Bunuel
Historians create ideas we call "history," which are derived from an order existing in the real world of historical fact. Since the patterns discovered in that world depend in part on the aims of the investigator, however, historical periods will tend to be defined in incompatible ways by historians with different interests. Thus, insofar as the aims of historians of music, painting, literature, and poetry are different, it cannot be assumed that
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
A. real-world facts about art will ever be accurately represented
B. the accounts of these historians will ever be anything but arbitrary
C. the periods of artistic style delineated by these historians will coincide
D. the historical patterns defined by these historians will differ appreciably
E. there are any facts from which patterns of artistic style may be derived
Hard to understand if you are not a history major! But this is what I will do:
Premises:Historians create history from an order existing in the real world (I don't understand it fully, but ok, I will just take this to be so.)
The patterns of real world depend on the aims of the investigator so historians with diff interests will define it differently. (Ok, at least this makes sense that what history they create depends on their perspective)
Conclusion: So, assuming that the aims of historians of music, painting, literature, and poetry are different, it cannot be assumed that ...
What am I looking for? Something that says: "they will create similar history"
I am given that the patterns depend on their aim and the aims of all these historians are different. So the history they create should be different. I cannot assume that the history they create would be same.
A. real-world facts about art will ever be accurately representedWe do not know what is "accurate representation" and if one does exist. Ignore.
B. the accounts of these historians will ever be anything but arbitraryNo one said that their account are arbitrary. They are dependent of their aims so they are different. They could all make sense in their own way.
C. the periods of artistic style delineated by these historians will coincideThis is what I was looking for. This says: "the periods defined by these historians will coincide".
It makes sense that we cannot assume that the periods defined by these historians will coincide. We expect them to be different.
D. the historical patterns defined by these historians will differ appreciablyWe do expect them to differ.
E. there are any facts from which patterns of artistic style may be derivedThere are. Just that the patterns are different when viewed with different aims.
Answer (C)