Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Oct 2410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
This Halloween, get 20% off any Target Test Prep GMAT plan. Just use the coupon code HALLOWEEN20 at checkout to save up to $320.
Oct 2910:00 AM PDT
-07:30 AM PDT
Scary Savings Alert! Prepare with up to 44% off on our plans and score 99th %ile on GMAT Focus. Claim this fa-BOO-lous deal & get access to a personalized study plan, 100+ video lessons, 5 mocks & more at prices starting $149. Hurry up!
Oct 3112:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On Thursday the 31st, GMAT Club Tests will be Absolutely Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PST
Oct 3111:00 AM EDT
-11:00 PM EDT
Save 20% on Target Test Prep and get a perfect score like Julia. Through Thursday, October 31, get an EXTRA 20% OFF any Target Test Prep GMAT plan by using the coupon code HALLOWEEN20 at checkout.
Oct 3101:30 PM IST
-11:30 PM IST
With brand new features like:AI-driven Planner tool, 850+ data Insights practice questions and GMAT Focus Edition Adaptive mock tests with ESR+ analysis and personal mentor support, our course is the most comprehensive course for GMAT Focus Edition.- Nov 02
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this session to learn how to Deconstruct arguments, Pre-Think Author’s Assumptions, and apply Negation Test. - Nov 03
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 0311:30 AM EST
-12:30 PM EST
Is INSEAD your dream b-school and you're looking for solid prep and application strategies to get there? Check out Barkavi’s end-to-end journey to know how she did! Get insights into the INSEAD admissions process, know what Adcoms look at, and more!- Nov 13
05:30 AM PST
-06:00 PM PST
We are excited to bring you the Fall edition of the MBA Spotlight Fair! Meet admission officers from the top 20 MBA programs—including HBS, Stanford, and Wharton—as you prepare for Round 2 applications.
04 Jun 2022, 18:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
53% (02:08) correct
47%
(02:09)
wrong
based on 119
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
McBride: The proposed new fuel-efficiency standards, if implemented, will discourage the manufacture of full-size cars. This prospect is troubling because when a subcompact and a full-size car collide, the people in the subcompact are more likely to be seriously injured than if theirs had also been a full-size car. The new fuel-efficiency standards should therefore be opposed.
Leggett: But whenever any two cars collide, it is more likely that someone will be seriously injured if one of the cars is a full-size car than if neither car is full-size. So the new fuel-efficiency standards should be supported precisely because they discourage the manufacture of full-size cars.
Which one of the following argumentative strategies does Leggett use in attempting to refute McBride’s position?
(A) demonstrating that McBride’s claims are contradictory
(B) challenging the unstated assumption that all cars are either full-size or subcompact
(C) shifting the perspective from which the issue of automobile safety is considered
(D) raising doubts about the accuracy of a generalization made by McBride
(E) demonstrating that it is impossible to follow the course of action advocated by McBride
Leggett: But whenever any two cars collide, it is more likely that someone will be seriously injured if one of the cars is a full-size car than if neither car is full-size. So the new fuel-efficiency standards should be supported precisely because they discourage the manufacture of full-size cars.
Which one of the following argumentative strategies does Leggett use in attempting to refute McBride’s position?
(A) demonstrating that McBride’s claims are contradictory
(B) challenging the unstated assumption that all cars are either full-size or subcompact
(C) shifting the perspective from which the issue of automobile safety is considered
(D) raising doubts about the accuracy of a generalization made by McBride
(E) demonstrating that it is impossible to follow the course of action advocated by McBride
04 Jun 2022, 23:01
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
McBride: The proposed new fuel-efficiency standards, if implemented, will discourage the manufacture of full-size cars. This prospect is troubling because when a subcompact and a full-size car collide, the people in the subcompact are more likely to be seriously injured than if theirs had also been a full-size car. The new fuel-efficiency standards should therefore be opposed.
Leggett: But whenever any two cars collide, it is more likely that someone will be seriously injured if one of the cars is a full-size car than if neither car is full-size. So the new fuel-efficiency standards should be supported precisely because they discourage the manufacture of full-size cars.
Which one of the following argumentative strategies does Leggett use in attempting to refute McBride’s position?
(A) demonstrating that McBride’s claims are contradictory
(B) challenging the unstated assumption that all cars are either full-size or subcompact
(C) shifting the perspective from which the issue of automobile safety is considered
(D) raising doubts about the accuracy of a generalization made by McBride
(E) demonstrating that it is impossible to follow the course of action advocated by McBride
Leggett: But whenever any two cars collide, it is more likely that someone will be seriously injured if one of the cars is a full-size car than if neither car is full-size. So the new fuel-efficiency standards should be supported precisely because they discourage the manufacture of full-size cars.
Which one of the following argumentative strategies does Leggett use in attempting to refute McBride’s position?
(A) demonstrating that McBride’s claims are contradictory
(B) challenging the unstated assumption that all cars are either full-size or subcompact
(C) shifting the perspective from which the issue of automobile safety is considered
(D) raising doubts about the accuracy of a generalization made by McBride
(E) demonstrating that it is impossible to follow the course of action advocated by McBride
I think E is a better option. As the generalization that "Manufacturers will not make full-size cars" is only partially taken into account.
McBride only considers one of the colliding cars to be subcompact.
