it helps.

Bunuel I have a question with statement 2. Kindly clarify:

if \(y= 12z\) and \(x= 8*12z+12\) , then \(x - y = 96z + 12 - 12z = 84z + 12\).

\(84z + 12\) is not euqal to \(12\)

how is it that you're saying \(x\) and \(y\) are 12 units apart from each other?

Re: If x and y are positive integers such that x = 8y + 12, what [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 May 2015, 23:15

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Since both of you have same doubt, I will take it up together.

In this question x = 8y + 12 i.e. x can be represented as some multiple of y + 12. So, if y is divisible by 3, x will also be divisible by 3, similarly for 4 and 6( as 3,4, 6 divide 12). Also, if y is divisible by 12, x will also be divisible by 12.

Consider a situation where y is divisible by 16, will then x be divisible by 16 too? It will not because 12 is not divisible by 16. In fact if y is divisible by any number greater than 12, x will not be divisible by that number, it will always leave a remainder of 12.

So, here x and y are not 12 units apart but x is 12 units apart from a multiple of y. Since st-II tells us that y = 12z i.e. y is divisible by 12, x will always be divisible by 12 as x is 12 units apart from a multiple of y.

Since y = 12z, x = 12(8z + 1).The only thing we need to be careful here is if z and 8z + 1 have a common factor. 8z + 1 can be again interpreted as some multiple of z + 1. So, if any number greater than 1 is a factor of z, it will always leave a remainder of 1 when dividing 8z + 1. Hence, z and 8z + 1 will not have a common factor greater than 1.

Therefore 12 will be the highest number which divides both x and y i.e. their GCD.

Re: If x and y are positive integers such that x = 8y + 12, what [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Oct 2016, 04:20

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...